Optimizing contractor’s accruals under conditions of penalty imposition due to unforeseen delays

References

• Abbasi GY, Mukattash AM. 2001. Crashing PERT networks using mathematical programming. Int J Project Manage. 19(3):181–188. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00061-7.
   Google Scholar
• Aghaie A, Mokhtari H. 2009. Ant colony optimization algorithm for stochastic project crashing problem in PERT networks using MC simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 45(11-12):1051–1067. doi: 10.1007/s00170-009-2051-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agyei W. 2015. Project planning and scheduling using PERT and CPM techniques with linear programming: case study. Int J Sci. Technol. Res.. 4(8):222–227.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed SM, Azhar S, Castillo M, Kappagantula P. 2002. Construction delays in Florida: an empirical study. Florida, US: Department of Community Affairs. Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Alavifar AH, Motamedi S. 2014 . Identification, evaluation and classification of time delay risks of construction project in Iran. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. p. 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Aminbakhsh S, Sonmez R. 2016. Discrete particle swarm optimization method for the large-scale discrete time–cost trade-off problem. Expert Syst Appl. 51:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.12.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Lorenzo L. 2019. How to apply penalties to avoid delays in projects. Eur J Oper Res. 275(2):608–620. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çebi F, Otay İ. 2015. A fuzzy multi-objective model for solving project network problem with bonus and incremental penalty cost. Comput. Ind. Eng. 82:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty A, Prakash O. 2020. Identification of clandestine groundwater pollution sources using heuristics optimization algorithms: a comparison between simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization. Environ Monit Assess. 192(12):791. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08691-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan DW, Kumaraswamy MM. 1997. A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 15(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00039-7.
   Google Scholar
• Chassiakos AP, Sakellaropoulos SP. 2005. Time-cost optimization of construction projects with generalized activity constraints. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(10):1115–1124. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1115).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitra K, Halder P. 2017. Scheduling project crashing time using linear programming approach: case study. Int J Res Ind Eng. 6(4):283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack MM. 1985. The use of integer linear programming for modelling project control information. Constr Manage Econ. 3(2):91–104. doi: 10.1080/01446198500000008.
   Google Scholar
• Datta B, Petit C, Palliser M, Esfahani HK, Prakash O. 2017. Linking a simulated annealing based optimization model with pht3d simulation model for chemically reactive transport processes to optimally characterize unknown contaminant sources in a former mine site in Australia. JWARP. 09(05):432–454. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2017.95028.
   Google Scholar
• de Soto BG, Rosarius A, Rieger J, Chen Q, Adey BT. 2017. Using a Tabu-search algorithm and 4D models to improve construction project schedules. Procedia Eng. 196:698–705. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.236.
   Google Scholar
• El-Kholy AM. 2021. Exploring the best ANN model based on four paradigms to predict delay and cost overrun percentages of highway projects. Int J Constr Manage. 21(7):694–712. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1580001.
   Google Scholar
• Elmabrouk O, Aljiebali F. 2012. Crashing project activities using linear programming technique. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Eshtehardian E, Afshar A, Abbasnia R. 2008. Time–cost optimization: using GA and fuzzy sets theory for uncertainties in cost. Constr Manage Econ. 26(7):679–691. doi: 10.1080/01446190802036128.
   Google Scholar
• Farida Y, Anenda LP. 2022. Network planning analysis on road construction projects by CV. X using evaluation review technique (PERT)-critical path method (CPM) and crashing method. Int J Integr Eng. 14(4):377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondahl JW. 1961. A non-computer approach to the critical path method for the construction industry. Tech. Rep. No. 9, Constr. Inst., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
   Google Scholar
• Fulkerson DR. 1961. A network flow computation for project cost curves. Manage Sci. 7(2):167–178. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.7.2.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway PD. 2006. Survey of the construction industry relative to the use of CPM scheduling for construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 132(7):697–711. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:7(697).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General D. 2016. Analysis of rates for Delhi. New Delhi, India: A Government of India Publications. p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• General D. 2016. Analysis of rates for Delhi. New Delhi, India: A Government of India Publications. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gümüsoglu S, Tütek H. 1998. An analysis method in project management using primal-dual relationships. Int J Project Manage. 16(5):321–327. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00057-4.
   Google Scholar
• Halloum MA, Bajracharya A. 2012. Cost and time overrun revisited: a study on the infrastructure construction projects in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Proceeding of the Third International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries. p. 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MA, Raiymbekov D, Nadeem A, Kim JR. 2022. Delay causes in Kazakhstan’s construction projects and remedial measures. Int J Constr Manage. 22(5):801–819.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MN. 2004. Crashing project time with least cost: a linear programming approach. Available at SSRN 1012525.
   Google Scholar
• Jahren CT, Ashe AM. 1990. Predictors of cost-overrun rates. J Constr Eng Manage. 116(3):548–552. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(548).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang A, Zhu Y. 2010. A multi-stage approach to time-cost trade-off analysis using mathematical programming. Int J Constr Manage. 10(3):13–27. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2010.10773147.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RM, Babu RII. 2020. Time and cost overruns in the UAE construction industry: a critical analysis. Int J Constr Manage. 20(5):402–411. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1484864.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley JE, Jr, Walker MR. 1959. Critical-path planning and scheduling. In Paper presented at: the December 1–3, 1959, eastern joint IRE-AIEE-ACM Computer Conference. 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa HAEW, Alharbi MG, Kumar P. 2021. On determining the critical path of activity network with normalized heptagonal fuzzy data. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2021:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2021/6699403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klafszky E, Hajdu M. 1993. An algorithm to solve the cost optimization problem through an activity on arrow type network (CPM/cost problem). Period Polytech Archit. 37(1-4):27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JK. 2008. Cost overrun and cause in Korean social overhead capital projects: roads, rails, airports, and ports. J Urban Plann Dev. 134(2):59–62. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:2(59).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AH, Kang HY, Huang TT. 2017. Project management model for constructing a renewable energy plant. Procedia Eng. 174:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.186.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company. 2016. Imagining construction’s digital future. [accessed 2019 May 21]. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-future.
   Google Scholar
• Perera S. 1980. Linear programming solution to network compression. J Constr Div. 106(3):315–326. doi: 10.1061/JCCEAZ.0000899.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan C, Narayanan S, Idrus AB. 2012. Construction delays causing risks on time and cost-a critical review. CEB. 12(1):37–57. doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v12i1.2330.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijver A. 1998. Theory of linear and integer programming. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Theory+of+Linear+and+Integer+Programming-p-9780471982326
   Google Scholar
• Senouci A, Ismail A, Eldin N. 2016. Time delay and cost overrun in Qatari public construction projects. Procedia Eng. 164:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.632.
   Google Scholar
• Subramani T, Sruthi P, Kavitha M. 2014. Causes of cost overrun in construction. IOSRJEN. 4(6):01–07. doi: 10.9790/3021-04640107.
   Google Scholar
• Sweis GJ. 2013. Factors affecting time overruns in public construction projects: the case of Jordan. IJBM. 8(23):120. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v8n23p120.
   Google Scholar
• Trietsch D, Baker KR. 2012. PERT 21: fitting PERT/CPM for use in the 21st century. Int J Project Manage. 30(4):490–502. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang IT. 2007. Performing complex project crashing analysis with aid of particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Project Manage. 25(6):637–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.001.
   Google Scholar