Evaluation of organizational procurement performance for public construction projects: systematic review

References

• Adedokun OA, Ibironke OT, Babatunde SO. 2013. Assessment of competitive tendering methods of procuring educational building projects in Nigeria. J Facilities Manage. 11(1):81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadisheykhsarmast S, Sonmez R. 2020. A smart contract system for security of payment of construction contracts. Automat Constr. 120(August):103401.
   Google Scholar
• Ajmal MM, Khan M, Gunasekaran A, Helo PT. 2021. Managing project scope creep in construction industry. Eng Constr Architect Manage. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Harthi A. 2016. Modelling the relationship between client activities and construction procurement performance in Oman [Doctoral dissertation]. Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• AlNuaimi BK, Khan M. 2019. Public-sector green procurement in the United Arab Emirates: innovation capability and commitment to change. J Clean Prod. 233:482–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsamarraie M, Ghazali F, Hatem ZM, Flaih AY. 2022. A review on the benefits, barriers of the drone employment in the construction site. J Teknol. 84(2):121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsamarraie MM, Ghazali F. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 and control strategies adoption in the construction sector. Ann Roman Soc Cell Biol. 25(6):19524–19531.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sarraf A. 2018. The bid protest system in Iraq: a potential tool for combatting corruption. Lexis Nexis -2018 First Quarter #01. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3191173.
   Google Scholar
• Ang G, Groosman M, Scholten NPM. 2005. Dutch performance-based approach to building regulations and public procurement. Build Res Inf. 33(2):107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai K. 2021. Price and quality: relationship between bid rate and construction performance rating ranking. Int J Qual Reliab Manage. 38(10):2034–2047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ata UZ, Toker A. 2012. The effect of customer relationship management adoption in business‐to‐business markets. J Bus Indus Market. 27(6):497–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S. 2006. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int J Proj Manage. 24(8):687–698.
   Google Scholar
• Baldi S, Bottasso A, Conti M, Piccardo C. 2016. To bid or not to bid: that is the question: public procurement, project complexity and corruption. Eur J Polit Econ. 43:89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez P, Skitmore M, Sanz-Ablanedo E, Verhoeven P. 2019. Forecasting the number and distribution of new bidders for an upcoming construction auction. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(10):04019056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayram S. 2017. Procurement system from past to present in Turkey: a comparison for the construction works. Int J Eng Sci. 6(10):42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Beth E. 2007. Integrity in public procurement: good practice from A to Z. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Bohari AAM, Skitmore M, Xia B, Teo M, Khalil N. 2020. Key stakeholder values in encouraging green orientation of construction procurement. J Clean Prod. 270:122246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau J. 2018. Health and safety key performance indicators. [accessed 2021 Dec 18]. https://www.conformit.com/health-safety-key-performance-indicators/.
   Google Scholar
• Bumgarner KM. 2018. Procurement contract management guidance. In: The World Bank Research Observer. [retrieved 2021 May 06]. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/277011537214902995-0290022018/Procurement-Contract-Management-Guidance.
   Google Scholar
• Burt DN, Pinkerton RL. 1996. A purchasing manager’s guide to strategic proactive procurement. New York (NY): Amacom.
   Google Scholar
• Changalima IA, Mushi GO, Mwaiseje SS. 2021. Procurement planning as a strategic tool for public procurement effectiveness: experience from selected public procuring entities in Dodoma City, Tanzania. JOPP. 21(1):37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Yiu TW. 2006. Are construction disputes inevitable? IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 53(3):456–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chileshe N, Edwards DJ, Kavishe N, Haupt TC. 2020. Perception on challenges impacting bid decision of indigenous building contractors in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. JEDT. 18(6):1641–1662.
   Google Scholar
• Coletta L, Vainieri M, Noto G, Murante AM. 2020. Assessing inter-organizational performance through customer value: a literature review. J Bus Indus Market. 36(13):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada MO. 2011. A second look: stakeholders’ perceptions of some issues in design-bid-build procurement practice in Nigeria. JSD. 5(1):55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dada MO. 2014. The influence of project team relationships on cost growth. J Finan Manage Prop Constr. 19(1):76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Mas F, Dicuonzo G, Massaro M, Dell'Atti V. 2020. Smart contracts to enable sustainable business models. a case study. MD. 58(8):1601–1619.
   Google Scholar
• Deep S, Gajendran T, Jefferies M. 2020. Factors influencing power and dependence for collaboration among construction project participants. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 12(2):06520001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deep S, Gajendran T, Jefferies M. 2021. A systematic review of ‘enablers of collaboration’ among the participants in construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. 21(9):919–931.
   Google Scholar
• Doty DH, Glick WH. 1994. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling. AMR. 19(2):230–251.
   Google Scholar
• Dozzi P, Hartman F, Tidsbury N, Ashrafi R. 1996. More-stable owner-contractor relationships. J Constr Eng Manage. 122(1):30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebekozien A. 2019. Unethical practices in procurement performance of Nigerian public building projects: mixed methods approach. Theoret Empirical Res Urban Manage. 14(3):41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Edler J, Georghiou L. 2007. Public procurement and innovation-resurrecting the demand side. Res Policy. 36(7):949–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eke G, Elgy J, Wedawatta G. 2019. Establishing a link between contractor selection strategy and project outcomes: simulation study. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(10):04019062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdis E. 2013. The effect of current public procurement law on duration and cost of construction projects in Turkey. J Civil Eng Manage. 19(1):121–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson PE, Westerberg M. 2011. Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework. Int J Proj Manage. 29(2):197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ershadi M, Jefferies M, Davis P, Mojtahedi M. 2021a. Barriers to achieving sustainable construction project procurement in the private sector. Clean Eng Technol. 3(May):100125.
   Google Scholar
• Ershadi M, Jefferies M, Davis P, Mojtahedi M. 2021b. Project management offices in the construction industry: a literature review and qualitative synthesis of success variables. Constr Manage Econ. 39(6):493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzaij KR. 2020. Nature and causes of claims in Iraqi turnkey projects. IOP Conf Ser:Mater Sci Eng. 745(1):012181.
   Google Scholar
• Francis PL. 2007. Defense acquisitions. Future combat system risks underscore the importance of oversight. Washington (DC): Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Georgieva I. 2017. The public procurement system in Bulgaria: authorities, participants, control and achievements. In: Using transparency against corruption in public procurement, studies in European economic law and regulation, vol 11. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51304-1_4.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadamsi A, Braimah N. 2016. The impact of design-bid-build procurement methods on project performance in Libya. J Constr Eng Proj Manage. 6(2):16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadge A, Kidd E, Bhattacharjee A, Tiwari MK. 2019. Sustainable procurement performance of large enterprises across supply chain tiers and geographic regions. Int J Prod Res. 57(3):764–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Hossein Azadnia A, Heavey C, Dolgui A, Can B. 2016. A review on the buyer–supplier dyad relationships in sustainable procurement context: past, present and future. Int J Prod Res. 54(5):1443–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Methods. 16(1):15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel A. 2016. Understanding pre-qualification preferences of public clients in traditional and design-build procurement systems. IJPM. 9(6):684–700.
   Google Scholar
• Gransberg DD, Ellicott MA. 1997. Best-value contracting criteria. Cost Eng. 39(6):31.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B. 2021. Influence of best value procurement on design-build projects: a grounded theory study. Int J Constr Educ Res. DOI: 10.1080/15578771.2021.1910387.
   Google Scholar
• Hatem Z, Alsamarraie M, Flaih A. 2021. Barriers to the adoption of industrialized building system in Iraqi construction industry. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci. 33(3):30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ho L, Kuo T, Lin B. 2012. How social identification and trust influence organizational online knowledge sharing. Internet Res. 22(1):4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högnason GO, Wondimu P, Laedre O. 2019. Best value procurement (BVP) in Norwegian construction projects. Period Polytech Arch. 50(1):12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ibem EO, Laryea S. 2014. Survey of digital technologies in procurement of construction projects. Automat Constr. 46:11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2017. ISO 20400. Geneva (Switzerland): International organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafar M, Radzi NM. 2013. Level of satisfaction and issues with procurement systems used in the Malaysian public sector. CEB. 13(1):50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafar M, Nuruddin AR. 2012. The development of public and private construction procurement systems in the Malaysian construction industry. J Design Built Environ. 11(1).
   Google Scholar
• Jacob EK. 2004. Classification and categorization: a difference that makes a difference. Libr Trends 52(3):Winter 2004:515–540.
   Google Scholar
• Jagannathan M, Delhi VSK. 2020. Perceptions of stakeholders on the ‘redraftability’ of construction contracts. IIM Kozhikode Soc Manage Rev. 9(2):152–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MWA, Ting NH, Kuang LC, Darun MR, Mehfooz U, Khamidi MF. 2018. Green procurement in construction industry: a theoretical perspective of enablers and barriers. MATEC Web Conf. 203:02012.
   Google Scholar
• Knebel S, Seele P. 2021. Introducing public procurement tenders as part of corporate communications: a typological analysis based on CSR reporting indicators. Corp Commun Int J. 26(3):484–500.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad S, Gall M. 2008. Requirements engineering in the development of large-scale systems. In 2008 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 217–22. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak YH, Smith BM. 2009. Managing risks in mega defense acquisition projects: performance, policy, and opportunities. Int J Proj Manage. 27(8):812–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam EW, Chan AP, Chan DW. 2008. Determinants of successful design-build projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(5):333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau CH, Mesthrige JW, Lam PTI, Javed AA. 2019. The challenges of adopting new engineering contract: a Hong Kong study. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 26(10):2389–2409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. 2015. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol. 16(6):1188–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ZP, Rahman RA, Doh SI. 2020. Key drivers for adopting design build: a comparative study between project stakeholders. Phys Chem Earth. Parts A/B/C. 120:102945.
   Google Scholar
• Leksono EB, Suparno S, Vanany I. 2019. Integration of a balanced scorecard, DEMATEL, and ANP for measuring the performance of a sustainable healthcare supply chain. Sustainability. 11(13):3626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenderink B, Halman JIM, Boes H, Voordijk H. 2020. A method to encourage and assess innovations in public tenders for infrastructure and construction projects. CI. 20(2):171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Lenderink B, Halman JIM, Voordijk H. 2019. Innovation and public procurement: from fragmentation to synthesis on concepts, rationales and approaches. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2019.1700101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesniak A, Plebankiewicz E, Zima K. 2012. Design and build procurement system – contractor selection. Archiv Civil Eng. 58(4):463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Levin G. 2014. Key competencies for success in navigating complexity. Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lindskog H, Brege S, Brehmer P-O. 2010. Corruption in public procurement and private sector purchasing. J Organ Transf Soc Change. 7(2):167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ling FYY. 2004. Key determinants of performance of design-bid-build projects in Singapore. Build Res Inf. 32(2):128–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Tran HBT. 2012. Ingredients to engender trust in construction project teams in Vietnam. Constr Innov. 12(1):43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore M. 2016. Social procurement in UK construction projects. Int J Proj Manage. 34(2):133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Smith J, Ackermann F, Irani Z. 2019. Making sense of rework and its unintended consequence in projects: the emergence of uncomfortable knowledge. Int J of Proj Manage. 37(3):501–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H. 2011. Factors affecting the bid/no bid decision making process of small to medium size contractors in Auckland. (Unpublished document submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Construction). Unitec Institute of Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/10652/1785.
   Google Scholar
• Mabillard V, Zumofen R. 2021. Transparency and accountability – the case of public procurement practices in Switzerland. Public Works Manage Policy. 26(2):95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manu P, Mahamadu A-M, Booth C, Olaniyi Olomolaiye P, Coker A, Ibrahim A, Lamond J. 2019. Infrastructure procurement capacity gaps in Nigeria public sector institutions. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 26(9):1962–1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinelli M, Antoniou F. 2020. Improving public works’ value for money: a new procurement strategy. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 13(1):85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens CDP, Machado FJ, Martens ML, Silva FQPdOe, Freitas HMRd. 2018. Linking entrepreneurial orientation to project success. Int J Proj Manage. 36(2):255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbachu J, Nkado R. 2006. Conceptual framework for assessment of client needs and satisfaction in the building development process. Constr Manage Econ. 24(1):31–44.
   Google Scholar
• McMurray AJ, Islam MM, Siwar C, Fien J. 2014. Sustainable procurement in Malaysian organizations: practices, barriers and opportunities. J Purchas Supply Manage. 20(3):195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosevic DZ, Patanakul P, Srivannaboon S. 2011. Case studies in project, program, and organizational project management. Wiley. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=nsUPKRpDGZAC.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar KR, Songer AD. 1998. Model for public sector design-build project selection. J Constr Eng Manage. 124(6):467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlino E. 2016. International public procurement.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh SR, Brooks T. 2019. Critical success factors for social value in construction procurement in Northern Ireland. Proc Inst Civil Eng Manage Procure Law. 172(5):183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Nalini B, Durai FAP. 2019. Emerging trends of HR practices in green initiatives. Int J Res Eng IT Soc Sci. 9(03):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Naoum S, Egbu C. 2015. Critical review of procurement method research in construction journals. Proc Econ Finance. 21(5):6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen AT, Nguyen LD, Le-Hoai L, Dang CN. 2015. Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Proj Manage. 33(6):1364–1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols PM. 2017. What is organizational corruption? In: Aßländer MS, Hudson S, editors. The handbook of business and corruption. Emerald Publishing Limited; p. 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Noor MA, Khalfan MMA, Maqsood T. 2013. The role of procurement practices in effective implementation of infrastructure projects in Pakistan. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 6(4):802–826.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. Improving transparency within government procurement procedures in Iraq. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/44736006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE. 2018. Bonding capability of Nigerian contracting firms. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 25(6):707–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyegoke AS, McDermott P, Abbott C. 2009. Achieving sustainability in construction through the specialist task organisation procurement approach. IJPM. 2(3):288–313.
   Google Scholar
• Papajohn D, El Asmar M, Molenaar KR. 2019. Contract administration tools for design-build and construction manager/general contractor highway projects. J Manage Eng. 35(6):04019028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry L. 1988. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail. 64(1):12–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashev KV. 2011. Corruption and accession: evidence from public procurement in Bulgaria. Public Manage Rev. 13(3):409–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patanakul P. 2014. Managing large-scale IS/IT projects in the public sector: problems and causes leading to poor performance. J High Technol Manage Res. 25(1):21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Patanakul P, Hoon Kwak Y, Zwikael O, Liu M. 2016. What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects? Int J Proj Manage. 34(3):452–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson PG, Spreng RA. 1997. Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business‐to‐business, services context: an empirical examination. Int J Serv Indus Manage. 8(5):414–434.
   Google Scholar
• Rasheli GA. 2016. Procurement contract management in the local government authorities (LGAs) in Tanzania: a transaction cost approach. IJPSM. 29(6):545–564.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson CM. 2018. Pro-poor local economic development in South Africa: the application of public procurement. In: Local economic development in the developing world. Routledge; p. 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Ruparathna R, Hewage K. 2015. Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: current practices, drivers and opportunities. J Clean Prod. 109:305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabino LR, Reis Neto MT, Morais GM, Santos VFd. 2021. Leadership, communication, and resistance influence organizational performance. Latin Am Bus Rev. 22(3):265–222.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. United Kingdom: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sayyed Y, Hatamleh MT, Alaya A. 2021. Investigating the influence of procurement management in construction projects on the innovation level and the overall project performance in developing countries. Int J Constr Manage. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1889088.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk J, Torenvlied R, Allen J. 2010. Network embeddedness and public agency performance: the strength of strong ties in Dutch higher education. J Public Adm Res Theory. 20(3):629–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo W, Kang Y. 2020. Performance indicators for the claim management of general contractors. J Manage Eng. 36(6):04020070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwarka MS. 2019. Impact of the Nigerian procurement reform on planning practices of construction practitioners. FUTY J Environ. 13(2):14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Soong KK, Ahmed EM, Tan KS. 2020. Factors influencing Malaysian small and medium enterprises adoption of electronic government procurement. JOPP. 20(1):38–61.
   Google Scholar
• Stanitsas M, Kirytopoulos K. 2021. Investigating the significance of sustainability indicators for promoting sustainable construction project management. Int J Constr Manage. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1887718.
   Google Scholar
• Stovold E, Beecher D, Foxlee R, Noel-Storr A. 2014. Study flow diagrams in cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram. Syst Rev. 3(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang LY, Shen Q, Cheng EWL. 2010. A review of studies on public-private partnership projects in the construction industry. Int J Proj Manage. 28(7):683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang ZW, Ng ST, Skitmore M. 2019. Influence of procurement systems to the success of sustainable buildings. J Clean Prod. 218:1007–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taofeeq MD, Adeleke AQ, Lee C-K. 2020. Government policy as a key moderator to contractors’ risk attitudes among Malaysian construction companies. JEDT. 18(6):1543–1569.
   Google Scholar
• Toor S-U-R, Ogunlana S. 2008. Problems causing delays in major construction projects in Thailand. Constr Man Econ. 26(4):395–408.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO Office for Iraq. 2019. Assessment of the labour market & skills analysis Iraq and Kurdistan Region-Iraq. [retrieved 2021 May 07]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371374.
   Google Scholar
• Walker H, Brammer S. 2009. Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Manage Int J. 14(2):128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker H, Miemczyk J, Johnsen T, Spencer R. 2012. Sustainable procurement: past, present and future. J Purchas Supply Manage. 18(4):201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Walt JD, Botha PS, Scheepbouwer E. 2019. When to engage the contractor for pre-construction services in New Zealand. Transp Res Rec. 2673(2):562–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Li X. 2014. Centralizing public procurement in China: task environment and organizational structure. Public Manage Rev. 16(6):900–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang KW, Yu WD. 2014. A graphical model for analysis of heterogeneous procurement. J Technol. 29:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu J, Zuo J, Rameezdeen R. 2019. Ways to improve the project management efficiency in a centralized public procurement system: a structural equation modeling approach. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 27(1):168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch GM, Cha J. 2020. Owner challenges on major projects: the case of UK government. Int J Proj Manage. 38(3):177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondimu PA, Klakegg OJ, Laedre O. 2020. Early contractor involvement (ECI): ways to do it in public projects. JOPP. 20(1):62–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wong JKW, Chan JKS, Wadu MJ. 2016. Facilitating effective green procurement in construction projects: an empirical study of the enablers. J Clean Prod. 135:859–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2021. References T. (2021, April 05). Overview; [retrieved 2021 May 06]. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iraq/overview.
   Google Scholar
• Yap JBH, Lee KY, Skitmore M. 2020. Analysing the causes of corruption in the Malaysian construction industry. JEDT. 18(6):1823–1847.
   Google Scholar
• Yu WD, Chang HK, Hsu YY, Cheng ST, Wang KW. 2020. Pretendering decision model for contractor selection of public procurement projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(11):04020126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Mostafavi A. 2017. Discovering complexity and emergent properties in project systems: a new approach to understanding project performance. Int J Proj Manage. 35(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zin Zawawi MI, Kulatunga U, Thayaparan M. 2016. Malaysian experience with public-private partnership (PPP): managing unsolicited proposal. BEPAM. 6(5):508–520.
   Google Scholar