The extended religious phenotype and the adaptive coupling of ritual and belief

References

• Alcorta CS, Sosis R. 2005. Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols: The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex. Hum Nat. 16(4):323–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson QD, Whitehouse H. 2011. The cultural morphospace of ritual form: examining modes of religiosity cross-culturally. Evol Hum Behav. 32(1):50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atran S. 1998. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behav Brain Sci. 21(4):547–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atran S. 2002. In gods we trust: the evolutionary landscape of religion. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S. 1995. Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett JL. 2004. Why would anyone believe in God? New York (NY): AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett JL. 2008. Why Santa Claus is not a god. J Cogn Cult. 8(1–2):149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett JL. 2012. Born believers: The science of children's religious belief. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett JL, Keil FC. 1996. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cogn Psychol. 31:219–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bering, J. 2011. The belief instinct: the psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York (NY): W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bering JM, Johnson DDP. 2005. “O Lord… you perceive my thoughts from afar”: recursiveness and the evolution of supernatural agency. J Cogn Cult. 5:118–142.
   Google Scholar
• Binford L. 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. Am Antiquity. 28(2):217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird RB, Smith EA. 2005. Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Curr Anthropol. 46(2): 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume M. 2009. The reproductive benefits of religious affiliation. In: Voland E, Schiefenhövel W, editors. The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. New York (NY): Springer; 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Blume M. 2010. Von Hayek and the Amish fertility: how religious communities manage to be fruitful and multiply. A case study. In: Frey U, editor, The nature of god: evolution and religion. Marburg: Tectum Verlag; p. 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Borgia G. 1995a. Complex male display and female choice in the spotted bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations. Anim Behav. 49:1291–1301.
   Google Scholar
• Borgia G. 1995b. Threat reduction as a cause of differences in bower architecture: bower decoration and male display in two closely-related bowerbirds Chlamydera nuchalis and C. maculata. Emu 95(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard Jr. TJ 2004. Genetic influence on human psychological traits: a survey. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 13:148–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard Jr. TJ, McGue M. 2003. Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J Neurobiol. 54(1):4–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyer P. 2001. Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer P. 2002. Why do gods and spirits matter at all? In: Pyysiäinen I, Veikko A, editors. Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion. New York (NY): Continuum; p. 68–92.
   Google Scholar
• Brown D. 1991. Human universals. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bulbulia J. 2008. Meme infection or religious niche construction?: an adaptationist alternative to the cultural maladaptationist hypothesis. Method Theory Study Rel. 20:67–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia J. 2012. Spreading order: religion, cooperative niche construction, and risky coordination problems. Biol Philos. 27(1):1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia J, Sosis R. 2011. Signaling theory and the evolution of religions. Religion 41(3):363–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia J., Sosis R, Harris E, Genet R, Genet C, Wyman K, editors. 2008. The evolution of religion: studies, theories, and critiques. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosmides L, Tooby J. 2000. Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, editors. Handbook of emotions. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Guilford Press; p. 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Cronk L. 1994. Evolutionary theories of morality and the manipulative use of signals. Zygon 29(1):81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronk L. 2005. The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: some thoughts and clarifications. Soc Sci Inf. 44(4):603–620.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins R. 1982. The extended phenotype: the long reach of the gene. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins R. 2004. Extended phenotype – But not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biol Philos. 19:377–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins R. 2006. The god delusion. New York (NY): Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins R, Krebs JR. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc Royal Soc Lond B. Biol Sci. 205(1161):489–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. 1987. Bower building and decoration by the bowerbird Amblyornis inornatus. Ethology 74:177–204.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. 1915/2001. The elementary forms of religious life. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Fishawy P, State MW. 2010. The genetics of autism: key issues, recent findings and clinical implications. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 33(1):83–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feierman JR, editor. 2009. The biology of religious behavior: the evolutionary origins of faith and religion. Santa Barbara (CA): Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher CL, Thornhill R. 2012. Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: the cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behav Brain Sci. 35(2):61–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka T, Westoff CF. 2008. Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. Eur J Popul. 24:5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher HL, Frith CD. 2003. Functional imaging of “theory of mind.” Trends Cogn Sci. 7(2):77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole SE. 1997. Models of verbal short-term memory. In: Conway MA., editor. Cognitive models of memory. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; p. 13–44.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie SE. 1980. A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropol. 21(2):181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie SE. 1995. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser MD. 1996. The evolution of communication. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter P. 2009. Extended phenotype redux. Eur Mol Biol Org. 10(3):212–215.
   Google Scholar
• Iannaccone LR. 1992. Sacrifice and stigma: reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives. J Political Econ. 100(2):271–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannaccone LR. 1995. Voodoo economics? Reviewing the rational choice approach to religion. J Sci Study Rel. 34(1):76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonka E. 2004. From replicators to heritably varying phenotypic traits: the extended phenotype revisited. Biol Philos. 19(3):353–375.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DDP. 2005. God's punishment and public goods: a test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Hum Nat. 16:410–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. 2003. Material culture and sacred landscape: The anthropology of the Siberian Khanty. Walnut Creek (CA): Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kantner J, Vaughn KJ. 2012. Pilgrimage as costly signal: religiously motivated cooperation in Chaco and Nasca. J Anthropol Archaeol. 31(1):66–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapogiannis D, Barbey AK, Su M, Krueger F, Grafman J. 2009. Neuroanatomical variability of religiosity. PLoS ONE 4(9).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaufmann, E. 2010. Shall the religion inherit the earth? London: Profile Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig LB, Bouchard Jr, TJ. 2006. Genetic and environmental influences on the Travidional Moral Values Triad – Authoritarianism, conservativism and religiousness – as assessed by quantitative behavior genetic methods. In: McNamara P., editor, Where god and science meet: how brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion. 1st vol. Westport (CA): Praeger; p. 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kydd D. 2008. Supernatural niche construction incubates brilliance and governs the ratchet effect. In: Bulbulia J, Sosis R, Harris E, Genet R and Genet C, editors. The evolution of religion: studies, theories, critiques. Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press; p. 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lahti DC. 2009. The correlated history of social organization, morality, and religion. In: Voland E, Schiefenhövel W, editors. The evolution of religious mind and behavior. New York (NY): Springer; p. 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Laland KN. 2004. Extending the extended phenotype. Biol Phil. 19(3):313–325.
   Google Scholar
• Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Feldman MW. 2000. Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behav Brain Sci. 23:131–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loffredo CA, Borgia G. 1986. Sexual selection, mating systems, and the evolution of avian acoustical displays. Am Nat. 128(6):773–794.
   Google Scholar
• Malley BE. 1995. Explaining order in religious systems. Method Theory Study Rel. 7(2):5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Malley BE. 1997. Causal holism in the evolution of religious ideas. Method Theory Study Rel. 9(4):389–399.
   Google Scholar
• Moran JM, Young LL, Saxe R, Lee SM, O'Young D, Mavros PL, Gabrieli JD. 2011. Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 108(7):2688–2692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan A, Shariff AF. 2008. The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322:58–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan A, Gervais WM, Trzesniewski KH. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS ONE 7(5).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odling-Smee FJ. 1996. Niche construction, genetic evolution and cultural change. Behav Processes. 35:195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Otte D. 1974. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 5(1):385–417.
   Google Scholar
• Peoples HC, Marlowe FW. 2012. Subsistence and the evolution of religion. Hum Nat. 23(3):253–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker S. 2002. The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. New York (NY): Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker S. 2012. The false allure of group selection. Edge [Internet]. Available from: http://edge.org/conversation/the-false-allure-of-group-selection.
   Google Scholar
• Premack DG, Woodruff G. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci. 1:515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG. 2011. Tyvan cher eezi and the socioecological constraints of supernatural agents’ minds. Religion, Brain, Behav. 1(1):31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG. 2012. Finding minds in the natural world: Dynamics of the religious system in the Tyva Republic [dissertation]. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG. 2013. The minds of gods: A comparative study of supernatural agency. Cognition 129(1):163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG, Arakchaa T. 2013. Ritual behavior and trust in the Tyva Republic. Curr Anthropol. 54(3):381–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG, Sosis R. 2009. The religious system as adaptive: cognitive flexibility, public displays, and acceptance. In: Voland E, Schiefenhövel W, editors. The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; p. 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG, Sosis R. 2010. Religious concepts as necessary components of the adaptive religious system. In Frey U, editor. The nature of god: evolution and religion. Marburg: Tectum Verlag; p. 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG, Finkel DN, Shaver J, Wales N, Cohen AB, Sosis R. 2012. What does god know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and nonstrategic information. Cogn Sci. 36(5):846–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purzycki BG, Sosis R, Haque O. In press. Extending evolutionary accounts of religion beyond the mind: religions as adaptive systems. In: Watts F, Turner L, editors. The evolution of religion: critical perspectives and new directions.
   Google Scholar
• Pyysiäinen I, Hauser M. 2010. The origins of religion: evolved adaptation or by-product? Trends Cogn Sci. 14(3):104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport RA. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley M. 2004. The agile gene: how nature turns on nurture. New York (NY): Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Roes FL, Raymond M. 2003. Belief in moralizing gods. Evol Human Behav. 24:126–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffle BJ, Sosis R. 2007. Does it pay to pray? Costly ritual and cooperation. BE J Econ Anal Policy 7:1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffle BJ, Sosis R. n.d. Do religious contexts elicit more trust and altruism? An experiment on facebook [Internet]. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1566123.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson SK. 2008. Religious attachment theory and the biosocial evolution of the major world religions. In: Bulbulia J, Sosis R, Harris E, Genet R, Genet C, editors. The evolution of religion: studies, theories, critiques. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation; p. 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Schloss JP, Murray MJ. 2011. Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: a critical review. Religion, Brain Behav. 1(1): 46.
   Google Scholar
• Searcy WA, Nowicki S. 2005. The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton (CA): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shariff AF, Norenzayan A. 2007. God is watching you: priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychol Sci. 18: 803–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder RA, Mahapatra M, Miller JG. 1987. Culture and moral development. In: Kagan J, Lamb S, editors. The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Shweder RA, Much NC, Mahapatra M, Park L. 1997. The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In: Brandt AM, editor. Morality and Health. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 119–169.
   Google Scholar
• Sierksma F. 1963. Sacred cairns in pastoral cultures. History Religion. 2(2):227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Soler M. 2012. Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion. Evol Hum Behav. 33(4):346–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis R. 2005. Does religion promote trust? The role of signaling, reputation, and punishment. Interdiscip J Res Religion. 1:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sosis R. 2009. The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. J Cogn Cult. 9:339–356.
   Google Scholar
• Sosis R, Bressler ER. 2003. Cooperation and commune longevity: a test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cult Res. 37(2):211–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis R, Ruffle B. 2003. Religious ritual and cooperation: testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Curr Anthropol 44:713–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis R, Ruffle B. 2004. Ideology, religion, and the evolution of cooperation: Field tests on Israeli kibbutzim. Res Econ Anthropol. 23:89–117.
   Google Scholar
• Sosis R, Kress HC, Boster JS. 2007. Scars for war: evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross cultural variance in ritual costs. Evol Hum Behav. 28:234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark R. 2001. Gods, rituals, and the moral order. J Sci Study Religion. 40(4):619–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson GE. 1960. The birth of the gods: the origin of primitive beliefs. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen J. 2004. Religion, evolution, and an immunology of cultural systems. Evol Cogn. 10(1):61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tan JHW, Vogel C. 2008. Religion and trust: an experimental study. J Econ Psychol 29(6):832–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby J, Cosmides L. 1992. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J, editors. The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; p. 163–228.
   Google Scholar
• Tooby J, DeVore I. 1987. The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In: Kinzey W, editor. Primate models of hominid behavior. New York (NY): SUNY Press; p. 183–237.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JS. 2000. The extended organism: the physiology of animal-built structures. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JS. 2004. Extended phenotypes and extended organisms. Biol Philos. 19(3):327–352.
   Google Scholar
• Vivanti G, McCormick C, Young GS, Abucayan F, Hatt N, Nadig A, Ozonoff S, Rogers SJ. 2011. Intact and impaired mechanisms of action understanding in autism. Dev Psychol. 47(3):841–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voland E, Schiefenhövel W. 2009. The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace AFC. 1956. Revitalization movements. American Anthropologist 58(2):264–281.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe H. 1972. The Ainu. In Bicchieri MG, editor. Hunters and gatherers today: a socioeconomic study of eleven such cultures in the twentieth century. Prospect Heights (NY): Waveland Press; p. 448–484.
   Google Scholar
• White L. 1952. The evolution of culture. New York (NY): McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson DS. 2002. Darwin's cathedral: evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago (IL): University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi A, Zahavi A. 1997. The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zilbovicius M, Meresse I, Chabane N, Brunelle F, Samson Y, Boddaert N. 2006. Autism, the superior temporal sulcus and social perception. Trends Neurosci. 29(7):359–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar