Risks assessment in the construction of infrastructure projects using artificial neural networks

References

• Abusafiya HA, Suliman SM. 2017. Causes and effects of cost overrun on construction project in Bahrain: part I (ranking of cost overrun factors and risk mapping). MAS. 11(7):20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Adekele AQ, Bahaudin AY, Kamarudeen AM, Bamgbade JA, Khan MWA, Panda S, Afolabi YA. 2019. An empirical analysis of organizational external factors on construction risk management. Int J Supply Chain Manage. 8(1):932–940.
   Google Scholar
• Afzal F, Yunfei S, Sajid M, Afzal F. 2020. Integrated priority decision index for risk assessment in chaos: cost overruns in transport projects. ECAM. 27(4):825–849.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Hashimi AMGA, Masuri MM. 2022. The impact of risk management and project management skills on the performance of construction projects in United Arab Emirates. Acad Strat Manag J. 21(4).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zwainy FMS, Aidan IA, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq. 2017. Forecasting the cost of structure of infrastructure projects utilizing artificial neural network model (highway projects as case study). Indian J Sci Technol. 10(20):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• ALI Z, Zhu F, Hussain S. 2018. Risk assessment of ex-post transaction cost in construction projects using structural equation modeling. Sustain. 10(11):4017–4037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvand A, Mirhosseini SM, Ehsanifar M, Zeighami E, Mohammadi A. 2021. Identification and assessment of risk in construction projects using the integrated FMEA-SWARA-WASPAS model under fuzzy environment: a case study of a construction project in Iran. Int J Constr Manag. 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1877875.
   Google Scholar
• Bokor O, Perez LF, Pesce G, Seresht NG. 2021. Using artificial neural model to model bricklaying productivity. European Conference on Computing in Construction. July 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Sharma K, Singh S. 2020. Identifying and analyzing key factors associated with risks in construction projects. In Babu KG, Rao HS, Amarnath Y, editors. Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore; p. 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Dounavi L-E, Dermitzakis E, Chatzistelios G, Kirytopoulos K. 2022. Project management for corporate events: a set of tools to manage risk and increase quality outcomes. Sustainability. 14(4):2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doroshenko A. 2020. Applying artificial neural networks in construction. ARFEE. Web of Conferences 143, 10
   Google Scholar
• El-Sawalhi NI, Shehatto O. 2014. A neural network model for building construction projects cost estimating. KICEM J Const Eng Proj Manag. 4(4):9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Genc O. 2021. Identifying principal risk factors in Turkish construction sector according to their probability of occurrences: a relative importance index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) approach. Int J Constr Manag. 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1946901.
   Google Scholar
• Girardi LR, Junior RR, Moutinho JD. 2017. Characterization of risk factor management in infrastructure projects. Gest Prod. 25(1):30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gouda Mohamed A, Helmy Ammar M, Nabawy M. 2022. Risks assessment using structural equation modeling: mega housing projects construction in Egypt. Int J Constr Manag. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2092387.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Thakkar JJ. 2018. A quantitative risk assessment methodology for construction project. Sadhana. 43(7):116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isah MA, Kim B. 2022. Assessment of risk impact on road project using deep neural network. KSCE J Civ Eng. 26(3):1014–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Nepal MP, Skitmore M. 2019. Modified fuzzy group decision-making approach to cost overrun risk assessment of power plant projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 145:4018126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani A, Saffariha M. 2021. Modeling of trees failure under windstorm in harvested Hyrcanian forests using machine learning techniques. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung W, Han SH. 2017. Which risk management is most crucial for controlling project cost? J. Manag. Eng. 33:4017029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew KT, Low WW, Wong KS, Wong SY. 2019. Review: risk assessment of infrastructure projects on project cost. IOP Conf Ser: mater Sci Eng. 495(2019):12088.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal A, Abas M, Khan D, Azfar RW. 2019. Risk factors influencing the building projects in Pakistan: from perspective of contractors, clients and consultants. Int J Constr Manag. 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1683693.
   Google Scholar
• Karadimos P, Anthopoulos L. 2021. Neural network models for actual cost and actual duration estimation in construction projects: findings from Greece. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Struc Const Eng. 15(5):250–261.
   Google Scholar
• Korytárová J, Hromádka V. 2021. Risk assessment of large-scale infrastructure projects—assumptions and context. Appl Sci. 11:109.
   Google Scholar
• Liew KT, Low WW, Wong KS, Wong SY. 2019. Review: risk assessment of infrastructure projects on project cost. IOP Conf Ser: mater Sci Eng. 495(2019):12088.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Chang R, Zuo J, Webber RJ, Xiong F, Dong N. 2021. Application of artificial neural networks in construction management: current status and future directions. Appl Sci (Switzerland). 11(20):9616.
   Google Scholar
• Matel E, Vahdatikhaki F, Hosseinyalamdary S, Evers T, Voordijk H. 2022. An artificial neural network approach for cost estimation of engineering services. Int J Const Manag. 22(7):1274–1287.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed AG, Marzouk M. 2021. Building condition assessment using artificial neural network and structural equations. Expert Syst Appl. 186:115743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabawy M, Khodeir LM. 2021. Achieving efficiency in quantitative risk analysis process – application on infrastructure projects. Ain Shams Eng J Sci Direct. 12(2):2303–2311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan L. Available from: Malaysia pushes infrastructure projects 2018. https://themalaysianreserve.com/2018/01/30/malaysia-pushes-infrastructure-projects/.
   Google Scholar
• Olden JD, Joy MK, Death RG. 2004. An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Modell. 178(3–4):389–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell M-E, Kuypers M, Smith M, Keller P. 2018. Cyber risk management for critical infrastructure: a risk analysis model and three case studies. Risk Anal. 38(2):226–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil Vasant B. 2015. Managing risk in infrastructure projects. IJARIIE. 2(4):2395–4396.
   Google Scholar
• Pessoa A, Sousa G, Maués L, Alvarenga F, Santos D. 2021. Cost forecasting of public construction projects using multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks: a case study. Ing Inv. 41(3):e87737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. 2018. A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. 2017. A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide). Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rihar L. 2019. Standard risk management model for infrastructure projects. In N. Khatleli, editor, Risk Management in Construction Projects. London: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Roweis S. 1996. Levenberg-marquardt optimization. Lecture Notes, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. https://cs.nyu.edu/∼roweis/notes/lm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saffariha M, Jahani A, Jahani R, Latif S. 2021. Prediction of hypericin content in Hypericum perforatum L. in different ecological habitat using artificial neural networks. Plant Methods. 17(1):10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj NB, Fayek AR. 2019. Risk identification and common risks in construction: literature review and content analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(9):3119004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taofeed DM, Adekele AQ, Hassan AK. 2019. Factors affecting contractor’s risk attitude from Malaysia construction industry perspective. Soc Sci Hum J. 3(6):1281–1298.
   Google Scholar
• Tepeli E, Taillandier F, Breysse D. 2019. Multidimensional modelling of complex and strategic construction projects for a more effective risk management. Int J Constr Manag. 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1606493.
   Google Scholar
• Tran DQ, Molenaar KR, Alarcön LF. 2016. A hybrid cross-impact approach to predicting cost variance of project delivery decisions for highways. J Infrastruct Syst. 22(1):4015017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tserng H-P, Cho I-C, Chen C-H, Liu Y-F. 2021. Developing a risk management process for infrastructure projects using IDEF0. Sustainability. 13(12):6958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won JW, Jung W, Han SH, Yun S, Koo B. 2019. What enables a high-risk project to yield high return from a construction contractor’s perspective? Sustainability. 11(21):5971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Chen L. 2008. A novel approach for determining the optimal number of hidden layer neurons for FNN's and its application in data mining. In 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications. ICITA2008 ISBN: 978-0-9803267-2-7 (pp. 683–686). https://eprints.utas.edu.au/6995/1/02-au-xu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Chan AP, Chen C, Darko A. 2018. Critical risk factors of transnational public-private partnership projects: literature review. J Infrastruct Syst. 24(1):4017042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki A, Elalim AMA, El Samadony A. 2018. Factors affecting schedule delay and cost overrun in Egyptian construction projects. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Sustainable Construction and Project Management-Sustainable Infrastructure and Transportation for Future Cities; Aswan, Egypt. p. 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wang B, Mbachu J, Liu Z. 2019. New Zealand building project cost and its influential factors: a structural equation modelling approach. Adv Civ Eng. 2019:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar