International Green building systems and Egyptian Green Pyramid system: a comparative study

References

• Ali HH, Al Nsairat SF. 2009. Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries case of Jordan. Build Environ. 44(5):1053–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyami SH, Rezgui Y. 2012. Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 5:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade J, Bragança L. 2016. Sustainability assessment of dwellings – a comparison of methodologies. Civ Eng Environ Syst. 33(2):125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi U. 2015. Sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities. In: Klemes JJ, editor. Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; p. 497–545.
   Google Scholar
• Building Construction Authority. 2013. BCA green mark for new non-residential buildings version NRB/4.1. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Chan EHW, Qian QK, Lam PTI. 2009. The market for green building in developed Asian cities – the perspectives of building designers. Energy Policy. 37(8):3061–3070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lee WL. 2013. Energy assessment of office buildings in China using LEED 2.2 and BEAM Plus 1.1. Energy Build. 63:129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chethana IM, Illankoon S, Tam VWY, Le KN, Shen L. 2017. Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools. J Clean Prod. 164:209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole RJ. 2005. Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles. Build Res Inf. 33(5):455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley D, Aho I. 1999. Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends. Build Res Inf. 27(4–5):300–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoud AO, Othman AAE, Robinson H, Bayyati A. 2018. Towards a green materials procurement: investigating the Egyptian green pyramid rating system. In: Archit Eng Des Manag. Cairo, Egypt: Elain Publishing House. p. 575–591. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323588948.
   Google Scholar
• Daoud AO, Othman AAE, Robinson H, Bayyati A. 2020. An investigation into solid waste problem in the Egyptian construction industry: a mini-review. Waste Manag Res. 38(4):371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delai I, Takahashi S. 2011. Sustainability measurement system: a reference model proposal. Soc Responsib J. 7(3):438–471.
   Google Scholar
• Emmanuel M, Julius A. 2021. Secondary research methods in the built environment book. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, UK: Routledge; p. 296.
   Google Scholar
• Godslove A, Kofi A, Emmanuel A, Daniel D. 2019. A framework for the implementation of green certification of buildings in Ghana. Int J Constr Manag. 21(6):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes V, Silva M, Lamberts R, Takaoka MV, Ilha M. 2008. Sustainable building in Brazil. Proceedings of the World Sustainable Building Conference; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gowri K. 2004. Green building rating systems: an overview. Ashrae J. 46(11):56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Building Council of Australia. 2015. Green Star Project Directory. http://www.gbca.org.au/project-directory.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Haapio A, Viitaniemi P. 2008. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(7):469–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed F, Hamidreza A, Saeed B, Mehdi R. 2022. BIM applications in sustainable construction: scientometric and state-of-the-art review. Int J Constr Manag. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2029679.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid ZA, Zain MZM, Hung FC, Noor MSM, Roslan AF, Kilau NM, Ali MC. 2014. Towards a national green building rating system for Malaysia. 14(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Henn R. 2008. Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organ Environ. 21(4):390–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [HBRC] Housing and Building National Research Center. 2018. The green pyramid rating system. Ministry of Housing, Utilities & Urban Communities, Cairo, Egypt, Second version (Issue 2).
   Google Scholar
• Kamaruzzaman SN, Lou ECW, Zainon N, Mohamed Zaid NS, Wong PF. 2016. Environmental assessment schemes for non-domestic building refurbishment in the Malaysian context. Ecol Indic. 69:548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalifa SS, Abdelkader M, Eissa AM, Hamdy AM. 2018. Obstacles of application of green pyramid rating system (GPRS) on local projects in Egypt. The 4th NZAAR International Event Series on Natural and Built Environment, Cities, Sustainability and Advanced Engineering. p. 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Lee WL, Burnett J. 2008. Benchmarking energy use assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and LEED. Build Environ. 43(11):1882–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Ding GKC, Samali B. 2013. Building Sustainable Score (BSS) – a hybrid process approach for sustainable building assessment in China. JPEE. 01(05):58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Prasad D, Li J, Fu Y, Liu J. 2006. Developing regionally specific environmental building tools for China. Build Res Inf. 34(4):372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lützkendorf T, Lorenz D. 2006. Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Build Res Inf. 34(4):334–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papajohn D, Brinker C, El Asmar M. 2016. Uncovering key criteria to assess sustainability rating systems for the built environment. Paper presented at: Construction Research Congress; San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Pink B. 2012. Year Book 2012. Australian bureau of statistics, Canberra. NUMBER 92 ABS Catalogue No. 1301.0.
   Google Scholar
• Pushkar S, Shaviv E. 2016. Using shearing layer concept to evaluate green rating systems. Archit Sci Rev. 59(2):114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raouf AM, Al-Ghamdi SG. 2020. Framework to evaluate quality performance of green building delivery: construction and operational stage. Int J Constr Manag. 23(2):253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Reed R, Wilkinson S, Bilos A, Schulte K-W. 2011. A comparison of international sustainable building tools – an update. Paper presented at: The 17th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference; Gold Coast.
   Google Scholar
• Sachin VG, Jha KN. 2012. Comparative study of rating systems for green building in developing and developed countries. Paper presented at: advancing Civil, Architectural and Construction Engineering & Management. The Third International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDCeIII); Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Sallam I, Abdelaal MRM. 2016. Relative weight of water efficiency credits: as an indicator to enhance buildings’ environmental assessment tools performance. Archit Sci Rev. 59(5):423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-Jose J, Losada R, Cuadrado J, Garrucho I. 2007. Approach to the quantification of the sustainable value in industrial buildings. Build Environ. 42(11):3916–3923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz Y, Raslan R. 2013. Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: a case study. Energy Build. 62:350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseldin AK. 2019. Including the building environmental efficiency in the environmental building rating systems. Ain Shams Eng J. 9(4):455–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpeh EK, Smallwood JJ, Ahadzie DK, Henry M. 2023. Analytical taxonomy of challenges to the implementation of green building projects in South Africa. Int J Constr Manag. 23(2):286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Sinou M, Kyvelou S. 2006. Present and future of building performance assessment tools. Manag Environ Qual Int J. 17(5):570–586.
   Google Scholar
• Tam C, Tam VW, Tsui W. 2004. Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong. Int J Proj Manag. 22(7):563–571.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Shen L, Yao H. 2011. Sustainable construction practice and contractors competitiveness: a preliminary study. Habitat Int. 35(2):225–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Green Building Council. 2014. LEED V4 for building design and construction. Washington, DC: US Green Building Council. http://greenguard.org/uploads/images/LEEDv4forBuildingDesignandConstructionBallotVersion.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas GS, Jha KN. 2016. Identification of green building attributes for the development of an assessment tool: a case study in India. Civ Eng Environ Syst. 33(4):313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei B, Zhang B, Luo W. 2010. Research on assessment method of green buildings in China. Paper presented at: ASME 2010. 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Ye L, Cheng Z, Wang Q, Lin H, Lin C, Liu B. 2015. Developments of green building standards in China. Renew Energy. 73:115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Li B, Yang X, Wang Q. 2015. A development of a rating method and weighting system for green store buildings in China. Renew Energy. 73:123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang J, Hu F, Wang Y. 2017. Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China, Britain, United States. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 68:262–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar