Genetic structure of wild and domesticated grasscutters (Thryonomys swinderianus) from south-western Nigeria

References

• Adenyo C, Hayano A, Inoue E, Kayang BB, Inoue-Murayama M. 2012. Development of microsatellite markers for grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus, Rodentia) using next-generation sequencing technology. Conservation Genetic Resources 4: 1011–1014. doi: 10.1007/s12686-012-9695-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adenyo C, Hayano A, Kayang BB, Owusu EH, Inoue-Murayama M. 2013. Mitchondrial D-loop diversity of grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus Rodentia: Hystricomorpha) in Ghana. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 3: 145–153. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2013.33022
   Google Scholar
• Adenyo C, Ogden R, Kayang B, Onuma M, Nakajima N, Inoue-Murayama M. 2017. Genome-wide DNA markers to support genetic management for domestication and commercial production in a large rodent, the Ghanaian grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus). Animal Genetics 48: 113–115. doi: 10.1111/age.12478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adu EK. 2002. Research on grasscutter production in Ghana. In: Atta-Agyapong K, Weidinger R (eds), Proceedings of workshop on promoting grasscutter production for poverty reduction in Ghana. Accra: Qualitype Printing and Graphics. pp 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Adu EK, Alhassan WS, Nelson FS. 1999. Smallholder farming of the greater grasscutter, Thryonomys swinderianus, Temminck, in souther Ghana: a baseline survey of management practices. Tropical Animal Health and Production 31: 223–232. doi: 10.1023/A:1005267110830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN. 2013. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Asibey EOA. 1974. Wildlife as a source of protein in Africa south of the Sahara. Biological Conservation 6: 32–39. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(74)90039-1
   Google Scholar
• Asibey EOA, Addo PG. 2000. The grasscutter, a promising animal for meat production. In: Turnham D (ed.), African perspectives: practices and policies supporting sustainable development. Harare: Weaver Press. p 120.
   Google Scholar
• Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N. 2002. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11: 155–165. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptist R, Mensah GA. 1986. Benin and West Africa: grasscutter – farm animal of the future? World Animal Review 60: 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bruford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G. 2003. DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 900–910. doi: 10.1038/nrg1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford JC, Zhiwei L, Nelson TA, Nielson CK, Bloomquist CK. 2009. Genetic population structure within and between beaver (Castor canadensis) populations in Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 90: 373–379. doi: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-146.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JM, Stamps JA. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer DS. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhamer GA, Drickamer LC, Vessey SH, Merritt JF. 1999. Mammalogy. Boston: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher RJ Jr, Robertson EP, Wilcox RC, Reichert BE, Austin JD, Kitchens WM. 2015. Affinity for natal environments by dispersers impacts reproduction and explains geographic structure of a highly mobile bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282: 20152845.
   Google Scholar
• Goudet J. 2002. FSAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices, version 2.9.3.2. Available at www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html [accessed 10 July 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Hanotte O, Mensah GA. 2002. Biodiversity and domestication of ‘’non-conventional’’ species: a worldwide perspective. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 19–23 August 2002, Montpellier, France. Castanet-Tolosan: INRA. pp 543–546.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801–1806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jori F, Mensah GA, Adjanohoun E. 1995. Grasscutter production: an example of rational exploitation of wildlife. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 257–265 doi: 10.1007/BF00055972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirmans PG. 2006. Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 60: 2399–2402. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01874.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills LS. 2013. Conservation of wildlife populations: demography, genetics and management. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Monadjem A, Taylor PJ, Denys C, Cotterill FPD. 2015. Rodents of sub-Saharan Africa. Berlin: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Narum SR. 2006. Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 7: 783–787. doi: 10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakroborty R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1991. Grasscutter. In: Microlivestock: little-known small animals with a promising economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. pp 233–239.
   Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Ruibal M, Lindenmayer DB. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bushrat, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution 57: 1182–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00327.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price EO. 1984. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Quarterly Review of Biology 59: 1–32. doi: 10.1086/413673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population genetic structure using multilocus genotypic data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralls K, Ballou J. 1983. Extinction: lessons from zoos. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL (eds), Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings. pp 164–184.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg NA. 2004. Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 137–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset F. 2004. Genetic structure and selection in subdivided populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryman N, Palm S. 2006. POWSIM: a computer program for assessing statistical power when testing for genetic differentiation. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 600–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks BN, Brown SK, Ernest HB. 2004. Population structure of California coyotes corresponds to habitat-specific breaks and illuminates species history. Molecular Ecology 13: 1265–1275. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02110.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TB, Wayne RK, Girman DJ, Bruford MW. 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276: 1855–1857. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5320.1855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taberlet P, Valentini A, Rezaei HR, Naderi S, Pompanon F, Negrini R, Ajmone-Marsan P. 2008. Are cattle, sheep, and goats endangered species? Molecular Ecology 17: 275–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03475.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Resources 4: 535–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar