Analyzing the characteristics of design defect leading indicators on building construction projects

References

• [AIA] American Institute of Architects. 2007. Integrated Project Delivery: a Guide. Sacramento, CA. p. 62.
   Google Scholar
• Abdallah A, Assaf S, Hassanain A. 2019. Assessment of the consequences of deficiencies in design documents in Saudi Arabia. Architect Engng Design Manage. 15(4):282–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbiyikli R, Eaton D. 2012. Design and design management in building projects: a review. Eng Sci. 7:322–333.
   Google Scholar
• Andi, Minato T. 2003. Design documents quality in the Japanese construction industry: factors influencing and impacts on construction process. Int J Project Manage. 21(7):537–546.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Hassanain MA, Abdallah A. 2018. Review and assessment of the causes of deficiencies in design documents for large construction projects. IJBPA. 36(3):300–317.
   Google Scholar
• Austin S, Baldwin A, Li B, Waskett P. 2000. Application of the analytical design planning technique to construction project management. Project Manage J. 31(2):48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin AN, Austin SA, Hassan TM, Thorpe A. 1999. Modelling information flow during the conceptual and schematic stages of building design. Construct Manage Eco. 17(2):155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T. 1967. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby L, Austin S, Bouchlaghem NM. 2003a. Defining an improvement plan to address design management practices within a UK construction company.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby L, Bouchlaghem D, Austin S. 2003b. Design management in practice: testing a training initiative to deliver tools and learning. Construct Innov. 3(4):217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Burati JL, Farrington JJ, Ledbetter WB. 1992. Causes of quality deviations in design and construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 118(1):34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. AMR. 32(4):1246–1264.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev. 14(4):532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamil Y, Abdul Rahman I. 2020. Assessment of critical factors contributing to construction failure in Yemen. Intern J Construct Manage. 20(5):429–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL. 2021. Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: the role of active categorization in theory building. AMR. 46(3):591–612.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson PE, Larsson B, Li H. 2002. Illustrative benchmarking rework and rework costs in Swedish construction industry. J Manage Eng. 18(2):76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knotten V, Lædre O, Hansen GK. 2017. Building design management–key success factors. Architect Engng Design Manage. 13(6):479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo HJ, O’Connor JT. 2021. Complexity analysis of design deliverable defects on building projects. J Manage Eng. 37(3):04021014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo HJ, O’Connor JT. 2022. A strategy for building design quality improvement through BIM capability analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 148(8):04022066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PE, Lopez R, Kim JT, Kim MJ. 2014. Probabilistic assessment of design error costs. J Perform Constr Facil. 28(3):518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor JT, Koo HJ. 2021. Proactive design quality assessment tool for building projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 147(2):04020174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen R, Amor R, Palmer M, Dickinson J, Tatum CB, Kazi AS, Prins M, Kiviniemi A, East B. 2010. Challenges for integrated design and delivery solutions. Architect Engng Design Manage. 6(4):232–240.
   Google Scholar
• Searle JR, Willis S. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian R, Arch B. 2002. Enhancing international multi-architect collaborative building projects through architectural design management. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchanges in Asia. Chongqing– China.
   Google Scholar
• Shoar S, Payan S. 2022. A qualitative system dynamics approach to modeling the causes and effects of design deficiencies in construction projects. JFM. 20(4):558–569.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sutrisna M, Goulding J. 2019. Managing information flow and design processes to reduce design risks in offsite construction projects. ECAM. 26(2):267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Tribelsky E, Sacks R. 2010. Measuring information flow in the detailed design of construction projects. Res Eng Design. 21(3):189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer J, Hartmann A, van der Horst A, Dewulf G. 2020. Multi-criteria decision analysis and quality of design decisions in infrastructure tenders: a contractor’s perspective. Construction Management and Economics. 38(2):172–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap JBH, Abdul-Rahman H, Wang C. 2018. Preventive mitigation of overruns with project communication management and continuous learning: PLS-SEM approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(5):4018025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap JBH, Skitmore M, Gray J, Shavarebi K. 2019. Systemic view to understanding design change causation and exploitation of communications and knowledge. Project Management Journal. 50(3):288–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2003. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar