Influence of cost contingency management on project estimates at completion

References

• Adafin J, Rotimi JOB, Wilkinson S. 2016. Risk impact assessments in project budget development: architects’ perspectives. Architect Eng Des Manage. 12(3):189–204. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1152228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbari FT. 2003. Earned Value Project Management method and extensions. Project Manage J. 34(4):12–23. doi: 10.1177/875697280303400403.
   Google Scholar
• Babar S, Thaheem MJ, Ayub B. 2017. Estimated cost at completion: integrating risk into Earned Value Management. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(3):04016104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccarini D. 2004. Estimating project cost contingency: a model and exploration of research questions. 20th Annual ARCOM Conference. 1(Ciria 1996); p. 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Balali A, Valipour A, Antucheviciene J, Šaparauskas J. 2020. Improving the results of the earned value management technique using artificial neural networks in construction projects. Symmetry. 12(10):1745. doi: 10.3390/sym12101745.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez P, Sanz-Ablanedo E, Mora-Melià D, González-Cruz MC, Fuentes-Bargues JL, Pellicer E. 2019. Earned schedule min-max: two new EVM metrics for monitoring and controlling projects. Autom Constr. 103:279–290. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraza GA, Asce M, Bueno RA. 2007. Cost contingency management. J Manage Eng. 23(3):140–146. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:3(140).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batselier J, Vanhoucke M. 2015. Construction and evaluation framework for a real-life project database. Int J Project Manage. 33(3):697–710. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batselier J, Vanhoucke M. 2016. Practical application and empirical evaluation of reference class forecasting for project management. Project Manage J. 47(5):36–51. doi: 10.1177/875697281604700504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon DM. 1998. Implementing earned value easily and effectively. Project Manage J. 29(2):11–18. doi: 10.1177/875697289802900204.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HL, Chen WT, Lin YL. 2016. Earned value project management: improving the predictive power of planned value. Int J Project Manage. 34(1):22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhry RM, Rafiq S, Ahmed A, Ahmed T. 2018. Estimating probabilistic cost and time contingency for residential building projects. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering (ICCSTE'18); p. 134.1–134.7. doi: 10.11159/iccste18.134.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen DS, Antolini RC, McKinney JW. 1995. A review of estimate at completion research. J Cost Analysis. 12(1):41–62. doi: 10.1080/08823871.1995.10462292.
   Google Scholar
• Cioffi DF. 2005. A tool for managing projects: an analytic parameterization of the S-curve. Int J Project Manage. 23(3):215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Covach J, Haydon JJ, Riether RO. 1981. A study to determine indicators and methods to compute estimate at completion (EAC). Herndon (VA): manTech International Corporation; p. 30.
   Google Scholar
• De Marco A, Narbaev T, Rafele C, Cagliano AC. 2017. Integrating risk in project cost forecasting. Proceedings of the Summer School Francesco Turco, 2017; p. 117–122.
   Google Scholar
• De Marco A, Rafele C, Thaheem MJ. 2016. Dynamic management of risk contingency in complex design-build projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(2):04015080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshaer R. 2013. Impact of sensitivity information on the prediction of project’s duration using earned schedule method. Int J Project Manage. 31(4):579–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Ayyash A. 2014. Factors affecting cost contingency in the construction industry—contractors’ perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 14(3):191–208. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2014.922729.
   Google Scholar
• Firouzi A, Khayyati M. 2020. Bayesian updating of copula-based probabilistic project-duration model. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(5):04020046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford DN. 2002. Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management. J Constr Eng Manage. 128(1):30–39. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(30).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedi J, Yunna W, Qing C. 2015. Research on optimization of earned value management method in engineering budget management. TOCIEJ. 9(1):369–375. doi: 10.2174/1874149501509010369.
   Google Scholar
• Hammad MW, Abbasi A, Ryan MJ. 2016. Allocation and management of cost contingency in projects. J Manage Eng. 32(6):04016014. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzeh AM, Mousavi SM, Gitinavard H. 2020. Imprecise earned duration model for time evaluation of construction projects with risk considerations. Autom Constr. 111(October 2019):102993. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102993.
   Google Scholar
• Hartono B. 2018. From project risk to complexity analysis: a systematic classification. IJMPB. 11(3):734–760. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2017-0108.
   Google Scholar
• Hoseini E, Bosch-Rekveldt M, Hertogh M. 2020. Cost contingency and cost evolvement of construction projects in the preconstruction phase. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(6):05020006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzner H. 2017. A systems approach to planning scheduling and controlling. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Khamooshi H, Golafshani H. 2014. EDM: earned duration management, a new approach to schedule performance management and measurement. Int J Project Manage. 32(6):1019–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B-C. 2015. Integrating risk assessment and actual performance for probabilistic project cost forecasting: a second moment Bayesian model. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 62(2):158–170. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2015.2404935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B-C. 2016. Probabilistic evaluation of cost performance stability in Earned Value Management. J Manage Eng. 32(1):04015025. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B-C, Kwak YH. 2018. Improving the accuracy and operational predictability of project cost forecasts: an adaptive combination approach. Product Plan Ctrl. 29(9):743–760. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1467511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B-C, Pinto JK. 2019. What CPI = 0.85 really means: a probabilistic extension of the estimate at completion. J Manage Eng. 35(2):04018059. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B-C, Reinschmidt KF. 2011. Combination of project cost forecasts in Earned Value Management. J Constr Eng Manage. 137(11):958–966. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DB, White ED, Ritschel JD, Millette CA. 2019. Revisiting reliability of estimates at completion for department of defense contracts. JOPP. 19(3):186–200. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-02-2018-0006.
   Google Scholar
• Konior J, Szóstak M. 2021. Cumulative cost spent on construction projects of different sectors. cea. 9(4):999–1011. doi: 10.13189/cea.2021.090404.
   Google Scholar
• Kose T, Bakici T, Hazir O. 2022. Completing projects on time and budget: a study on the analysis of project monitoring practices using real data. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 1–12. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3227428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipke W. 2003. Schedule is different. Measur. News, 2:31–34. http://www.pmi-cpm.org/members/library/Schedule Is Different.lipke.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lipke W, Zwikael O, Henderson K, Anbari F. 2009. Prediction of project outcome. Int J Project Manage. 27(4):400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo-Alvarez L, Alvarez-Risco A, Del-Aguila-Arcentales S, Sekar MC, Yáñez JA. 2022. A systematic review of Earned Value Management methods for monitoring and control of project schedule performance: an AHP approach. Sustainability. 14(22):15259. doi: 10.3390/su142215259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narbaev T, De Marco A. 2011. Cost estimate at completion methods in construction projects. 2011 International Conference on Construction and Project Management, 15 September; p. 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Narbaev T, De Marco A. 2014a. Combination of growth model and earned schedule to forecast project cost at completion. J Constr Eng Manage. 140(1):04013038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narbaev T, De Marco A. 2014b. An earned schedule-based regression model to improve cost estimate at completion. Int J Project Manage. 32(6):1007–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narbaev T, De Marco A. 2017. Earned value and cost contingency management: a framework model for risk adjusted cost forecasting. J Modern Project Manage. 4(3):12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Oh S, Rhodes J, Strong R. 2016. Impact of cost uncertainty on pricing decisions under risk aversion. Eur J Oper Res. 253(1):144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORSRG. 2023. Operations Research & Scheduling Research Group - Real project data. https://www.projectmanagement.ugent.be/research/data/realdata.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz JI, Pellicer E, Molenaar KR. 2018. Management of time and cost contingencies in construction projects: a contractor perspective. J Civil Engng Manage. 24(3):254–264. doi: 10.3846/jcem.2018.1643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipova E, Eriksson PE. 2013. Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: lessons learned from two construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 31(3):391–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pich MT, Loch CH, de Meyer A. 2002. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Manage Sci. 48(8):1008–1023. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PMI. 2009. Practice standard for project risk management. Newton Square (PA): PMI.
   Google Scholar
• Proaño-Narváez M, Flores-Vázquez C, Vásquez Quiroz P, Avila-Calle M. 2022. Earned Value Method (EVM) for construction projects: current application and future projections. Buildings. 12(3):301. doi: 10.3390/buildings12030301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning NP, Sterman JD. 2002. Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: creating and sustaining process improvement. IEEE Eng Manag Rev. 30(4):64–64. doi: 10.1109/EMR.2002.1167285.
   Google Scholar
• Rezakhani P. 2022. Hybrid fuzzy-Bayesian decision support tool for dynamic project scheduling and control under uncertainty. Intern J Construct Manage. 22(15):2864–2876. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1828539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simion CP, Marin I. 2018. Project cost estimate at completion: earned value management versus earned schedule-based regression models. a comparative analysis of the models application in the construction projects in romania. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res. 52(3):205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su G, Khallaf R. 2022. Research on the influence of risk on construction project performance: a systematic review. Sustainability. 14(11):6412. doi: 10.3390/su14116412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamhain H. 2013. Managing risks in complex projects. Project Manage J. 44(2):20–35. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert G. 2005. Residual risk reduction. Prof Saf. (November):25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Traynor BA, Mahmoodian M. 2019. Time and cost contingency management using Monte Carlo simulation. Aust J Civ Eng. 17(1):11–18. doi: 10.1080/14488353.2019.1606499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy G, Hazır Ö. 2021. Recent developments and some promising research areas. In: An introduction to project modeling and planning. Cham: Springer; p. 457–469.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzafer M. 2013. A contingency estimation model for software projects. Int J Project Manage. 31(7):981–993. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoorde S, Vanhoucke M. 2006. A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics. Int J Project Manage. 24(4):289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M. 2023. The illusion of control: project data, computer algorithms and human intuition for project management and control. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M, Coelho J, Batselier J. 2016. An overview of project data for integrated project management and control. J Modern Project Manage. 3(3):6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M, Vandevoorde S. 2007. A simulation and evaluation of earned value metrics to forecast the project duration. J Oper Res Soc. 58(10):1361–1374. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton RDH, Cioffi DF. 2016. Estimating a project’s earned and final duration. Int J Project Manage. 34(8):1493–1504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton RDH, De Marco A, Sciuto F. 2017. Earned schedule formulation using nonlinear cost estimates at completion. J Modern Project Manage. 5(1):75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Xie H, AbouRizk S, Zou J. 2012. Quantitative method for updating cost contingency throughout project execution. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(6):759–766. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar