Augmented reality for construction revolution – analysis of critical success factors

References

• Adascalitei I. 2018. The influence of augmented reality in construction and interpretation into smart city. Inform Econ. 22(2):55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Adedokun-Shittu NA, Ajani HA, Nuhu KM, Shittu JK. 2019. Effectiveness of mobile-based augmented reality instructional technology on geography students performance in state of Osun, Nigeria. Conference proceedings: Association for innovative Technology integration in Education, 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Aghimien D, Aigbavboa C, Oke A, Thwala W, Moripe P. 2020. Digitalization of construction organizations – a case for digital partnering. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1745134.
   Google Scholar
• Ahadzie DK, Proverbs DG, Olomolaiye PO. 2008. Critical success criteria for mass house building projects in developing countries. Int J Proj Manage. 26(6):675–687.
   Google Scholar
• Akçayır M, Akçayır G. 2017. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature. Edu Res Rev. 20:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinlolu M, Haupt TC, Edwards DJ, Simpeh F. 2020. A bibliometric review of the status and emerging research trends in construction safety management technologies. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1819584.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye A. 2000. Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Constr Manage Econ. 18(1):77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Apple. 2018. The future is here: iPhone X—Apple. Cupertino, CA: Apple.
   Google Scholar
• Arowoiya VA, Oke AE, Aigbavboa CO, Aliu J. 2020. An appraisal of the adoption of internet of things (IoT) elements for sustainable construction. J Eng Des Technol. 18 (5):1193–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banda G. 2018. A brief review of independent, dependent, and one-sample t-test. Int J Appl Math Theor Phys. 4(2):50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Behzadi A. 2016. Using augmented and virtual reality technology in the construction industry. Am J Eng Res. 5(12):350–353.
   Google Scholar
• BIS Research. 2018. Global augmented reality and mixed reality market: analysis forecast 2018–2025. https://bisresearch.com/industry-report/global-augmented-reality-mixed-reality-market-2025.html.
   Google Scholar
• Blattgerste J, Strenge B, Renner P, Pfeiffer T, Essig K. 2017. Comparing conventional and augmented reality instructions for manual assembly tasks. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. p. 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Chi HL, Kang SC, Wang X. 2013. Research trends and opportunities of augmented reality applications in architecture, engineering, and construction. Autom Constr. 33:116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danker FA, Jones O. 2014. Combining augmented reality and building information modeling – an industry perspective on the application and future directions. BIM. 2:525–536, eCAADe 32.
   Google Scholar
• Davies R. 2015. Industry 4.0: digitalisation for productivity and growth. European Parliamentary Research service (EPRS). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/it/document/EPRS_BRI(2015)568337.
   Google Scholar
• Doloi H, Iyer KC, Sawhney A. 2011. Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor’s performance on project success. Int J Proj Manag. 29(6):687–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egege CC, Ayegba MO, Omange OM, Ntem TS. 2018. Overview of ICT usage in Construction Industry: a case study of Lagos State, Nigeria. Int J Adv Sci Res Eng. 4(9):31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Egger J, Masood T. 2018. Augmented reality in support of intelligent manufacturing – a systematic literature review. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; p. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Funk M, Bachler A, Bachler L, Kosch T, Heidenreich T, Schmidt A. 2017. Working with augmented reality? A long-term analysis of in-situ instructions at the assembly workplace. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. p. 222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Gambo M. 2017. Impact of information communication technology on building construction project delivery in Nigeria. Technology (IJOSEET).
   Google Scholar
• Gandolfi E. 2018. Virtual reality and augmented reality. In: Kennedy K, Ferdig RE, editors. Handbook of Research on K-12 online and blending learning. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press, Carnegie Mellon University; p. 545–561.
   Google Scholar
• Grubert J, Langlotz T, Zollmann SJ, Regenbrecht H. 2016. Towards persuasive augmented reality: context-awareness in augmented reality. IEEE Trans Visual Comp Graph. 23(99):1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2543720.
   Google Scholar
• Kivrak SA. 2013. Augmented reality system application in construction project activities. 30th international symposium on Automation and Robotics in construction and mining, Held in construction with the 23rd world mining congress. ISARC 2013. p. 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kodeboyina SM, Varghese K. 2016. Low cost augmented reality framework for construction application. In ISARC. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Vol. 33, pp. 1. Vilnius Gedminas Technology University.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaran G, Santhi KR, Anand PMS. 2007. Impact of Augmented reality (AR) in civil engineering. Adv Mat Res. 18–19:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Yi W, Chi H-L, Wang X, Chan APC. 2018. A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Autom Constr. 86:150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewski M, Kacalak W. 2017. Smart control of lifting devices using patterns and antipatterns. Adv Intell Syst Comput. 573:486–493.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez H, Skoumetou D, Hyppola J, Laukkanen S, Heikkila A. 2014. Drivers and bottlenecks in the adoption of augmented reality applications. J Multimed Theory Appl. 2(1):27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Masood T, Egger J. 2019. Augmented reality in support of Industry 4.0—implementation challenges and success factors. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 58:181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekhi M, Lemieux A. 2014. Augmented reality: applications challenges and future trends. J Appl Comp Sci. 2:205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Meža S, Žiga T, Dolenc M. 2014. Component-based engineering of a mobile BIM-based augmented reality system. Autom Constr. 42:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noruwa BI, Arewa AO, Merschbrock C. 2020. Effects of emerging technologies in minimizing variations in construction projects in the UK. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1772530.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Arowoiya VA, Akomolafe OT. 2020. An empirical study on challenges to the adoption of the Internet of Things in the Nigerian construction industry. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1819117.
   Google Scholar
• Oluwaranti AI, Obasa AA, Olaoye AO, Ayeni S. 2015. Architectural model for an augmented reality-based mobile learning application. J Multidiscip Eng Sci Technol. 2 (7):1972–1977.
   Google Scholar
• Park C-S, Kim H-J. 2013. A framework for construction safety management and visualization system. Autom Constr. 33:95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quandt M, Ait A, Meyer L, Freitag M. 2017. Success factor s for the development of augmented reality-based assistance systems for maintenance services. Schmitt, RF, Schuh, G. (Hrsg.) 7:175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Radkowski R, Stritzke C. 2012. Interactive hand gesture-based assembly for augmented reality applications. ACHI 2012 – 5th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. p. 303–308.
   Google Scholar
• Real J, Marcelino L. 2011. Augmented Reality Systems for Inventorying 6th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Renner P, Pfeiffer T. 2017. Augmented reality assistance in the central field-of-view outperforms peripheral displays for order picking: results from a virtual reality simulation study, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). p. 176–181.
   Google Scholar
• Statt N. 2017. Samsung partners with Google to bring ARCore platform to Galaxy devices. The Verge. 18 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltz M-H, Giannikas V, McFarlane D, Strachan J, Um J, Srinivasan R. (2017). Augmented Reality in warehouse operations: opportunities and barriers. IFAC-Papers on Line 50:12979–12984.
   Google Scholar
• Suk SJ, Ford G, Kang Y, Ahn YH. 2017. A study on the Effect of the use of Augmented reality on student’s quantity take-off performance. ISARC Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation, Robotics, and Construction (Vol. 34). Vilnius.
   Google Scholar
• Syberfeldt A, Holm M, Danielsson O, Wang L, Brewster RL. 2016. Support systems on the industrial shop-floors of the future – operators’ perspective on augmented reality. Procedia CIRP. 44:108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berlo L. 2009. C2B: augmented reality on the construction site. 9th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:e7c27bbe-e1a3-4f46-b01b-df5d1437f273.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Dunston PS. 2007. Design, strategies, and issues towards an augmented reality-based construction training platform. J Inf Technol Constr. 12(25):363–380.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Love PE, Kim MJ, Park C-S, Sing C-P, Hou L. 2013. A conceptual framework for integrating building information modeling with augmented reality. Autom Constr. 34:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ong SK, Nee AYC. 2016. Real-virtual components interaction for assembly simulation and planning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 41:102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang S, Yang S, He W, Bai X. 2018. Mechanical assembly assistance using marker-less augmented reality system. Assem Autom. 38(1):77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams G, Gheisari M, Chen P-J, and Irizarry J. 2014. BIM2MAR: an efficient BIM translation to mobile augmented reality applications. J Manag Eng. 31:A4014009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L-C, Lin I-C, Tsai M-H. 2016. Augmented reality instruction for object assembly based on marker-less tracking. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium, 95.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh C-C, Chen Y-F. 2018. Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 132:209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainon N, Skitmore M, Mohd-Rahim FA. 2020. Critical success factors in implementing flexible IT infrastructure in the Malaysian construction industry. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1768464.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou F, Duh HB-L, Billinghurst M. 2008. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction, and display: a review of ten years of ISMAR. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar