Technological transformation of the construction sector: a conceptual approach

References

• Agarwal R, Chandrasekaran S, Sridhar M. 2016. The digital future of construction. Voices Global Infrastruct Init. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Aghimien D, Aigbavboa C, Oke A, Thwala W, Moripe P. 2020. Digitalization of construction organisations – a case for digital partnering. Int J Constr Manage. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1745134.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe LE, Sward A. 2019. Collaborative project delivery models and the role of routines in institutionalizing partnering. Project Manage J. 50(2):161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe L, Hakan EH, Jahre M. 2013. A critical discussion of models for conceptualizing the economic logic of construction. Constr Manage Econ. 31(2):104–118.
   Google Scholar
• Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M. 2006. Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 47(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila Delgado JM, Oyedele L, Ajayi A, Akanbi L, Akinade O, Bilal M, Owolabi H. 2019. Robotics and automated systems in construction: understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption. J Build Eng. 26:100868.
   Google Scholar
• Denicol J, Davies A, Krystallis I. 2020. What are the causes and cure of poor megaproject performance? A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project Manag J. 51(3):328–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois A, Gadde L, E. 2002. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Constr Manag Econ. 20(7):621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois A, Gadde L-E. 2001. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system-implications for productivity and innovativity. Paper for the 17th IMP Conference, 9th–11th, Sept. 2001, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund J, Kapoor R. 2019. Pursuing the new while sustaining the current: incumbent strategies and firms value during the nascent period of industry change. Business Sci. 30(2):383–404.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer M. 2016. The farmer review of the UK construction labor industry (modernize or die). UK: Construction Leadership Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gann D. 2001. Putting academic ideas into practice: technological progress and the absorptive capacity of construction organizations. Constr Manag Econ. 19(3):321–330. issue also, published online 21 Oct.2010, PP.
   Google Scholar
• Gans J. 2016. The disruption dilemma. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA. 2014. Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J Prod Innov Manag. 31(3):417–433. Vol
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidado KI. 1996. Project complexity: the focal point of construction production planning. Constr Manage Econ. 14(3):213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Hall D, Whyte M, Jennifer K, Lessing J. 2020. Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms; a comparative case study. Constr Manage Econ. 38(4):322–339. Vol., No
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin Sci Quart. 35(1):9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson G, Johnsson H, Engström D. 2014. Platform use in systems building. Constr Manage Econ. 32(1-2):70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Jones C, Lichtenstein B,B. 2008. Temporary inter-organizational projects: How temporal embeddedness enhances coordination and manage uncertainty. In Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Ring PS, editors. The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. London, England: Oxford University Press; p. 231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lekan A, Aigbavboa C, Babatunde O, Olabosipo F, Christiana A. 2020. Disruptive technological innovations in construction field and fourth industrial revolution intervention in the achievement of the sustainable development goal 9. Int J Constr Manag. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1819522.
   Google Scholar
• Lenka S, Parida V, Wincent J. 2017. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms. Psychol Mark. 34Issue (1):92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing J, Brege S. 2018. Industrialized building companies’ business models: multiple case study of swedish and North American companies. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(2):05017019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meacham B, Van Straalen J, Usbrand J. 2018. A socio-technical system framework for risk-informed performance-based building regulation. Build Res Inform. 46(4):444–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollaoglu S, Sparkling A, Thomas S. 2015. An inquiry to move an underutilized best practice forward: barriers to partnering in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Project Manag J. 46(1):issue–issu1. Vol.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasila M, Cloete C. 2018. Adoption of building information modelling in the construction industry in Kenya. Acta Structilia 25(2):1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work, organization studies. J Sage. 28(9):1435–1448.
   Google Scholar
• Pan W, Chen L, Zhan W. 2019. PESTEL analysis of construction productivity enhancement strategies: a case study of three economies. J Manag Eng. 35(1):05018013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preez D, Niek D, Louw L, Essmann H. 2006. An innovation process model for improving innovation capability. J High Technol Manag Res. 17:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkka L, Ristimaki M, Rajakallio K, Junnila S. 2016. Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry. Constr Manag Econ. 34 (2):129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson D, Ulrich K. 1998. Planning for product platforms. Sloan Manag Rev. 39(4):19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. 1995. The diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney M,S. 1998. Leveraged high-variety strategies: from portfolio thinking to platform thinking. J Acad Market Sci. 26(1):54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweber L. 2015. Putting theory to work: The use of theory in construction research. Constr Manag Econ. 33 (10):840–860. Routledge)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffer AA, Levitt RE. 2010. How Industry structure retards diffusion of innovation in construction: challenges and opportunities, Working paper # 59, August 2010, Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects (CRGP), Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter S, E. 2000. Implementation of construction innovations. Build Res Inform. 28(1):2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhardt D, Manley K, Bildsten L, Widen K. 2020. The structure of emergent prefabricated housing industries: a comparative case study of Australia and Sweden. Constr Manag Econ. 38 (6):483–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas L, DW, Autio E, Gann D,M. 2014. Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context. AMP. 28(2):198–219. No
   Google Scholar
• Turk Ž. 2021. Structured analysis of ICT adoption in the European construction industry. Int J Constr Manag. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1925396.
   Google Scholar
• Turk Ž, Klinc R. 2020. A social- product- process framework for construction. Build Res Inform. 48(7):747–762. 10.1080/09613218.2019.1691487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. 2019. How digital information transforms project delivery models. Project Manag J. 50(2):177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch G. 1994. Managing production: engineering change and stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winch G. 1998. Zephyrs of creating destruction: understanding the management of innovation construction, (Routledge) Building Research and Information, Journal homepage.
   Google Scholar
• Worsnop T, Miraglia S, Davies A. 2016. Balancing open and closed innovation in megaprojects: Insight from crossrail. Project Manag J. 47 (4):79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeleman J, Ribeirinho MJ, Rockhill D, Sjödin E, Strube G. 2020. Decoding digital transformation in construction. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/decoding-digital-transformation-in-construction.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeh H, Mirarchi C, Pavan A. 2021. BIM implementation for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Proceedings of the 2021 European Conference on Computing in Construction. Published..
   Google Scholar
• Wheelis M. 2020, March 6. Five ways digital transformation is optimizing the construction industry. GIM International. [accessed 2021 October 10] https://constructionexec.com/article/five-ways-digital-transformation-is-optimizing-the-construction-industry.
   Google Scholar
• Oti-Sarpong K, Pärn EA, Burgess G, Zaki M. 2021. Transforming the construction sector: an institutional complexity perspective. CI. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2021-0071.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Aghimien DO, Aigbavboa CO, Koloko N. 2018. Challenges of digital collaboration in the South African construction industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bandung, Indonesia, March 6-8, p. 2472–2482.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Naismith N, Azhar S, Efimova O, Raahemifar K. 2017. Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75:1046–1053..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar