A category and index hybrid (CIH) approach to measuring the level of prefabrication

References

• Abosaod H, Underwood J, Isikdag U, Barony S. 2010. A classification system for representation of offsite manufacturing concepts through virtual prototyping. In 9th International Detail Design in Architecture Conference (267–278).
   Google Scholar
• Ahn S, Crouch L, Kim TW, Rameezdeen R. 2020. Comparison of worker safety risks between on-site and offsite construction methods: a site management perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(9):05020010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alinaitwe HM, Mwakali J, Hansson B. 2006. Assessing the degree of industrialisation in construction–a case of Uganda. J Civil Eng Manage. 12(3):221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan MH, Korkmaz HH, Gulay FG. 2006. Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the Turkish Earthquake code. Eng Fail Anal. 13(4):537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCA 2015. Code of practice on buildability e 2015 edition. Available at: https://www.bca.gov.sg/BuildableDesign/others/copbdnov2015.pdf. (Accessed: 12 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Blismas N, Pasquire C, Gibb A. 2006. Benefit evaluation for offsite production in construction. Constr Manage Econ. 24(2):121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Burridge J. 2021. Hybrid concrete construction: the best of both worlds. https://thisisukconcrete.co.uk/Perspectives/Hybrid-concrete-construction-the-best-of-both-worl.aspx. (Accessed: 21 April 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Chang T. 2018. China to promote prefabricated construction. Available at: https://www.turnerandtownsend.com/en/perspectives/china-to-promote-prefabricated-construction-international-construction-market-survey-2018. (Accessed: 05 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Choi JO, Chen XB, Kim TW. 2019. Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. Int J Constr Manage. 19(2):93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). 2004. Introduction to the IBS Content Scoring System (IBS Score). http://dspace.unimap.edu.my/dspace/bitstream/123456789/15567/1/IBS-CIDB.pdf. http://dspace.unimap.edu.my/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/15567/IBS-CIDB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. (Accessed: 12 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Dong YH, Jaillon L, Chu P, Poon CS. 2015. Comparing carbon emissions of precast and cast-in-situ construction methods–a case study of high-rise private building. Constr Build Mater. 99:39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb A. 2001. Pre-assembly in construction: a review of recent and current industry and research initiatives on pre-assembly in construction. Construction Research & Innovation Strategy Panel, London.
   Google Scholar
• Glass J. 2005. A best practice process model for hybrid concrete construction. Constr Manage Econ. 23(2):169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Goodier C, Gibb A. 2007. Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Constr Manage Econ. 25(6):585–595.
   Google Scholar
• Gorgolewski M. 2004. Prefabrication and sustainability in UK housing. Atlanta, Georgia: ASHRAE Buildings IX.
   Google Scholar
• Hao J, Chen Z, Zhang Z, Loehlein G. 2021. Quantifying construction waste reduction through the application of prefabrication: a case study in Anhui, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(19):24499–24510.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Census & Statistics Department. 2007. The survey on waiting list applicants for public rental housing: Census and Statistics Department Hong Kong. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/EIndexbySubject.html?scode=100&pcode=FA100102.
   Google Scholar
• Hong J, Shen GQ, Mao C, Li Z, Li K. 2016. Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model. J Cleaner Prod. 112:2198–2207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaillon L, Poon CS. 2008. Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study. Constr Manage Econ. 26(9):953–966.
   Google Scholar
• Jaillon L, Poon CS. 2010. Design issues of using prefabrication in Hong Kong building construction. Constr Manage Econ. 28(10):1025–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Jaillon L, Poon CS, Chan YY, Lee MW, Cai X. 2020. Green building rating systems and construction waste in high-density urban environment: the case study of Hong Kong. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol. 11(4):60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Moreno P. 2017. Evolution of Japanese and British Prefabricated Housing Industry. Available at: https://medium.com/zero-energy-mass-custom-houses/evolution-of-japanese-and-british-housing-industry-d1e57a22e00b. (Accessed: 15 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson W. 2007. [Lessons from Japan: a comparative study of the market drivers for prefabrication in Japanese and UK private housing development]. [Doctoral dissertation]. University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Lau SY, Chen T, Zhang J, Xue X, Lau SK, Khoo YS. 2019. A new approach for the project process: prefabricated building technology integrated with photovoltaics based on the BIM system. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 294(1):012050.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Shen GQ, Alshawi M. 2014. Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: an empirical study in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 91:27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Ma Z, Zhao K, Hu W, Wei J. 2018. The impact of population migration on urban housing prices: evidence from China’s major cities. Sustainability. 10(9):3169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chen R. 2022. Analysis of the economic benefits of prefabricated buildings. Int J Manage Educ Human Dev. 2(01):208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Lu W, Chen K, Xue F, Pan W. 2018. Searching for an optimal level of prefabrication in construction: an analytical framework. J Cleaner Prod. 201:236–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Lee WM, Xue F, Xu J. 2021. Revisiting the effects of prefabrication on construction waste minimisation: a quantitative study using bigger data. Resour Conserv Recycl. 170:105579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Webster C, Peng Y, Chen X, Zhang X. 2017. Estimating and calibrating the amount of building-related construction and demolition waste in urban China. Int J Constr Manage. 17(1):13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lu WS, Yuan HP. 2013. Investigating waste reduction potential in the upstream processes of offshore prefabrication construction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 28:804–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgregor W. 2017. Sweden’s advanced prefabricated construction industry. Available at: https://sourceable.net/swedens-advanced-prefabricated-constructionindustry/#:∼:text=Sweden%20is%20the%20leading%20exponent,Sweden%20dates%20back%2050%20ears. (Accessed: 14 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa S, Kim KP, Tam VW, Rahnamayiezekavat P. 2020. Exploring the status, benefits, barriers, and opportunities of using BIM for advancing prefabrication practice. Int J Constr Manage. 20(2):146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Newton C, Backhouse S, Aibinu AA, Cleveland B, Crawford RH, Holzer D, Soccio P, Kvan T. 2018. Plug n play: future prefab for smart green schools. Buildings. 8(7):88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MM. 2014. Barriers of implementing modern methods of construction. J Manage Eng. 30(1):69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner B. 2009. The correlation coefficient: its values range between +1/−1, or do they? J Target Meas Anal Mark. 17(2):139–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rotimi FE, Almughrabi FM, Samarasinghe DAS, Silva C. 2022. Specific skill requirements within prefabricated residential construction: stakeholders’ perspectives. Buildings. 12(1):43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsuzzoha A, Piya S, Al-Kindi M, Al-Hinai N. 2018. Metrics of product modularity: lessons learned from case companies. JM2. 13(2):331–350.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra L, Zamora J. 2013. Balconies, analysis of constructive technology current state and foresight of new industrial development. In Cruz, P.J.S. (Ed.). Structures and architecture: concepts, applications and challenges. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 636–643. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15267-89.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhardt DA, Manley K, Miller W. 2014. Predicting Australian builders’ intentions to use prefabrication. Available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/81179/. (Accessed: 12 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Tam VW, Hao JJ. 2014. Prefabrication as a mean of minimising construction waste on-site. Int J Constr Manage. 14(2):113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VW, Tam CM, Chan JK, Ng WC. 2006. Cutting construction wastes by prefabrication. Int J Constr Manage. 6(1):15–25.
   Google Scholar
• The Edge Property. 2016. Mandatory to achieve IBS score of 70 in construction industry, Says Najib. Available at: https://www.edgeprop.my/content/mandatoryachieve-ibs-score-70-construction-industry-says-najib., (Accessed: 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Wong JM, Chan AP, Chiang YH. 2008. Modelling and forecasting construction labour demand: multivariate analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(9):664–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JL, Liu X, Zhao JB, Yuan Y, Mang H. 2021. Application of a combined precast and in-situ-cast construction method for large-span underground vaults. Tunnell Underground Space Technol. 111:103795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Lee MW, Jaillon L, Poon CS. 2018. The hindrance to using prefabrication in Hong Kong’s building industry. J Cleaner Prod. 204:70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar