Integration of blockchain in contract management for prevention of construction disputes: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework

References

• Abdul Nabi M, El-Adaway IH. 2022. Understanding disputes in modular construction projects: key common causes and their associations. J Constr Eng Manage. 148(1):04021184. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adel K, Elhakeem A, Marzouk M. 2023. Decentralized system for construction projects data management using blockchain and IPFS. J Civil Eng Manag. 29(4):342–359. doi: 10.3846/jcem.2023.18646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadisheykhsarmast S, Senji SG, Sonmez R. 2023. Decentralized tendering of construction projects using blockchain-based smart contracts and storage systems. Autom Constr. 151:104900. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed MO, Abdul Nabi M, El-Adaway IH, Caranci D, Eberle J, Hawkins Z, Sparrow R. 2021. Contractual guidelines for promoting integrated project delivery. J Constr Eng Manage. 147(11):05021008. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinosho TD, Oyedele LO, Bilal M, Ajayi AO, Delgado MD, Akinade OO, Ahmed AA. 2020. Deep learning in the construction industry: a review of present status and future innovations. J Build Eng. 32:101827. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali B, Zahoor H, Nasir AR, Maqsoom A, Khan RWA, Mazher KM. 2020. BIM-based claims management system: a centralized information repository for extension of time claims. Autom Constr. 110:102937. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrasheed KA, Soliman E, Almesbah FE. 2023. Dispute classification in construction projects based on litigation cases. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 15(3):04523013. doi: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arar AJ, Papineau C, Poirier E. 2023. An empirical evaluation of the causes leading to binding dispute resolution mechanisms in the Quebec construction industry. Int J Constr Manag. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2159632.
   Google Scholar
• Arcadis. 2021. Global Construction Disputes Report 2021: the road to early resolution. [Accessed 2022 April 08] https://www.arcadis.com/en/knowledge-hub/perspectives/global/global-construction-disputes-report.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Hassanain MA, Abdallah A, Sayed AMZ, Alshahrani A. 2019. Significant causes of claims and disputes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia. BEPAM. 9(5):597–615. doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-09-2018-0113.
   Google Scholar
• Awwad R, Barakat B, Menassa C. 2016. Understanding dispute resolution in the Middle East region from perspectives of different stakeholders. J Manage Eng. 32(6):05016019. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besaiso H, Fenn P, Emsley M, Wright D. 2018. A comparison of the suitability of FIDIC and NEC conditions of contract in Palestine: a perspective from the industry. ECAM. 25(2):241–256. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-10-2016-0235.
   Google Scholar
• Candaş AB, Tokdemir OB. 2022. Automated identification of vagueness in the FIDIC silver book conditions of contract. J Constr Eng Manage. 148(4):04022007. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaphalkar NB, Patil SK. 2012. Decision support system for dispute resolution in construction contracts. KSCE J Civ Eng. 16(4):499–504. doi: 10.1007/s12205-012-1303-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Liu M, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Hsiang SM, He C. 2023. Using images to detect, plan, analyze, and coordinate a smart contract in construction. J Manage Eng. 39(2):04023002. doi: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng JCP, Liu H, Gan VJL, Das M, Tao X, Zhou S. 2023. Construction cost management using blockchain and encryption. Autom Constr. 152:104841. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong HY, Cheng MY. 2023. Smart contract implementation in building information modeling-enabled projects: approach to contract administration. J Constr Eng Manage. 149(5):05023004. doi: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clack CD, Bakshi VA, Braine L. 2016. Smart contract templates: foundations, design landscape and research directions. Barclays Bank PLC (2016-2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00771.
   Google Scholar
• Das M, Luo H, Cheng JCP. 2020. Securing interim payments in construction projects through a blockchain-based framework. Autom Constr. 118:103284. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Tao X, Liu Y, Cheng JCP. 2022. A blockchain-based integrated document management framework for construction applications. Autom Constr. 133:104001. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Filippi P, Hassan S. 2016. Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: from code is law to law is code. FM. 21(12). doi: 10.5210/fm.v21i12.7113.
   Google Scholar
• Elghaish F, Abrishami S, Hosseini MR. 2020. Integrated project delivery with blockchain: an automated financial system. Autom Constr. 114(March):103182. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103182.
   Google Scholar
• Elghaish F, Hosseini MR, Kocaturk T, Arashpour M, Bararzadeh Ledari M. 2023. Digitalised circular construction supply chain: an integrated BIM-Blockchain solution. Autom Constr. 148:104746. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhag T, Eapen S, Ballal T. 2020. Moderating claims and disputes through collaborative procurement. CI. 20(1):79–95. doi: 10.1108/CI-02-2019-0020.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh S, Ahmad I, Aljanabi M, Herzallah R, Metry S, El-Ashwal O. 2020. Construction disputes in the UAE: causes and resolution methods. Buildings. 10(10):171. doi: 10.3390/buildings10100171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erri Pradeep AS, Yiu TW, Zou Y, Amor R. 2021. Blockchain-aided information exchange records for design liability control and improved security. Autom Constr. 126:103667. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis M, Ramachandra T, Perera S. 2022. Disputes in construction projects: a perspective of project characteristics. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 14(2):04522007. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin P, Tywoniak S, Sutherland J. 2021. Collaboration and opportunism in megaproject alliance contracts: the interplay between governance, trust and culture. Int J Project Manage. 39(4):394–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Jha KN. 2022. Integration of blockchain with emerging technologies in AEC industry: merits and challenges. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 1101(9):092020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/9/092020.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Jha KN. 2023. A decentralized and automated contracting system using a blockchain-enabled network of stakeholders in construction. J Manage Eng. 39(4):04023021. doi: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamledari H, Fischer M. 2021. Construction payment automation using blockchain-enabled smart contracts and robotic reality capture technologies. Autom Constr. 132:103926. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haron RC, Masrom MAN, Kamal K. 2020. Assessing causes of contractual disputes from different type of condition of contracts. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol. 11(4):45–59. http://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijscet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayford O. 2018. Collaborative contracting. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC). Australia. [Accessed 2022 April 08] https://www.pwc.com.au/legal/assets/collaborative-contracting-mar18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hennings WC, Abdellatif SA, Hanna AS. 2022. Proper risk allocation: force majeure clause. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 14(1):04521048. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illankoon IMCS, Tam VWY, Le KN, Ranadewa KATO. 2022. Causes of disputes, factors affecting dispute resolution and effective alternative dispute resolution for Sri Lankan construction industry. Int J Constr Manag. 22(2):218–228. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1616415.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer KC, Kalidindi SN, Ganesh LS. 2002. Dispute prone contract clauses - a basis for operational flexibility in contract administration. Global J Flex Syst Manag. 3:39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer KC, Satyanarayana KN. 2002. Final and binding power clauses in Indian construction contracts. Int J Project Manage. 20(1):13–22. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00028-4.
   Google Scholar
• Jagannathan P, Nidhi H. 2017. Analysis to identify the prevailing causes that leads to arbitration in construction contracts. Int J Civ Eng Technol. 8(4):2069–2076.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Liu X, Wang Z, Li M, Zhong RY, Huang GQ. 2023. Blockchain-enabled digital twin collaboration platform for fit-out operations in modular integrated construction. Autom Constr. 148:104747. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebede S. 2022. Assessment of causes and settlement mechanisms of construction disputes in public work contracts: an Ethiopian perspective. Arch Civ Eng. 68(1):145–168. doi: 10.24425/ace.2022.140161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawaja EUR, Mustapha A. 2021. Mitigating disputes and managing legal issues in the era of building information modelling. JCDC. 26(1):111–130. doi: 10.21315/jcdc2021.26.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Kim EW, Park MS, Kim K, Kim KJ. 2022. Blockchain-based automatic tracking and extracting construction document for claim and dispute support. KSCE J Civ Eng. 26(9):3707–3724. doi: 10.1007/s12205-022-2181-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee L. 2015. International construction contract law. Oxford: JohnWiley and Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Koc K, Gurgun AP. 2022. Ambiguity factors in construction contracts entailing conflicts. ECAM. 29(5):1946–1964. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2020-0254.
   Google Scholar
• Koulu R. 2016. Blockchains and online dispute resolution: smart contracts as an alternative to enforcement. SCRIPT-ed. 13(1):40–69. doi: 10.2966/scrip.130116.40.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Ham Y, Yi JS, Son J. 2020. Effective risk positioning through automated identification of missing contract conditions from the contractor’s perspective based on FIDIC contract cases. J Manage Eng. 36(3):05020003. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Yi JS, Son J. 2019. Development of automatic-extraction model of poisonous clauses in international construction contracts using rule-based NLP. J Comput Civ Eng. 33(3):04019003. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D, et al. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 62(10):e1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Das M, Wang J, Cheng JCP. 2019. Construction payment automation through smart contract-based blockchain framework. In Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. ISARC 2019. pp. 1254–1260. doi: 10.22260/ISARC2019/0168.
   Google Scholar
• Marques RC. 2018. Is arbitration the right way to settle conflicts in PPP arrangements? J Manage Eng. 34(1):05017007. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason J. 2017. Intelligent contracts and the construction industry. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 9(3):04517012. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews M, Bowe B, Roble D. 2017. BIM + blockchain: a solution to the trust problem in collaboration? In Proc CITA BIM Gathering 2017. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin School of Architecture. doi: 10.21427/D73N5K.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara A, Sepasgozar SME. 2021. Intelligent contract adoption in the construction industry: concept development. Autom Constr. 122:103452. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DB. 2008. Dispute avoidance. A non-confrontational approach to the management of construction contracts. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Naji KK, Mansour MM, Gunduz M. 2020. Methods for modeling and evaluating construction disputes: a critical review. IEEE Access. 8(1):45641–45652. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976109.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto S. 2008. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. [Accessed 2022 May 08] https://nakamotoinstitute.org/static/docs/bitcoin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nawari NO, Ravindran S. 2019. Blockchain and the built environment: potentials and limitations. J. Build. Eng. 25(Sep):100832. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100832.
   Google Scholar
• NDA. 2020. “Construction disputes in India”. Nishith Desai and Associates. [Accessed 2022 November 15] https://www.nishithdesai.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Research_Papers/Construction-disputes-in-india.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ortolani P. 2019. The impact of blockchain technologies and smart contracts on dispute resolution: arbitration and court litigation at the crossroads. Uniform Law Review. 24(2):430–448. doi: 10.1093/ulr/unz017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh D, Joshi GJ, Patel DA. 2019. Development of prediction models for claim cause analyses in highway projects. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 11(4):04519018. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishdad-Bozorgi P, Yoon JH. 2022. Transformational approach to subcontractor selection using blockchain-enabled smart contract as trust-enhancing technology. Autom Constr. 142:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian X (), E, Papadonikolaki. 2020. Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology. ECAM. 28(2):584–602. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-12-2019-0676.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeirinho MJ, Mischke J, Strube G, Sjödin E, Blanco JL, Palter R, Biörck J, Rockhill D, Andersson T. 2020. The next normal in construction. New York: McKinsey & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). 2012. “Conflict avoidance and dispute resolution in construction.” RICS Professional Guidance. Coventry, United Kingdom. Page Bros, Norwich, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Sabri OK, Torp O. 2022. Corrective and preventive action plan (CAPA) for disputes in construction projects: a Norwegian perspective. Infrastructures. 7(5):63. doi: 10.3390/infrastructures7050063.
   Google Scholar
• Salah K, Rehman MHU, Nizamuddin N, Al-Fuqaha A. 2019. Blockchain for AI: review and open research challenges. IEEE Access. 7:10127–10149. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar D, Dhaneshwar D, Raval P. 2023. Automation in monitoring of construction projects through BIM-IoT-Blockchain model. J Inst Eng India Ser A. 104(2):317–333. doi: 10.1007/s40030-023-00727-8.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney A, Riley M, Irizarry J. 2020. Construction 4.0: an innovation platform for the built environment. London: Taylor & Francis (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Saygili M, Mert IE, Tokdemir OB. 2022. A decentralized structure to reduce and resolve construction disputes in a hybrid blockchain network. Autom Constr. 134:104056. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaratne S, Farhan S. 2023. Role of standard contracts in mitigating disputes in construction. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 15(1):04522045. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana O, Gad GM. 2023. Mitigating claims and disputes for public-private-partnership transportation projects in the United States. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 15(3):04523012. doi: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shash AA, Habash SI. 2021. Disputes in construction industry: owners and contractors’ views on causes and remedies. J Eng Project Prod Manag. 11(1):37–51. doi: 10.2478/jeppm-2021-0005.
   Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Rathore S, Park JH. 2020. BlockIoTIntelligence: a blockchain-enabled intelligent IoT architecture with artificial intelligence. Future Gener Comput Syst. 110:721–743. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonmez R, Ahmadisheykhsarmast S, Güngör AA. 2022. BIM integrated smart contract for construction project progress payment administration. Autom Constr. 139:104294. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo N. 1994. Smart contracts. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Turk Ž, Klinc R. 2017. Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. Procedia Eng. 196:638–645. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052.
   Google Scholar
• Ul Hassan F, Le TY, Lv X. 2021. Addressing legal and contractual matters in construction using natural language processing: a critical review. J Constr Eng Manage. 147(9):03121004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan SK, Panwar A, Kar S, Lavingiya R, Jha KN. 2020. Causal modeling of disputes in construction projects. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 12(4):1–11. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab A, Wang J, Shojaei A, Ma J. 2022. A model-based smart contracts system via blockchain technology to reduce delays and conflicts in construction management processes. ECAM. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-03-2022-0271.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhang S, Fenn P, Luo X, Liu Y, Zhao L. 2023. Adopting BIM to facilitate dispute management in the construction industry: a conceptual framework development. J Constr Eng Manage. 149(1):03122010. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhead R, Stephenson P, Morrey D. 2018. Digital construction: From point solutions to IoT ecosystem. Autom Constr. 93(October 2017):35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhong B, Li H, Guo J, Wang Y. 2021. On-site construction quality inspection using blockchain and smart contracts. J Manage Eng. 37(6):04021065. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liu T, Rahman A, Zhou L. 2023. Blockchain applications for construction contract management: a systematic literature review. J Constr Eng Manage. 149(1):03122011. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Chen X, Wang H. 2017. An overview of blockchain technology: architecture, consensus, and future trends. In Proc. 2017 IEEE 6th Int. Congress on Big Data, BigData Congress 2017, 557–564. New York: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85.
   Google Scholar