Information feedback in construction contract bidding: Perceptions of Hong Kong contractors

References

• Aliakbarlou S, Wilkinson S, Costello SB. 2018. Rethinking client value within construction contracting services. Int J Mod Phys B. 11(4):1007–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez P, Skitmore M, Sanz-Ablanedo E, Verhoeven P. 2019. Forecasting the number and distribution of new bidders for an upcoming construction auction. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(10):04019056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Kannan KN, Siebert R. 2011. An experimental study of information revelation policies in sequential auctions. Manage Sci. 57(4):667–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department. 2020. Report on the quarterly survey of construction output, 2nd quarter 2020. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• De Neufville R, Lesage Y, Hani EN. 1977. Bidding models: effects of bidders' risk aversion. J Constr Div. 103(1):57–70.
   Google Scholar
• DEVB: list of approved contractors for public works. Hong Kong: Development Bureau; [accessed 2020 Nov 15]. https://www.devb.gov.hk/Contractor.aspx?section=80&lang=1.
   Google Scholar
• Development Bureau. 2014. Tender procedures for procurement governed by the agreement on government procurement of the World Trade Organization, Technical Circular (Works) No. 2/2014. Hong Kong: Development Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Drew DS, Fellows RF. 1996. Feedback in construction contract bidding. In: Chang WP, editor. Construction modernization and education: Proceedings CIB International Conference, October 21–24, China Architectural & Building Press, Beijing. p. 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh SM, Basamji M, Haj Ahmad A, Zarif N. 2019. Key contractor selection criteria for green construction projects in the UAE. Int J Constr Manage. 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1610545.
   Google Scholar
• Environment, Transport and Works Bureau. 2002. Feedback and debriefing to unsuccessful bidders for consultancy agreements and works contracts, Technical Circular (Works) No. 42/2002. Hong Kong: Environment, Transport and Works Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau. 2020a. Tender procedures for government procurement. Hong Kong: Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau. 2020b. Guide to procurement. Hong Kong: Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Fu WK, Drew DS, Lo HP. 2002. The effect of experience on contractors' competitiveness in recurrent bidding. Constr Manage Econ. 20(8):655–666.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Authority. 2019. Procurement policies and principles. Hong Kong: Housing Authority; [accessed 2020 Nov 15]. https://www.housingauthority.gov.hk/en/business-partnerships/procurement-principles/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• IMF: SDR valuation. Washington: International Monetary Fund; [accessed 2020 Nov 15]. https://www.imf.org/external/np/fin/data/rms_sdrv.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Levin D. 2002. Bidding in common-value auctions: A survey of experimental research. In: Kagel JH, Levin D, editors. Common Value Auctions and the Winner’s Curse. Princeton: Princeton University Press; p. 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kog F, Yaman H. 2016. A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model. ECAM. 23(6):709–726.
   Google Scholar
• Lo HP, Drew D, Fu WK. 2000. A handbook of feedback information for construction contract bidding. In Serpell A, editor. Information and Communication in Construction Procurement: CIB W92 Procurement System Symposium, Santiago, April 24–27, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile. p. 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe DJ, Skitmore M. 2006. Bidding. In Lowe D, Leiringer R, editors. Commercial management of projects: Defining the Discipline. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; p. 356–389.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli M, Antoniou F. 2019. Improving public works’ value for money: a new procurement strategy. Int J Mod Phys B. 13(1):85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Weber RJ. 1982. The value of information in a sealed-bid auction. J Math Econ. 10(1):105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oo BL. 2017. Release of construction clients’ pre-tender cost estimates: an experimental study. Constr Econ Build. 17(4):37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oo BL, Abdul-Aziz AR, Lim YM. 2011. Information feedback and learning in construction bidding. Constr Econ Build. 11(3):34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Oo BL, Drew DS, Lo HP. 2008. A comparison of contractors’ decision to bid behaviour according to different market environments. Int J Project Manage. 26(4):439–447.
   Google Scholar
• Oo BL, Drew DS, Runeson G. 2010. Competitor analysis in construction bidding. Constr Manage Econ. 28(12):1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Oo BL, Ling FYY, Soo A. 2014. Information feedback and bidders’ competitiveness in construction bidding. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 21(5):571–585.
   Google Scholar
• Oo BL, Ling FYY, Soo A. 2015. Construction procurement: modelling bidders’ learning in recurrent bidding. Constr Econ Build. 15(4):16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oo BL, Lo HP, Lim BTH. 2012. The effect of bidding success in construction bidding. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 19(1):25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Park WR, Chapin WB. 1992. Construction bidding: strategic pricing for profit. New York [NY]: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saini V, Suter JF. 2015. Capacity constraints and information revelation in procurement auctions. Econ Inq. 53(2):1236–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo A, Oo BL. 2010. The effect of information feedback in construction bidding. Australas J Constr Econ Build. 10(1/2):65–100.
   Google Scholar
• Watt DJ, Kayis B, Willey K. 2010. The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. Int J Project Manage. 28(1):51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CH, Holt GD, Harris P. 2001. Multi‐criteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences. Eng Const Arch Man. 8(4):257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Donohue JM, Fry TD, Whitcomb KM. 2020. To thine own self be true: asymmetric information in procurement auctions. Prod Oper Manag. 29(7):1679–1701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu WD, Wang KW. 2012. Best value or lowest bid? A quantitative perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(1):128–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar