The compounding effect of multiple disruptions on construction projects

References

• Abdel-Hamid M, Abdelhaleem HM. 2020. Impact of poor labor productivity on construction project cost. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1788757.
   Google Scholar
• Abotaleb IS, El-Adaway IH. 2018a. Managing construction projects through dynamic modeling: reviewing the existing body of knowledge and deriving future research directions. J Manage Eng. 34(6):04018033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abotaleb IS, El-Adaway IH. 2018b. First attempt toward a holistic understanding of the interdependent rippled impacts associated with out-of-sequence work in construction projects: system dynamics modeling approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(9):04018084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kofahi ZG, Mahdavian A, Oloufa A. 2020. System dynamics modeling approach to quantify change orders impact on labor productivity 1: principles and model development comparative study. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1711494.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard G. 2000. The last planner system of production control [dissertation]. Birmingham (UK): University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard G, Howell G. 1998. Shielding production: essential step in production control. J Constr Eng Manage. 124(1):11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braimah N. 2008. An investigation into the use of construction delay and disruption analysis methodologies [dissertation]. Wolverhampton (UK): University of Wolverhampton.
   Google Scholar
• Braimah N. 2014. Understanding construction delay analysis and the role of preconstruction programming. J Manage Eng. 30(5):04014023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burati JL, Jr Farrington JJ, Ledbetter WB. 1992. Causes of quality deviations in design and construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 118(1):34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr A, Castro AM. 2016. Delay and disruption in construction contracts. London: Informa Law from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CL, Ogunlana SO, Saeed K. 1991. Construction project management: a system dynamics model. System dynamics 91. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on System Dynamics; Bangkok, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology. p. 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Dabirian S, Abbaspour S, Khanzadi M, Ahmadi M. 2019. Dynamic modelling of human resource allocation in construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616411.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Mandal SN, Thanikal JV, Saurabh K. 2019. Evolution of studies in construction productivity: a systematic literature review (2006–2017). Ain Shams Eng J. 10(3):555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Pandey AK, Mandal SN, Bansal S. 2017. A study of enabling factors affecting construction productivity: Indian scenario. Int J Civ Eng Technol. 8(6):741–758.
   Google Scholar
• Ecem Yildiz A, Dikmen I, Talat Birgonul M. 2020. Using system dynamics for strategic performance management in construction. J Manage Eng. 36(2):04019051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemadinia H, Tavakolan M. 2021. Using a hybrid system dynamics and interpretive structural modeling for risk analysis of design phase of the construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. 21(1):93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester JW. 1961. Industrial dynamics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gharib S. 2021. Using system dynamics to study the effect of change orders on labor productivity [master's thesis]. Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1559.
   Google Scholar
• Goldratt EM. 2017. Critical chain: a business novel. London: Routledge.‏
   Google Scholar
• Ibbs W, Berry M, Sun X. 2017. Visualizing skipped and out-of-sequence work. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 9(4):05017006.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner MI, Madachy RJ, Raffo DM. 1999. Software process simulation modeling: why? What, how? J Syst Software. 46(2–3):91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Chang S, Castro-Lacouture D. 2020. Dynamic modeling for analyzing impacts of skilled labor shortage on construction project management. J Manage Eng. 36(1):04019035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi KP, Mani N, Rojas EM, Foster ET. 2017. Optimal productivity in labor-intensive construction operations: pilot study. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(3):04016107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon H, Osman H, Georgy M, Elsaid M. 2018. System dynamics approach for forecasting performance of construction projects. J Manage Eng. 34(1):04017049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu C. 2018. Decomposition of temporal changes in construction labour productivity. Int J Constr Manage. 18(1):65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mitropoulos P, Nichita T. 2010. Critical concerns of production control system on projects with labor constraints: lessons from a residential case study. J Manage Eng. 26(3):153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi S, Nasirzadeh F, Golkhoo F. 2017. Modeling labor productivity in construction projects using hybrid SD-DES approach. Sci Iran. 24(6):2752–2761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir MK, Hadikusumo BH. 2019. System dynamics model of contractual relationships between owner and contractor in construction projects. J Manage Eng. 35(1):04018052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Khanzadi M, Mir M. 2018. A hybrid simulation framework for modelling construction projects using agent-based modelling and system dynamics: an application to model construction workers' safety behaviour. Int J Constr Manage. 18(2):132–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ogunlana S, Lim J, Saeed K. 1998. Desman: a dynamic model for managing civil engineering design projects. Comput Struct. 67(5):401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwal A, Parsamehr M, Szostopal D, Ruparathna R, Hewage K. 2020. The integration of building information modeling (BIM) and system dynamic modeling to minimize construction waste generation from change orders. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1854930.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson S, Nance RE, Paul RJ, Pidd M, Taylor SJ. 2004. Simulation model reuse: definitions, benefits and obstacles. Simul Modell Pract Theory. 12(7–8):479–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rød B, Lange D, Theocharidou M, Pursiainen C. 2020. From risk management to resilience management in critical infrastructure. J Manage Eng. 36(4):04020039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seresht NG, Fayek AR. 2018. Dynamic modeling of multifactor construction productivity for equipment-intensive activities. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(9):04018091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001549.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiei I, Eshtehardian E, Nasirzadeh F, Arabi S. 2020. Dynamic modeling to reduce the cost of quality in construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1845425.
   Google Scholar
• Sing MC, Love PE, Edwards DJ, Liu J. 2016. Dynamic modeling of workforce planning for infrastructure projects. J Manage Eng. 32(6):04016019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soewin E, Chinda T. 2020. Development of a construction performance index in the construction industry: system dynamics modelling approach. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1742633.
   Google Scholar
• Song L, AbouRizk SM. 2008. Measuring and modeling labor productivity using historical data. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(10):786–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto L. 2007. Construction design as a process for flow: applying lean principles to construction design [Master. thesis]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D, Gilks WR, Richardson S, editors. 1995. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14835.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman JD. 1992. Systems dynamic modeling for project management. Working paper. Cambridge (MA): Systems Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor T, Ford D. 2008. Managing tipping point dynamics in complex construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(6):421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Maloney WF, Horner RMW, Smith GR, Handa VK, Sanders SR. 1990. Modeling construction labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 116(4):705–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Oloufa AA. 1995. Labor productivity, disruptions, and the ripple effect. Cost Eng. 37(12):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Sanders SR, Bilal S. 1992. Comparison of labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 118(4):635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Yiakoumis I. 1987. Factor model of construction productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 113(4):623–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Završki I. 1999. Construction baseline productivity: theory and practice. J Constr Eng Manage. 125(5):295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas HR. 1992. Effects of scheduled overtime on labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 118(1):60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahabi A, Nasirzadeh F, Mills A. 2020. Impact of project briefing clarity on construction project performance. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1802681.
   Google Scholar
• Vitharana VHP, Chinda T. 2021. Development of a lower back pain prevention index for heavy equipment operators in the construction industry: system dynamics modelling. Int J Constr Manage. 21(7):677–693.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yuan H. 2017. System dynamics approach for investigating the risk effects on schedule delay in infrastructure projects. J Manage Eng. 33(1):04016029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar