Redesigning the virtual organisational structure for the management of prefabricated buildings

References

• Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. 2008. Stakeholder salience in global projects. Int J Project Manage. 26(5):509–516.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelmageed S, Zayed T. 2020. A study of literature in modular integrated construction - Critical review and future directions. J Cleaner Prod. 277:124044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arashpour M, Abbasi B, Arashpour M, Reza Hosseini M, Yang R. 2017. Integrated management of on-site, coordination and off-site uncertainty: theorizing risk analysis within a hybrid project setting. Int J Project Manage. 35(4):647–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Gao Z, Smith G. 2021. Integrated implementation of Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) and lean project delivery system (LPDS). J Build Eng. 39:102252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmar ME, Hanna AS, Loh W-Y. 2016. Evaluating integrated project delivery using the project quarterback rating. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(1):04015046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubry M, Lavoie-Tremblay M. 2018. Rethinking organizational design for managing multiple projects. Int J Project Manage. 36(1):12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerik-Gerber B, Ku K, Jazizadeh F. 2012. BIM-enabled virtual and collaborative construction engineering and management. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 138(3):234–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist T, Farashah AD, Thomas J. 2018. Feeling good, being good and looking good: motivations for, and benefits from, project management certification. Int J Project Manage. 36(3):498–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. 2002. Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B. 2018. The science of organizational design: fit between structure and coordination. J Org Design. 7(1):5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Butts CT. 2008. Social network analysis: a methodological introduction. Asian J Soc Psychol. 11(1):13–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che Ibrahim CKI, Costello SB, Wilkinson S. 2018. Making sense of team integration practice through the “lived experience” of alliance project teams. ECAM. 25(5):598–622.
   Google Scholar
• Che Ibrahim CKI, Rahmat A, Belayutham S, Costello SB. 2020. Developing a temporary multi-organization integration performance index for delivering construction projects in Malaysia. Int J Constr Manage. 20(5):412–428.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-J, Huang J-W. 2007. How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective. Int J Inf Manage. 27(2):104–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng EWL, Li H, Drew DS, Yeung N. 2001. Infrastructure of partnering for construction projects. J Manage Eng. 17(4):229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinyio E, Olomolaiye P. 2010. Construction stakeholder management. A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cicmil S, Williams T, Thomas J, Hodgson D. 2006. Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. Int J Project Manage. 24(8):675–686.
   Google Scholar
• Demirkesen S, Ozorhon B. 2017. Impact of integration management on construction project management performance. Int J Project Manage. 35(8):1639–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayegh A, El-Adaway IH. 2021. Holistic study and analysis of factors affecting collaborative planning in construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 147(4):04021023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris H, Gaterell M, Hutchinson D. 2019. Investigating underlying factors of collaboration for construction projects in emerging economies using exploratory factor analysis. Int J Constr Manage.1643. :1–13. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1635758
   Google Scholar
• Franz B, Leicht R, Molenaar K, Messner J. 2017. Impact of team integration and group cohesion on project delivery performance. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(1):04016088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García de Soto B, Agustí-Juan I, Joss S, Hunhevicz J. 2019. Implications of Construction 4.0 to the workforce and organizational structures. Int J Constr Manag. :1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodrati N, Yiu TW, Wilkinson S, Shahbazpour M. 2018. Role of management strategies in improving labor productivity in general construction projects in New Zealand: managerial perspective. J Manage Eng. 34(6):04018035. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1616414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurianova E, Mechtcheriakova S. 2015. Design of organizational structures of management according to strategy of development of the enterprises. Procedia Econ Finance. 24:395–401.
   Google Scholar
• Han SH, Chin KH, Chae MJ. 2007. Evaluation of CITIS as a collaborative virtual organization for construction project management. Autom Constr. 16(2):199–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Shen GQ, Li Z, Zhang B, Zhang W. 2018. Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: a cost–benefit analysis. J Cleaner Prod. 172:649–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Shen GQ, Mao C, Li Z, Li K. 2016. Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model. J Cleaner Prod. 112:2198–2207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao Y-C, Wu M-H. 2020. How organizational structure and strategic alignment influence new product success. MD. 58(1):182–200.
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Chong H-Y. 2020. Integrated frameworks of construction procurement systems for off-site manufacturing projects: social network analysis. Int J Constr Manage. 1766188.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Zhao X, Tan LLG. 2015. Green building projects: schedule performance, influential factors and solutions. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 22(3):327–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GR. 2013. Organizational theory, design, and change. Vol. 7. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Ilozor B. 2020. Performance outcome assessment of the integrated project delivery (IPD) method for commercial construction projects in USA. Int J Constr Manage. (3):1827340.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J-S, Kim Y-S. 2017. Analysis of cost-increasing risk factors in modular construction in Korea using FMEA. KSCE J Civ Eng. 21(6):1999–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung M-y, Yu J, Liang Q. 2013. Improving public engagement in construction development projects from a stakeholder's perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(11):04013019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, Teo EAL. 2019. Managing critical drivers for building information modelling implementation in the Singapore construction industry: an organizational change perspective. Int J Constr Manage. 19(3):240–256.
   Google Scholar
• London K, Pablo Z. 2017. An actor–network theory approach to developing an expanded conceptualization of collaboration in industrialized building housing construction. Constr Manage Econ. 35(8–9):553–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddaloni FD, Davis K. 2017. The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance. Int J Project Manage. 35(8):1537–1556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammen A, Rupawala M. 2015. Cost comparison of modular construction with ordinary site construction. Int J Sci Eng Res. 6(12):326–328.
   Google Scholar
• Mao C, Xie F, Hou L, Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. 2016. Cost analysis for sustainable off-site construction based on a multiple-case study in China. Habitat Int. 57:215–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow SL, Lacerenza CN, Salas E. 2017. Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda. Hum Res Manage Rev. 27(4):575–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa HA, Molenaar KR, Alarcón LF. 2019. Comparative analysis between integrated project delivery and lean project delivery. Int J Project Manage. 37(3):395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell PK, Bradley RA, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. AMR. 22(4):853–886.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro GP, Hopkins A, Frutuoso e Melo PF. 2020. How do organizational structures impact operational safety? Part 2 – designing structures that strengthen safety. Saf Sci. 123:104534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa S, Chileshe N, Abdelhamid T. 2016. Lean and agile integration within offsite construction using discrete event simulation: a systematic literature review. CI. 16(4):483–525.
   Google Scholar
• Musawir A, Serra CEM, Zwikael O, Ali I. 2017. Project governance, benefit management, and project success: towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation. Int J Project Manage. 35(8):1658–1672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami MR. 2008. Virtual organizations: an overview. International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing; Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Okakpu A, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J, Haar J, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Rehman AU. 2020. Risk factors that influence adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for refurbishment of complex building projects: stakeholders perceptions. Int J Constr Manage. 1795985.
   Google Scholar
• Oppong GD, Chan APC, Dansoh A. 2017. A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 35(6):1037–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan W, Gibb AGF, Dainty ARJ. 2007. Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction. Constr Manage Econ. 25(2):183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin O, Miller D, Mohamed S. 2018. Value-based modelling: an Australian case of off-site manufactured buildings. Int J Constr Manage. 18(1):34–52.
   Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J. 1974. The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: the case of a university. Adm Sci Q. 19(4):453–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samani P, Gregory J, Leal V, Mendes A, Correia N. 2018. Lifecycle cost analysis of prefabricated composite and masonry buildings: comparative study. J Archit Eng. 24(1):05017012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staykova G, Underwood J. 2017. Assessing collaborative performance on construction projects through knowledge exchange: a UK rail strategic alliance case study. ECAM. 24(6):968–987.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Ren X, Anumba CJ. 2019. Analysis of knowledge-transfer mechanisms in construction project cooperation networks. J Manage Eng. 35(2):04018061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundquist V, Hulthén K, Gadde LE. 2018. From project partnering towards strategic supplier partnering. ECAM. 25(3):358–373.
   Google Scholar
• Teng Y, Mao C, Liu G, Wang X. 2017. Analysis of stakeholder relationships in the industry chain of industrialized building in China. J Cleaner Prod. 152:387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JL, Strickland AJ. 1999. Strategic management. New York: Richard D Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Tran Q, Tian Y. 2013. Organizational Structure: influencing Factors and Impact on a Firm. AJIBM. 03(02):229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Ujene AO, Edike UE. 2015. Relationships among internal stakeholders in construction projects: a cognitive evaluation for sustainable team integration in Nigeria. Int J Constr Manage. 15(1):71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman B. 1983. Network analysis: some basic principles. Sociol Theory. 1(1):155–200.
   Google Scholar
• Whang S-W, Park KS, Kim S. 2019. Critical success factors for implementing integrated construction project delivery. ECAM. 26(10):2432–2446.
   Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQ, Osei-Kyei R. 2020. Quantitative evaluation and ranking of the critical success factors for modular integrated construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. 1766190.
   Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Mahmud AT. 2019. Critical risk factors in the application of modular integrated construction: a systematic review. Int J Constr Manage. 1613212.
   Google Scholar
• Xue H, Zhang SJ, Su YK, Wu ZZ, Yang RJ. 2018a. Effect of stakeholder collaborative management on off-site construction cost performance. J Cleaner Prod. 184:490–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue X, Zhang X, Wang L, Skitmore M, Wang Q. 2018b. Analyzing collaborative relationships among industrialized construction technology innovation organizations: a combined SNA and SEM approach. J Cleaner Prod. 173:265–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RJ, Shen GQP. 2015. Framework for stakeholder management in construction projects. J Manage Eng. 31(4):04014064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RJ, Wang Y, Jin X-H. 2014. Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviors, and decision-making strategies in construction projects: importance and correlations in practice. Proj Manage J. 45(3):74–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung JFY, Chan APC, Chan DWM. 2009. A computerized model for measuring and benchmarking the partnering performance of construction projects. Autom Constr. 18(8):1099–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JH, Yoo SE, Kim JI, Kim TW. 2019. Exploring the factor-performance relationship of integrated project delivery projects: a qualitative comparative analysis. Proj Manage J. 50(3):335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeffane R. 1992. Organizational structures: design in the nineties. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 13(6):18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Platten A, Shen L. 2011. Green property development practice in China: costs and barriers. Build Environ. 46(11):2153–2160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Yang B, McLean GN. 2003. Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of knowledge management. J Oper Manage. 21(3):281–306.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong RY, Peng Y, Xue F, Fang J, Zou W, Luo H, Thomas Ng S, Lu W, Shen GQP, Huang GQ. 2017. Prefabricated construction enabled by the internet-of-things. Autom Constr. 76:59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou JX, Shen GQ, Yoon SH, Jin X. 2021. Customization of on-site assembly services by integrating the internet of things and BIM technologies in modular integrated construction. Autom Constr. 126:103663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwikael O, Smyrk J. 2015. Project governance: balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. Int J Project Manage. 33(4):852–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar