Drivers and barriers on implementing XR technologies in the construction industry in Turkey

References

• Abubakar M, Ibrahim YM, Kado D, Bala K. 2014. Contractors’ perception of the factors affecting building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the Nigerian Construction Industry. International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. doi: 10.1061/9780784413616.022.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Sobuz MHR. 2019. Challenges of implementing lean construction in the construction industry in Bangladesh. SASBE. 9(2):174–207. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-02-2019-0018.
   Google Scholar
• AIA Firm Survey Report. 2018. https://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/2018-AIA-Firm-Survey-Overview.pdf., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye A. 2000. Analysis of factors influencing project cost. Constr Manage Econ. 18(1):77–89. doi: 10.1080/014461900370979.
   Google Scholar
• Aladag H, Demirdögen G, Isık Z. 2016. Building information modeling (BIM) use in Turkish construction industry. Procedia Eng. 161:174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.520.
   Google Scholar
• Alizadehsalehi S, Hadavi A, Huang JC. 2020. From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry. Autom Constr. 116:103254. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Momani AH. 2000. Construction delay: a quantitative analysis. Int J Project Manage. 18(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00060-X.
   Google Scholar
• AP. 2020. Insights into the augmented reality ındustry in Europe to 2025 – motivators, restraints and opportunities; [accessed 2022 Jan 13]. https://apnews.com/press-release/business-wire/technology-lifestyle-travel-europe-8562f2afc0ad4a4dad7815cd0fd8b42b.
   Google Scholar
• Arashpour M, Aranda-Mena G. 2017. Curriculum renewal in architecture, engineering, and construction education: visualizing building information modeling via augmented reality. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, Vol. 4 No. 1, doi: 10.14455/ISEC.res.2017.54.
   Google Scholar
• Arowoiya VA, Oke AE, Akanni PO, Kwofie TE, Enih PI. 2023. Augmented reality for construction revolution – analysis of critical success factors. Int J Constr Manage. 23(11):1867–1874. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.2017542.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf SA, Al-Hejji S. 2006. Causes of delay in large construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 24(4):349–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010.
   Google Scholar
• Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Kinshuk, Graf S. (2015). Mobile augmented reality in vocational education and training. Procedia Comput Sci. 75:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.203.
   Google Scholar
• Badamasi AA, Aryal KR, Makarfi UU, Dodo M. 2022. Drivers and barriers of virtual reality adoption in UK AEC industry. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 29(3):1307–1318. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banda G. 2018. A brief review of ındependent, dependent and one sample t-test. Int J Appl Math Theor Phys. 4(2):50–54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20180402.13.
   Google Scholar
• Beddiar K, Grellier C, Woods E. 2019. Construction 4.0: Reinventer le Batiment Grace au Numerique: BIM. In DfMA, Lean Management. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Belek Fialho Teixeira M, Pham K, Caldwell G, Seevinck J, Swann L, Rittenbruch M, Kelly N, Santo Y, Garcia-Hansen V, Voltz K. 2021. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), 2021; Hong Kong, Vol. 2; p. 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal M, Oyedele LO, Qadir J, Munir K, Ajayi SO, Akinade OO, Owolabi HA, Alaka HA, Pasha M. 2016. Big Data in the construction industry: a review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Adv Eng Inf. 30(3):500–521. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordel B, Alcarria R, Robles T, Martín D. 2017. Cyber–physical systems: extending pervasive sensing from control theory to the Internet of Things. Pervasive Mob Comput. 40:156–184. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruin J. 2006. Newtest: command to compute new test. UCLA Statistical Consulting Group; [accessed 2022 Jun 8]. https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/other/mult-pkg/faq/general/faq-what-are-the-differences-between-one-tailed-and-two-tailed-tests/.
   Google Scholar
• Businesswire. 2022. Augmented reality (AR) in the construction industry, 2022 thematic research report [accessed 2023 Jan 12]. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220601005690/en/Augmented-Reality-AR-in-the-Construction-Industry-2022-Thematic-Research-Report—Market-to-Grow-to-150-Billion-by-2030—ResearchAndMarkets.com.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsén A, Elfstrand O. 2018. Augmented construction: developing a framework for implementing building information modeling through augmented reality at construction sites. Computer Science. http://ltu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1215627/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson K, Winquist J. 2014. An introduction to statistics. In: Chapter 1: introduction to statistics and frequency distributions. Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cileli E. 2020. [BIM – based construction project’s association with IPD and adaptation of DSM for design phase in Turkey] [master thesis]. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Coupry C, Noblecourt S, Richard P, Baudry D, Bigaud D. 2021. BIM-based digital twin and XR devices to improve maintenance procedures in smart buildings: a literature review. Appl Sci. 11(15):6810. doi: 10.3390/app11156810.
   Google Scholar
• Dai F, Olorunfemi A, Peng W, Cao D, Luo X. 2021. Can mixed reality enhance safety communication on construction sites? An industry perspective. Saf Sci. 133:105009. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakhil A. 2013. [The contribution of the construction ındustry to economic development in Libya]. [doctoral dissertation]. Liverpool: Liverpool John Morres University. doi: 10.24377/LJMU.t.00004454.
   Google Scholar
• Davila Delgado JM, Oyedele L, Beach T, Demian P. 2020b. Augmented and virtual reality in construction: drivers and limitations for industry adoption. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(7):5. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila Delgado JM, Oyedele L, Demian P, Beach T. 2020a. A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction. Adv Eng Inf. 45:101122. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dris AS, Lehericey F, Gouranton V, Arnaldi B. 2019. OpenBIM based IVE ontology: an ontological approach to improve ınteroperability for virtual reality applications. In: Advances in informatics and computing in civil and construction; Chicago, USA: Springer Publications; p. 129–136. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_16.
   Google Scholar
• ECSO. 2021. Digitalisation in the construction sector analytical report. Brussels, Belgium: European Construction Sector Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• [EIBIS] European Investment Bank Investment Survey. 2019. [Accessed 2022 Jan 13]. https://www.eib.org/en/publications/econ-eibis-2019-eu.
   Google Scholar
• El Jazzar M, Urban H, Schranz C, Nassereddine H. (2020). Construction 4.0: a roadmap to shaping the future of construction. 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). doi: 10.22260/ISARC2020/0180.
   Google Scholar
• El-Jarn H, Southern G. 2020. Can co-creation in extended reality technologies facilitate the design process? JWAM. 12(2):191–205. doi: 10.1108/JWAM-04-2020-0022.
   Google Scholar
• Elmali O, Bayram S. 2022. Adoption of BIM concept in the Turkish AEC industry. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 46(1):435–452. doi: 10.1007/s40996-021-00768-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdik M, Tulubas Gokuc Y. 2020. Türk yapı sektöründe yapı bilgi modellemesinin adaptasyonu. In: Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi; Balikesir, Turkey: Balikesir University Publications; p. 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. JRC science for policy report.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadi M, Sepasgozar SM. 2020. An investigation of virtual reality technology adoption in the construction industry. In: Shirowzhan S, Zhang K, editors. Smart cities and construction technologies. London, UK: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.91351.
   Google Scholar
• Gunduz M, Nielsen Y, Ozdemir M. 2013. Quantification of delay factors using the relative ımportance ındex method for construction projects in Turkey. J Manage Eng. 29(2):133–139. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamurcu A, Timur Ş, Rızvanoğlu K. 2020. An overview of virtual reality within industrial design education. JEDT. 18(6):1889–1905. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-02-2020-0048.
   Google Scholar
• Hong SW, Jeong Y, Kalay YE, Jung S, Lee J. 2016. Enablers and barriers of the multi-user virtual environment for exploratory creativity in architectural design collaboration. CoDesign. 12(3):151–170. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2015.1081239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MDA, Nadeem A. 2019. Towards digitizing the construction industry: state of the art of construction 4.0. Interdependence between Structural Engineering and Construction Management Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hussien A, Waraich A, Paes D. 2020. A review of mixed-reality applications in Construction 4.0. Construction. 4:131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Kocakaya MN, Türkakin OH, Giran Ö. 2018. A review of BIM adoption in Turkey: practitioners’ viewpoint. Int J 3-D Inform Model. 7(4):59–68. doi: 10.4018/IJ3DIM.2018100104.
   Google Scholar
• IoT-Analytics. 2019 [accessed 2022 Dec 30]. https://iot-analytics.com/top-20-industrial-iot-trends-hannover- messe-2019/.
   Google Scholar
• Macka Kalfa S. 2018. Building information modeling (BIM) systems and their applications in Turkey. JCEMI. 1(1):55–66. doi: 10.31462/jcemi.2018.01055066.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsoom A, Zulqarnain M, Irfan M, Ullah F, Alqahtani FK, Khan KIA. 2023. Drivers of, and barriers to, the adoption of mixed reality in the construction industry of developing countries. Buildings. 13(4):872. doi: 10.3390/buildings13040872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Gutierrez J, Navarro RE, Gonzalez MA. 2011. Mixed reality for development of spatial skills of first-year engineering students. Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference. T2D-1.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. 2016. Imagining construction’s digital future. McKinsey and Company. [accessed 2022 Dec 30]. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/imaginingconstructions-digital-future.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey. 2020. The next normal in construction; p. 1–90. [accessed 2022 Dec 30]. https://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/McKinsey/Industries/Capital%20Projects%20and%20Infrastructure/Our%20Insights/The%20next%20norm al%20in%20construction/executive-summary_the-next-normal-in-construction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan J, Schumacher S. 2010. Research in education. Evidence base inquiry. 7th ed., international edition. Boston (MA): Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. 2016. The annual report 2015–16; [accessed 2021 Dec 30]. http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/mospi_annual_report_2015-16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Minopoulos G, Psannis KE. 2022. Opportunities and challenges of tangible XR applications for 5G networks and beyond. IEEE Consumer Electron Mag. 7(4). doi: 10.1109/MCE.2022.3156305.
   Google Scholar
• Noghabaei M, Heydarian A, Balali V, Han K. 2020. Trend analysis on adoption of virtual and augmented reality in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Data. 5(1):26. doi: 10.3390/data5010026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noruwa BI, Arewa AO, Merschbrock C. 2022. Effects of emerging technologies in minimising variations in construction projects in the UK. Int J Constr Manage. 22(11):2199–2206. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1772530.
   Google Scholar
• Ogwueleka AC, Ikediashi DI. 2017. The future of BIM technologies in Africa: prospects and challenges. In: Integrated building information modelling; Sharjah, U.A.E.: Bentham Science Publishers; p. 307–314.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Arowoiya VA. 2022. An analysis of the application areas of augmented reality technology in the construction industry. SASBE. 11(4):1081–1098. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-11-2020-0162.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson NOE, Shafqat A, Arica E, Økland A. 2019. 3D-printing technology in construction: results from a survey. In: Lill I, Witt E, editors. 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization (Emerald Reach Proceedings Series). Vol. 2. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; p. 349–356. doi: 10.1108/S2516-285320190000002044.
   Google Scholar
• Park CS, Lee D-Y, Kwon O-S, Wang X. 2013. A framework for proactive construction defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology-based data collection template. Autom Constr. 33:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pektaş ŞT, Özgüç B. 2011. Virtual prototyping for open building design. OHI. 36(4):46–56. doi: 10.1108/OHI-04-2011-B0005.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins Coie. 2020. Augmented and virtual reality survey report.
   Google Scholar
• Pekeriçli MK, Acartürk C, Tanyer AM. 2018. Sanal gerçeklik ve göz takibi uygulamaları ile ybm tabanlı tehlike analizi sistemi. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/58935.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicer E, Yepes J, Singh V, Bekr G. 2017. Resilient structures and sustainable construction edited by explorıng barrıers in implementıng buıldıng informatıon modelıng: a prelımınary study.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakaran A, Mahamadu AM, Mahdjoubi L. 2022. Understanding the challenges of immersive technology use in the architecture and construction industry: a systematic review. Autom Constr. 137(4):104228. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104228.
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi DS. 2017. Construction 4.0: the 4th Generation Revolution. The Indian Lean Construction Conference; p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers V, Sniderman B. 2018. The Industry 4.0 Paradox: overcoming disconnects on the path to digital transformation. Milwaukee (WI): Deloitte Consulting LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Sarshar M, Isikdag U. 2004. A survey of ICT use in the Turkish construction industry. Eng Const Arch Man. 11(4):238–247. doi: 10.1108/09699980410547595.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney A, Riley M, Irizarry J. 2020. Construction 4.0: an innovation platform for the built environment. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schnall S, Hedge C, Weaver R. 2012. The immersive virtual environment of the digital fulldome: considerations of relevant psychological processes. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 70(8):561–575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz J, Smith A. 2016. Augmented reality: designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Bus Horiz. 59(2):149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepasgozar SME, Ghobadi M, Shirowzhan S, Edwards DJ, Delzendeh E. 2021. Metrics development and modelling the mixed reality and digital twin adoption in the context of Industry 4.0. ECAM. 28(5):1355–1376. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0880.
   Google Scholar
• SEP–Startup Europe Partnership. 2018. Research highlights: digital construction and industry 4.0 [accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://startupeuropepartnership.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SEP-ResearchHighlights_Industry4.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sercan MR. 2019. [Turkey’s industry 4.0 potential and comparison with selected countries] [master’s thesis]. Ankara: Gazi University.
   Google Scholar
• Seyman Guray T, Kismet B. 2023. Applicability of a digitalization model based on augmented reality for building construction education in architecture. CI. 23(1):193–212. doi: 10.1108/CI-07-2021-0136.
   Google Scholar
• Stals A, Caldas L. 2022. State of XR research in architecture with focus on professional practice – a systematic literature review. Archit Sci Rev. 65(2):138–146. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2020.1838258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Succar B. 2009. Building information modelling maturity matrix. In: Handbook of research on building information modeling and construction ınformatics: concepts and technologies. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; p. 65–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sun C, Jiang S, Skibniewski MJ, Man Q, Shen L. 2015. A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 23(5):764–779. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1087071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafazzoli M, Shrestha PP. 2017. Investigating causes of delay in U.S. construction projects. 53rd ASC Annual International Conference; p. 611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Tezel E, Alatli L, Giritli H. 2021. Awareness and use of BIM for FM: empirical evidence from Turkey. The Proceedings of the 20th EuroFM Research Symposium 2021, European Facility Management Network; June; p. 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Toklu S, Güzelçoban Mayuk S. 2020. The implementation of building information modelling (BIM) in Turkey. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning (Iconarch-IV Proceeding Book); p. 87–100. https://iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarch/article/view/232.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble White Paper 01. 2020. Virtual, augmented, & mixed reality in construction; [accessed 2021 Dec 30]. https://www.enr.com/ext/resources/custom-content/Infocenter/2020/SiteVision/Whitepaper-01-Virtual-Augmented-_-Mixed-Reality-in-Construction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Uhomoibhi J, Onime C, Wang H. 2020. A study of developments and applications of mixed reality cubicles and their impact on learning. IJILT. 37(1–2):15–31. doi: 10.1108/IJILT-02-2019-0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2013. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, House of Representatives—VA construction—additional actions needed to decrease delays and lower costs of major medical-facility projects; [accessed 2021 Dec 30]. http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/653585.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu H, Kang S, Al-Hussein M. 2020. Virtual reality applications for the built environment: research trends and opportunities. Autom Constr. 118:103311. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidane YJT, Andersen B. 2018. The top 10 universal delay factors in construction projects. IJMPB. 11(3):650–672. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-05-2017-0052.
   Google Scholar
• Zoleykani MJ, Abbasianjahromi H, Banihashemi S, Tabadkani SA, Hajirasouli A. 2023. Extended reality (XR) technologies in the construction safety: systematic review and analysis. CI. 1–28. doi: 10.1108/CI-05-2022-0131.
   Google Scholar