Integrating building information modeling with value engineering to facilitate the selection of building design alternatives considering sustainability

References

• Ali AM, Negm AM, Bady MF, Ibrahim ME. 2015. Environmental life cycle assessment of a residential building in Egypt: A case study. Procedia Technol. 19(2015):349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Alzraiee H. 2020. Cost estimate system using structured query language in BIM. Int J Constr Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1823061.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri R, Sardroud JM, Soto BG. 2017. BIM-based applications of metaheuristic algorithms to support the decision-making process: uses in the planning of construction site layout. Procedia Technol. 196(2017):558–564.
   Google Scholar
• Anderluh A, Hemmelmayr VC, Rüdiger D. 2020. Analytic hierarchy process for city hub location selection - The Viennese case Analytic hierarchy process for city hub location selection - the Viennese case. Transp Res Procedia. 46(2020):77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Fthenakis V. 2013. Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: guiding the Optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy Build. 64(2013):73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Atabay S, Galipogullari N. 2013. Application of value engineering in construction projects. J Traffic Transp Eng. 1(1):39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar S. 2011. Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership Manage Eng. 11(3):241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bibri SE. 2018. The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: an analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain Cities Soc. 38(2018):230–253.
   Google Scholar
• Cecconi FR, Tagliabue LC, Maltese S, Zuccaro M. 2017. A multi-criteria framework for decision process in retrofit optioneering through interactive data flow. International High- Performance Built Environment Conference – A Sustainable Built Environment Conference 2016 Series (SBE16), iHBE 2016. Procedia Eng. 180(2017):859–869.
   Google Scholar
• Chamikara BS, Perera KS, Rodrigo MN. 2018. Competencies of the quantity surveyor in performing for sustainable construction. Int J Constr Manage.  20(3):237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Chau CK, Leung TM, Ng WY. 2015. A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Appl Energy. 143(2015):395–413.
   Google Scholar
• Chong A, Xu W, Chao S, Ngo N. 2019. Continuous-time Bayesian calibration of energy models using BIM and energy data. Energy & Buildings. 194(2019):177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Chong H, Lee C, Wang X. 2017. A mixed review of the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) for sustainability. J Cleaner Prod. 142(2017):4114–4126.
   Google Scholar
• Czmoch I, Pękala A. 2014. Traditional design versus BIM based design. XXIII R-S-P seminar, Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering (23RSP) (TFoCE 2014). Procedia Eng. 91(2014):210–215.
   Google Scholar
• Dekkiche H, Taileb A. 2016. The importance of integrating LCA into the LEED rating system. Procedia Eng. 145(2016):844–851.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman CM, Teicholz P, Sacks R. 2011. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Mumovic D. 2018. Participatory decision-support model in the context of building structural design embedding BIM with QFD. Adv Eng Inf. 38 (2018):695–711.
   Google Scholar
• Elmasoudi I, Ibrahim MG, Tokimatsu K, Elbeltagi E. 2019. Environmental impact assessment model for buildings’ construction activities. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1657256.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo K, Pierott R, Hammad A, Haddad A. 2021. Sustainable material choice for construction projects: A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment framework based on BIM and Fuzzy-AHP. Build Environ. 196:107805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan VL, Deng M, Tse KT, Chan CM, Lo IC, Cheng JP. 2018. Holistic BIM framework for sustainable low carbon design of high-rise buildings. J Cleaner Prod. 195 (2018):1091–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Gao G, Koch C, Wu Y. 2019. Building information modelling-based building energy modelling: a review. Appl Energy. 238 (2019):320–343.
   Google Scholar
• Gunarathne AS, Zainudeen N, Perera CR, Perera BS. 2020. A framework of an integrated sustainability and value engineering concepts for construction projects. Int J Constr Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1768624.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Tao Z. 2016. Research on Application of Value Engineering in Optimization Design in the International EPC Project. In: Qi E, Shen J, Dou R, editors. Proceedings of the 22^nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Atlantis Press, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• International Code Council 2012, IECC 2012 edition ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 90.1. [2019 December 25] https://www.iccsafe.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Imam R, Ayadi O. 2020. Powering electric tower cranes by solar energy for sustainable construction. Int J Constr Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1814940.
   Google Scholar
• Jalaei F, Jalaei F, Mohammadi S. 2020. An integrated BIM-LEED application to automate sustainable design assessment framework at the conceptual stage of building projects. Sustain Cities Soc. 53(2020):101979.
   Google Scholar
• Jalaei F, Jrade A. 2015. Integrating building information modeling (BIM) and LEED system at the Conceptual design stage of sustainable buildings. Sustain Cities Soc. 18(2015):95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, Bohdanowicz P. 2009. Sustainable energy utilisation. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Energy Technology, Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kacprzyk Z, Kępa T. 2014. Building information modelling – 4D modelling technology on the example of the reconstruction stairwell. Procedia Eng. 91(2014):226–231.
   Google Scholar
• Kamardeen I. 2010. 8D BIM modelling tool for accident prevention through design. In: Egbu C, editor, Procs 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6–8 September 2010, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 281–289, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lollia N, Fufa M. Inman 2017. A parametric tool for the assessment of operational energy use. Embodied energy and embodied material emissions in building. Energy Procedia. 111(2017):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lotteau M, Loubet P, Sonnemann G. 2017. An analysis to understand how the shape of a concrete residential building influences its embodied energy and embodied carbon. Energy Build. 154(2017):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Won J, Cheng J. 2016. A financial decision making framework for construction projects based on 5D Building Information Modeling (BIM). Int J Project Manage. 34 (1):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar WA, Verbeeck G, Reiter S, Attia S. 2020. Sensitivity analysis of passive design strategies for residential buildings in cold semi-arid climates. Sustainability 12(3):1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh K, Goetghebeour M, Thokala p. Baltussen 2017. Multi-criteria decision analysis to support healthcare decisions. Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Mulyani R, Kholidasari I. W. 2017. The impact of building orientation on energy use: a case study in Bung Hatta University. Int J Real Estate Stud. 11(1):42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Najjar MK, Figueiredo K, Evangelista AJ, Hammad AA, Tam VY, Haddad A. 2019. Life cycle assessment methodology integrated with BIM as a decision-making tool at early-stages of building design. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1637098.
   Google Scholar
• Olawumi TO, Chan DM. 2020. application of generalized Choquet fuzzy integral method in the sustainability rating of green buildings based on the BSAM scheme. Sustain Cities Soc. 61(2020):102147.
   Google Scholar
• Park CS, Kim HJ, Park HT, Goh JH, Pedro A. 2017. BIM-based idea bank for managing value engineering ideas. Int J Project Manage. 35 (4):699–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1990. Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications; p. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2005. Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. PA: RWS.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty T, Vargas L. 2012. Models, methods, concepts & application of the analytic hierarchy process. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiorgio V, Martiradonna S, Fatiguso F, Lombillo I. 2021. Augmented reality based - decision making (AR-DM) to support multi-criteria analysis in constructions. Autom Constr. 124:103567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syngros G, Balaras CA, Koubogiannis DG. 2017. Embodied CO2 emissions in building construction materials of hellenic dwellings. International Conference on Sustainable Synergies from Buildings to the Urban Scale, SBE16.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Green Building Council 2019. LEED v4.1 for building design and construction, getting started guide for beta participants. [2020 January 24] https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-design-and-construction-current-version.
   Google Scholar
• Walasek D, Barszcz A. 2017. Analysis of the adoption rate of Building Information Modeling [BIM] and its Return on Investment [ROI]. Procedia Eng. 172(2017):1227–1234.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf C, Pomponi F, Moncaster A. 2017. Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: a review and critique of current industry practice. Energy Build. 140(2017):68–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yaakob M, Ali WW, Radzuan K. 2016. Identifying critical success factors. (CSFs) of implementing building information modeling (BIM) in Malaysian construction industry. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1761.
   Google Scholar