Design risk modeling and analysis for railway construction projects

References

• Andrić JM, Wang J, Zhong R. 2019. Identifying the critical risks in railway projects based on fuzzy and sensitivity analysis: a case study of Belt and Road Projects. Sustainability. 11(5):1302–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas Y. 1996. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev. 12(3):183–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrão LMP, Carvalho MTM. 2019. Prioritizing construction risks using fuzzy AHP in Brazilian Public Enterprises. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(2):05018018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng P, Chen Z, Ogunlana S, Ikediashi D. 2012. A system dynamics approach to risks description in megaprojects development. OTMCJ. 4(3):593–603.
   Google Scholar
• Elbarkouky MMG, Fayek AR, Siraj NB, Sadeghi N. 2016. Fuzzy arithmetic risk analysis approach to determine construction project contingency. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(12):04016070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemadinia H, Tavakolan M. 2021. Using a hybrid system dynamics and interpretive structural modeling for risk analysis of design phase of the construction projects. Int J Constr Manag. 21(1):93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fateminia SH, Nguyen PH, Fayek AR. 2021. An adaptive hybrid model for determining subjective causal relationships in fuzzy system dynamics models for analyzing construction risks. CivilEng. 2(3):747–764.
   Google Scholar
• Fayek AR. 2020. Fuzzy logic and fuzzy hybrid techniques for construction engineering and management. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(7):04020064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester JW, Senge PM. 1980. Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. TIMS Stud Manage Sci. 14:209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Gashaw T, Jilcha K. 2021. Risk prioritisation using fuzzy analytic network process: a case of Addis–Djibouti railway construction project. J Multi‐Crit Decis Anal. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1776.
   Google Scholar
• Gashaw T, Jilcha K. 2022. Developing a fuzzy synthetic evaluation model for risk assessment: a case of Addis-Djibouti railway construction project. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 7(2):154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharanfoli B, Valmohammadi C. 2019. Identification and prioritization of construction projects investment risks using a hybrid fuzzy approach. J Multi‐Crit Decis Anal. 26(3–4):113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Nepal MP, Skitmore M, Attarzadeh M. 2017. Current research trends and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to the risk assessment of construction projects. Adv Eng Inf. 33(1):112–131.
   Google Scholar
• Leśniak A, Janowiec F. 2019. Risk assessment of additional works in railway construction investments using the Bayes network. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11(19):5388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Liu R, Zhang J, Sun Q. 2014. Quality risk management model for railway construction projects. Procedia Eng. 84:195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Xie Q, Xia B, Bridge AJ. 2017. Impact of design risk on the performance of design-build projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(6):04017010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Davis PR, Ellis JM, Cheung SO. 2010. A systemic view of dispute causation. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 3(4):661–680.
   Google Scholar
• Love PED, Lopez R, Edwards DJ, Goh YM. 2012. Error begat error: design error analysis and prevention in social infrastructure projects. Accid Anal Prev. 48(1):100–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macura D, Laketić M, Pamucar D, Marinković D. 2022. Risk analysis model with interval type-2 fuzzy FMEA – case study of railway infrastructure projects in the Republic of Serbia. Acta Polytech Hung. 19(3):103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu S, Cheng H, Chohr M, Peng W. 2014. Assessing risk management capability of contractors in subway projects in mainland China. Int J Project Manage. 32(3):452–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murat G, Yasemin, N, Mustafa, Ö. Ö 2013. Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey. J Manage Eng. 29(2):133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Afshar A, Khanzadi M. 2008a. System dynamics approach for construction risk analysis. Int J Civil Eng. 6(2):120–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Afshar A, Khanzadi M, Howick S. 2008b. Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modelling for construction risk management. Constr Manage Econ. 26(11):1197–1212.
   Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Carmichael DG, Jarban MJ, Rostamnezhad M. 2019. Hybrid fuzzy-system dynamics approach for quantification of the impacts of construction claims. ECAM. 26(7):1261–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Khanzadi M, Mir M. 2018. A hybrid simulation framework for modelling construction projects using agent-based modelling and system dynamics: an application to model construction workers’ safety behavior. Int J Constr Manage. 18(2):132–143.
   Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Khanzadi M, Rezaie M. 2014. Dynamic modeling of the quantitative risk allocation in construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 32(3):442–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojedehi P, Nasirzadeh F. 2017. A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivity. KSCE J Civ Eng. 21(5):1516–1524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peansupap V, Ly R. 2015. Evaluating the impact level of design errors in structural and other building components in building construction projects in Cambodia. Procedia Eng. 123:370–378.
   Google Scholar
• Pichery C. 2014. Sensitivity analysis. 3rd ed. Oxford: Academic Press. p. 236–237.
   Google Scholar
• Pruyt E. 2013. Small System dynamics models for big issues: triple jump towards real-world complexity. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft Library.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues A, Bowers J. 1996. The role of system dynamics in project management. Int J Project Manage. 14(4):213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Sangsomboon P, Yan S. 2014. Analysis of risk-response based on railroad construction project. Int J Manage Sci Bus Res. 3(12):81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar D, Singh M. 2020. Risk analysis by integrated fuzzy expected value method and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis for an elevated metro rail project of Ahmedabad, India. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1742634.
   Google Scholar
• Seresht NG, Fayek AR. 2018. Dynamic modeling of multifactor construction productivity for equipment-intensive activities. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(9):04018091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj NB, Fayek AR. 2021. Hybrid fuzzy system dynamics model for analyzing the impacts of interrelated risk and opportunity events on project contingency. Can J Civ Eng. 48(8):979–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith NJ, Merna T, Jobling P. 2014. Managing risk in construction projects. 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman JD. 2000. Business dynamic: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tavassolirizi M, Sarvari H, Chan DWM, Olawumi TO. 2020. Factors affecting delays in rail transportation projects using Analytic Network Process: the case of Iran. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1819946.
   Google Scholar
• Ventana Systems. 2007. Vensim, Ventana simulation environment. User’s guide. USA: Ventana Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yuan H. 2017. System dynamics approach for investigating the risk effects on schedule delay in infrastructure projects. J Manage Eng. 33(1):04016029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQ, Osei-Kyei R, Agyeman-Yeboah S. 2020. Modelling the critical risk factors for modular integrated construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1763049.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Chan APC, Yeung JFY. 2010a. Developing a fuzzy risk allocation model for PPP projects in China. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(8):894–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Yeung JFY, Chan APC, Chan DWM, Wang SQ, Ke Y. 2010b. Developing a risk assessment model for PPP projects in China - a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Autom Constr. 19(7):929–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue Y, Xiang P, Jia F, Liu Z. 2020. Risk assessment of high-speed rail projects: a risk coupling model based on system dynamics. IJERPH. 17(15):5307–5326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar I, Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Ahmed S, Yousaf T. 2022. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis of time overrun risk factors in highway projects of terrorism-affected countries: the case of Pakistan. Int J Constr Manage. 22(4):732–750.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Huang N, Han Y, Yin Y, Huang J. 2022. System dynamics analysis of construction safety risk considering existing railway lines. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022:1256975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar