An investigation of safety climate in Chinese major construction projects

References

• Alruqi WM, Hallowell MR, Techera U. 2018. Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Saf Sci. 109:165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beus JM, Payne SC, Arthur W, Jr., Muñoz GJ. 2017. The development and validation of a cross-industry safety climate measure: Resolving conceptual and operational issues. J Manage. 45(5):1987–2013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhagwat K, Delhi VSK. 2021. Review of construction safety performance measurement methods and practices: a science mapping approach. Int J Construct Manage.
   Google Scholar
• Chan M. 2011. Fatigue: the most critical accident risk in oil and gas construction. Construct Manage Econ. 29(4):341–353.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, McCabe B, Hyatt D. 2018. A resilience safety climate model predicting construction safety performance. Saf Sci. 109:434–445.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng EWL, Li H, Fang DP, Xie F. 2004. Construction safety management: An exploratory study from China. Construct Innov. 4(4):229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry RM, Fang D, Lingard H. 2009. Measuring safety climate of a construction company. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(9):890–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigularov K, Chen P, Rosecrance J. 2010. The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: A multi-level study. Accid Anal Prev. 42(5):1498–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper MD, Phillips RA. 2004. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. J Safety Res. 35(5):497–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Soc Rev. 48(2):147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Regional policy. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/projects/major_projects/index_en.cfm#:∼:text=Major%20projects%20are%20generally%20large,investments%20and%20research%20%26%20development%20projects. [accessed 2021 Jan 8].
   Google Scholar
• Famakin IO, Aigbavboa C, Molusiwa R. (2020) Exploring challenges to implementing health and safety regulations in a developing economy. Int J of Construct Manage, DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1850201.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin R. 2015. How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? J Build Eng. 1:2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao R, Chan APC, Utama WP, Zahoor H. 2017. Workers’ perceptions of safety climate in international construction projects: Effects of nationality, religious belief, and employment mode. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(4):04016117.
   Google Scholar
• Gao J, Wang C, Li F, Feng T. 2018. Study on the mechanism between construction worker's negative emotion and organization safety performance from the perspective of safety climate. Construct Technol. 47(17):127–132. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Gazley B. 2017. The current state of interorganizational collaboration: Lessons for human service research and management. Human Serv Organ Manage. 41(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. 2003. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber LM, Macionis JJ. 2010. Sociology. 7th Canadian ed. Canada: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gu DP, Zhao H, Zhang S, Zhang SY. 2020. Research on the critical success factors of major construction project: Based on the analysis of Chinese and international Cases. Engin Econ. 30(10):31–36. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Yin Z, Liu J, Jin R, Gidado K, Painting N, Yang Y, Yan L. 2019. Defining and testing a safety cognition framework incorporating safety hazard perception. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(12):04019081.
   Google Scholar
• He C, McCabe B, Jia G, Sun J. 2020. Effects of safety climate and safety behavior on safety outcomes between supervisors and construction workers. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(1):04019092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker S, Goldenhar L. 2014. Understanding safety culture and safety climate in construction: Existing evidence and a path forward. Literature Review Summary for Safety Culture/Climate Workshop, June 11–12, 2013; Washington, DC., January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 1984. Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. 2014. Safety-I and Safety-II: The past and future of safety management. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ji C, Han R, Wu W, Li Q, Deng G. 2015. Design and application of safety climate survey instrument for construction team. China Safety Sci J. 25(5):138–144. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Jia AY, Rowlinson S, Loosemore M, Xu M, Li B, Gibb A. 2017. Institutions and institutional logics in construction safety management: The case of climatic heat stress. Construct Manage Econ. 35(6):338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns R. 2005. One size doesn’t fit all: Selecting response scales for attitude items. J Elections, Public Opin Parties. 15(2):237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp EA. 2012. The influence of supervisor leadership practices and perceived group safety climate on employee safety performance. Saf Sci. 50(4):1119–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Fan M, Wu X. 2018. Effect of social capital between construction supervisors and workers on workers’ safety behavior. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(4):04018014.
   Google Scholar
• Liao PC, Lei G, Fang D, Liu W. 2014. The relationship between communication and construction safety climate in China. KSCE J Civ Eng. 18(4):887–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao PC, Lei G, Xue J, Fang D. 2015. Influence of person-organizational fit on construction safety climate. J Manage Eng. 31(4):04014049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H, Li N, Fang D, Wu C. 2018. Impact of safety climate on types of safety motivation and performance: Multigroup invariance analysis. J Manage Eng. 34(3):04018002.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Cooke T, Blismas N. 2009. Group-level safety climate in the Australian construction industry: Within-group homogeneity and between-group differences in road construction and maintenance. Construct Manage Econ. 27(4):419–432.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard HC, Cooke T, Blismas N. 2010. Safety climate in conditions of construction subcontracting: a multi-level analysis. Construct Manage Econ. 28(8):813–825.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Zhang R, Harley J, Blismas N, Wakefield R. 2014. Health and safety culture. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Construction Work Health and Safety, RMIT.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Walker BM, Mills AJ, Walker DHT. 2014. Enabling construction innovation: The role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances. Construct Manage Econ. 32(3):229–245.
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore M, Higgon D, Osborne J. 2020. Managing new social procurement imperatives in the Australian construction industry. ECAM. 27(10):3075–3093.
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore M, Lim B. 2017. Linking corporate social responsibility and organisational performance in the construction industry. Construct Manage Econ. 35(3):90–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore M, Sunindijo R, Zhang S. 2020. Comparative analysis of safety climate in the Chinese, Australian and Indonesia construction industries. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(12):04020129.
   Google Scholar
• Major Projects Association. 2020. Project terminology. London, UK: Major Projects Association. https://majorprojects.org/project-terminology/ [accessed 2021 Jan 8].
   Google Scholar
• Martine B, Hannevik, JAL, Roald B, Cato AB, Hoff T. 2014. Organizational climate in large-scale projects in the oil and gas industry: A competing values perspective, Int J of Pro Manage. 32(4):687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.006.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD). 2018. Notice on implementing special management action of construction safety. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201803/t20180315_235396.html. [accessed 2020 Feb 11]. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD). 2019. Notice on the special governance action of construction safety and production safety accidents of building projects in 2018. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201903/t20190326_239913.html. [accessed 2020 Jan 26]. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ngai P, Huilin L. 2010. A culture of violence: The labor subcontracting system and collective action by construction workers in post-socialist China. China J. 64:143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Phua F. 2018. The role of organizational climate in socially embedding construction firms’ sustainability goals. Construct Manage Econ. 36(7):409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin A, Babbie ER. 2008. Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Safe Work Australia. 2012. Australian work health and safety strategy 2012–2022. Sydney, Australia: Safe Work Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Schwatka NV, Hecker S, Goldenhar LM. 2016. Defining and measuring safety climate: A review of the construction industry literature. Ann Occup Hyg. 60(5):537–550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott WR. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Seo D, Torabi M, Blair E, Ellis N. 2004. A cross-validation of safety climate scale using confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Safety Res. 35(4):427–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Tuuli MM, Xia B, Koh TY, Rowlinson S. 2015. Toward a model for forming psychological safety climate in construction project management. Int J Project Manage. 33(1):223–235..
   Google Scholar
• Shi X, Wang P, Liu C. 2017. Study on the influence of safety climate on the safety behaviours of construction professionals in subway project. Project Manage Technol. (15):48–54. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Zhong Z, Li L. 2019. Prediction of construction workers' unsafe behavior based on team safety climate. J Safety Sci Technol. 15(8):156–161. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ting M. 2010. Building on shaky ground: Quality and safety in China’s construction industry in the wake of the Wenchuan and Yushu earthquakes. CEB. 10(3):62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K. 2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei W, Ma Y, Ma L. 2013. Empirical study on construction site safety climate measurement. Construct Technol. 42(18):100–104. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson AM, Feyer A, Cairns D, Biancotti D. 1997. The development of a measure of safety climate: The role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Saf Sci. 25(1-3):15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Yang F, Yang B. 2018. SEM study on the spread of human factors risk of subway construction under the influence of safety climate of construction team. J Civil Engin Manage. 35(2):39–44. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yang G, Wei Y. 2017. Analysis on the relationship between the construction safety climate and construction safety behaviors. J Engin Manage. 31(3):124–129. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ye G, Fu Y, Wang Y, Gong X, Tang X. 2019. Literature review of construction safety research based on CiteSpace from a behaviour perspective. Safety and Environ Engin. 26(4):127–134. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yu G, Li Y. 2009. The construction and test of three-c model of safety climate. China Safety Sci J. 19(9):28–36. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zahoor H, Chan APC, Utama WP, Gao R, Memon SA. 2017. Determinants of safety climate for building projects: SEM-based cross-validation study. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(6):05017005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Duan H, Zhao X, Xia B, Feng Y, Galvin S. 2021. Learning on rework management of construction projects: A case study. Int J Construct Manage. 21(3):246–260..
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Fang D. 2013. A continuous behavior-based safety strategy for persistent safety improvement in construction industry. Autom Constr. 34:101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang L. 2007. Study on the influence of enterprise safety climate on enterprise safety behaviour. J Safety Sci Technol. 3(1):106–110. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Fang D, Fang J. 2014. Behaviour relationship model and policy improvements related to stakeholder affecting construction safety. China Civil Engin J. 47(9):128–134. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Fang D, Mohamed S. 2011. Safety climate improvement: Case study in a Chinese construction company. J Constr Eng Manage. 137(1):86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. 1980. Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 65(1):96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G. 2010. Group leader as gatekeepers: Testing safety climate variations across levels of analysis. J Appl Psychol. 59(4):647–673.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G. 2005. A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J Appl Psychol. 90(4):616–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, Sunindijo RY. 2015. Strategic safety management in construction and engineering. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar