Evaluating the impact of organizational learning on organizational performance through organizational innovation as a mediating variable: evidence from Iranian construction companies

References

• Al Rfoa SK, Jaafar M, Mohd Raslim F. 2023. Influences of high-performance work practices on trust in organisation in Jordanian construction firms. Int J Constr Manage. 23(10):1715–1725. in press. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.2006415.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Resn Org Behav. 10(1):123–167.
   Google Scholar
• Aragón-Correa JA, García-Morales VJ, Cordón-Pozo E. 2007. Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: lessons from Spain. Ind Market Manage. 36(3):349–359. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda C, Arellano J, Davila A. 2017. Organizational learning in target setting. AMJ. 60(3):1189–1211. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0897.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong M. 2017. Armstrong on reinventing performance management: building a culture of continuous improvement. London, UK: Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Banmairuroy W, Kritjaroen T, Homsombat W. 2022. The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation’s component factors: evidence from Thailand’s new S-curve industries. Asia Pacific Manage Rev. 27(3):200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Sinkula JM. 1999. Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: integrating and extending models of organizational performance. J Mark Focus Manage. 4(4):295–308. doi: 10.1023/A:1009830402395.
   Google Scholar
• Bates R, Khasawneh S. 2005. Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations. Int J Train Dev. 9(2):96–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2005.00224.x.
   Google Scholar
• Brown R. 2005. Performing arts creative enterprise: approaches to promoting entrepreneurship in arts higher education. Int J Entrep Innov. 6(3):159–167. doi: 10.5367/0000000054662836.
   Google Scholar
• Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. 2018. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. Malays J Med Sci. 25(6):85–99. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y. 2002. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Mark Manage. 31(6):515–524. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JP. 1990. An overview of the army selection and classification project (Project A). Pers Psychol. 43(2):231–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01556.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan DWM, Cristofaro M, Nassereddine H, Yiu NSN, Sarvari H. 2021. Perceptions of safety climate in construction projects between workers and managers/supervisors in the developing country of Iran. Sustainability. 13(18):10398. doi: 10.3390/su131810398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman JA. 1989. Improving interactional organizational research: a model of person-organization fit. Acad Manage Rev. 14(3):333–349. doi: 10.2307/258171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinowsky P, Molenaar K, Realph A. 2007. Learning organizations in construction. J Manage Eng. 23(1):27–34. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:1(27).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopani H, Hayat AA, Zarekhalili M. 2010. Learning organizations; an inevitable essential for maintaining competitive advantage of organizations: an approach based on education and research. Proceedings of the First National Conference of Education and Research Managers, Mashhad [In Persian].
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ. 2006. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 119(2):166.e7–e7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faridi Zingir A, Moharamzadeh M, Imanzadeh M. 2020. Designing a model organizational inertia based on employees empowerment of sport and youth general offices in north west of the country. Sci J Org Behav Manage in Sport Stud. 7(1):53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimzadeh R. 2005. The effect of knowledge management on the learning organization. Proceedings of the Third International Management Conference. [In Persian] .
   Google Scholar
• Ekung S, Opoku A, Okonkwo C. 2022. Organisational learning and sustainability of service-based firms: a canonical correlation analysis. Int J Constr Manage. :1–11. in press. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2045863.
   Google Scholar
• Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. 1984. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 74(9):979–983. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Morales VJ, Jiménez-Barrionuevo MM, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez L. 2012. Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. J Bus Res. 65(7):1040–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García‐Morales VJ, Llorens‐Montes FJ, Verdú‐Jover AJ. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Ind Manage Data Syst. 106(1):21–42. doi: 10.1108/02635570610642940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Morales VJ, Lloréns-Montes FJ, Verdu-Jover AJ. 2007. Influence of personal mastery on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation in large firms and SMEs. Technovation. 27(9):547–568. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanizadeh V, Habibi BH. 2012. The effect of intellectual capital and learning process on organizational performance. Q J Hum Res Stud. 2(1):89–110. [In Persian]
   Google Scholar
• Gunday G, Ulusoy G, Kilic K, Alpkan L. 2011. Effects of innovation types on firm performance. Int J Prod Econ. 133(2):662–676. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haseeb M, Hussain HI, Kot S, Androniceanu A, Jermsittiparsert K. 2019. Role of social and technological challenges in achieving a sustainable competitive advantage and sustainable business performance. Sustainability. 11(14):3811. doi: 10.3390/su11143811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms JE, Henze KT, Sass TL, Mifsud VA. 2006. Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. Couns Psychol. 34(5):630–660. doi: 10.1177/0011000006288308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernaus T, Škerlavaj M, Dimovski V. 2008. Relationship between organisational learning and organisational performance: the case of Croatia. Transform Bus Econ. 7(2):32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongal P, Kinange U. 2020. A study on talent management and its impact on organization performance-an empirical review. IJEMR. 10(01):64–71. doi: 10.31033/ijemr.10.1.12.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. 2008. Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studiesp. 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structu Eq Model. 6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber GP. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Org Sci. 2(1):88–115. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber G. 1998. Synergies between organizational learning and creativity & innovation. Creat Inn Man. 7(1):3–8. doi: 10.1111/1467-8691.00079.
   Google Scholar
• Hung RYY, Lien BYH, Yang B, Wu CM, Kuo YM. 2011. Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. Int Bus Rev. 20(2):213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley RF, Hult GTM. 1998. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J Mark. 62(3):42–54. doi: 10.1177/002224299806200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspersen JG, Montibeller G. 2020. On the learning patterns and adaptive behavior of terrorist organizations. Eur J Oper Res. 282(1):221–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen PE. 2005. A contextual theory of learning and the learning organization. Knowl Process Mgmt. 12(1):53–64. doi: 10.1002/kpm.217.
   Google Scholar
• Koc T, Ceylan C. 2007. Factors impacting the innovative capacity in large-scale companies. Technovation. 27(3):105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoghiorghes C, Awbre SM, Feurig PL. 2005. Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Hum Res Dev Q. 16(2):185–212. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1133.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshfetrat R, Sarvari H, Chan DWM, Rakhshanifar M. 2022. Critical risk factors for implementing building information modelling (BIM): a Delphi-based survey. Int J Constr Manage. 22(12):2375–2384. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1788759.
   Google Scholar
• Kim WC, Mauborgne R. 1999. Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 40(3):41.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof W. 1963. The statistical theory of stepped-up reliability coefficients when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts. Psychometrika. 28(3):221–238. doi: 10.1007/BF02289571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kululanga GK, Price AD, McCaffer R. 2002. Empirical investigation of construction contractors’ organizational learning. J Constr Eng Manage. 128(5):385–391. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(385).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry EM. 2000. Scrolling around the new organization: the potential for conflict in the on‐line environment. Negot J. 16(2):133–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00209.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes FJL, Moreno AR, Morales VG. 2005. Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: an empirical examination. Technovation. 25(10):1159–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad HI. 2019. Mediating effect of organizational learning and moderating role of environmental dynamism on the relationship between strategic change and firm performance. JSMA. 12(2):275–297. doi: 10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0064.
   Google Scholar
• Neely AD, Adams C, Kennerley M. 2002. The performance prism: the scorecard for measuring and managing business success. London: Prentice Hall Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Ng PT. 2004. The learning organisation and the innovative organisation. HSM. 23(2):93–100. doi: 10.3233/HSM-2004-23204.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Org Sci. 5(1):14–37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SY, Han HS. 2020. Facilitating organisational learning activities: types of organisational culture and their influence on organisational learning and performance. Knowl Manage Res Pract. 18(1):1–15. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2018.1538668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluleye BI, Chan DWM, Saka AB, Olawumi TO. 2022. Circular economy research on building construction and demolition waste: a review of current trends and future research directions. J Cleaner Prod. 357:131927. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsad B, Delavaripour J, Tavashbakhsh H. 2010. Investigating the relationship between innovation, organizational learning and organizational performance . Proceedings of the First International Conference on Management and Innovation, Shiraz. [In Persian].
   Google Scholar
• Oyewobi LO, Windapo AO, Rotimi JOB, Jimoh RA. 2019. Determining strategic clusters and performance of construction organizations in South Africa. Int J Constr Manage. 19(1):46–56. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2017.1382084.
   Google Scholar
• Perez Lopez S, Montes Peon JM, Vazquez Ordas CJ. 2005. Human resource practices, organizational learning and business performance. Hum Res Dev Int. 8(2):147–164. doi: 10.1080/13678860500100103.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn JB. 2000. Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 41(4):13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiq M, Zhang X, Yuan J, Naz S, Maqbool S. 2020. Impact of a balanced scorecard as a strategic management system tool to improve sustainable development: measuring the mediation of organizational performance through PLS-smart. Sustainability. 12(4):1365. doi: 10.3390/su12041365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajapathirana RJ, Hui Y. 2018. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. J Innov Knowl. 3(1):44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter D, Meyer W, Parrott L, Baker D, Grace P. 2018. Increasing the effectiveness of environmental decision support systems: lessons from climate change adaptation projects in Canada and Australia. Reg Environ Change. 18(4):1173–1184. doi: 10.1007/s10113-017-1255-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rianto MR, Jasfar F, Arafah W. 2021. Mediating effect of organization learning on the relationship between strategic change, knowledge management and transformational leadership: case of Indonesian Islamic Banks. JEDEP. 10(3):26–49. doi: 10.26458/jedep.v10i3.697.
   Google Scholar
• Sari TDR, Sukmasari D. 2018. Does organizational learning and innovation influence performance? JBE. 6(1):22–25. doi: 10.12691/jbe-6-1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmad V. 1997. Research methods in behavioral sciences. Bazargan A, Hejazi E, editor. Tehran: Publishing House. [In Persian]
   Google Scholar
• Sarvari H, Chan DWM, Fakhir AK, Olawumi TO, Aldaud AAK. 2021. Critical success factors for managing construction small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries of Middle East: evidence from Iranian construction enterprises. J Build Eng. 43:103152. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka AB, Chan DWM, Mahamadu AM. 2022. Rethinking the digital divide of BIM adoption in the AEC industry. J Manage Eng. - Special Issue on Re-thinking the Benefits of Adopting Digital Technologies in the AEC Industry 38(2):04021092, 11 pages. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RC. 1997. Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis Sci. 28(3):763–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge PM. 2006. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York, USA: Broadway Business.
   Google Scholar
• Sopa A, Asbari M, Purwanto A, Santoso PB, Mustofa DH, Maesaroh S, Primahendra R. 2020. Hard skills versus soft skills: which are more important for Indonesian employees innovation capability. Int J Control Autom. 13(2):156–175.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart J. 2005. The current state and status of HRD research. Learn Org. 12(1):90–95. doi: 10.1108/09696470510574287.
   Google Scholar
• Tajeddini K, Trueman M, Larsen G. 2006. Examining the effect of market orientation on innovativeness. J Mark Manage. 22(5-6):529–551. doi: 10.1362/026725706777978640.
   Google Scholar
• Tavassolirizi M, Sarvari H, Chan DWM, Olawumi TO. 2022. Factors affecting delays in rail transportation projects using Analytic Network Process: the case of Iran. Int J Constr Manage. 22(14):2712–2723. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1819946.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas SL, Bretz RD. Jr, 1994. Research and practice in performance appraisal: evaluating employee performance in America’s largest companies. SAM Adv Manage J. 59(2):28.
   Google Scholar
• Therin F. 2003. Organizational learning and innovation in high-tech small firms. In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the IEEE . p. 8). doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174262.
   Google Scholar
• Wang CL, Ahmed PK. 2003. Organisational learning: a critical review. Learn Organ. 10(1):8–17. doi: 10.1108/09696470310457469.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wang N. 2012. Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Syst Appl. 39(10):8899–8908. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker RM. 2004. Innovation and organisational performance: evidence and a research agenda. Adv Inst Manage Res Paper. 002. 0–56. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1306909.
   Google Scholar
• Winch G. 1998. Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Build Res Inf. 26(5):268–279. doi: 10.1080/096132198369751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. 2006. 4 reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. Handb Stat. 26:81–124.
   Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm Sci Q. 38(3):357–381. doi: 10.2307/2393372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton B, Muthen B, Alwin DF, Summers GF. 1977. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol Methodol. 8:84–136. doi: 10.2307/270754.
   Google Scholar
• Wong PSP, Cheung SO, Leung KY. 2008. Moderating effect of organizational learning type on performance improvement. J Manage Eng. 24(3):162–172. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:3(162).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasa N, Giantari IGAK, Setini M, Rahmayanti PJMSL. 2020. The role of competitive advantage in mediating the effect of promotional strategy on marketing performance. 105267/jmsl. 10(12):2845–2848. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.024.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin S, Mavondo F, Gunasekaran A, Sarros JC. 1997. A study of competitive strategy, organisational innovation and organisational performance among Australian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ. 52(1-2):161–172. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00104-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo R. 2003. Linking organisational learning to organisational performance and success: Singapore case studies. Leadersh Org Dev J. 24(2):70–83. doi: 10.1108/01437730310463260.
   Google Scholar
• Yurdugül H. 2008. Minimum sample size for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: a Monte-Carlo study. Hacet Üniv Eğit Fak Derg. 35(35):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zgrzywa-Ziemak A. 2015. The impact of organisational learning on organisational performance. MBACE. 23(4):98–112. doi: 10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.159.
   Google Scholar