Habitat selection reveals state-dependent foraging trade-offs in a temporally autocorrelated environment

References

• Auclerc A, Libourel PA, Salmon S, Bels V, Ponge JF. 2010. Assessment of movement patterns in Folsomia candida (Hexapoda: Collembola) in the presence of food. Soil Biol Biochem. 42:657–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley M, Holmstrup M. 1999. Water vapor absorption in arthropods by accumulation of myoinositol and glucose. Science. 285:1909–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD. 2011. A reassessment of the risk allocation hypothesis: a comment on Lima and Bednekoff. Am Nat. 177:143–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednekoff PA, Lima SL. 2011. Risk allocation is a general phenomenon: a reply to Beauchamp and Ruxton. Am Nat. 177:147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Kotler BP, Mitchell WA. 1997. Competition between birds and mammals: a comparison of giving-up densities between crested larks and gerbils. Evol Ecol. 11:757–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Laundré JW, Gurung M. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal. 80:385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouau Y, Cazes L. 2003. What causes variability in the Folsomia candida reproduction test? Appl Soil Ecol. 22:175–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edney EB. 1977. Water balance in land arthropods. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Embar K, Raveh A, Hoffman I, Kotler BP. 2014. Predator facilitation or interference: a game of vipers and owls. Oecologia. 174:1301–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Canada. 2007. Test for measuring survival and reproduction of springtails exposed to contaminants in soil. ( Environ Canada Report EPS 1/RM/47); [ accessed 2013 Sept 10]. Available at: www.ec.gc.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari MC, Sih A, Chivers DP. 2009. The paradox of risk allocation: review and prospectus. Anim Behav. 78:579–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain MT, Hopkin SP. 2001. Continuous monitoring of Folsomia candida (Insecta: Collembola) in a metal exposure test. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 48:275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain MT, Hopkin SP. 2005. Folsomia candida (Collembola): a “standard” soil arthropod. Annu Rev Entomol. 50:201–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox GL, Coyle-Thompson CA, Bellinger PF, Cohen RW. 2007. Phototactic responses to ultraviolet and white light in various species of Collembola, including the eyeless species, Folsomia candida. J Insect Sci. 7:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson AD, Fawcett TW, Trimmer PC, McNamara JM, Houston AI. 2012. Generalized optimal risk allocation: foraging and antipredator behavior in a fluctuating environment. Am Nat. 180:589–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin SP. 1997. Biology of the springtails: (Insecta: Collembola). New York (NY): Oxford University Press; p. 90–111.
   Google Scholar
• Hilligsøe H, Holmstrup M. 2003. Effects of starvation and body mass on drought tolerance in the soil collembolan Folsomia candida. J Insect Physiol. 49:99–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 1999. Soil quality-inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. ( ISO 11267: 1-16). Geneva: International Standardization Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Knight TW, Morris DW, Haedrich RL. 2008. Inferring competitive behavior from population census and habitat data. Isr J Ecol Evol. 45:345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto E, Pusenius J. 2003. Effects of temporal variation in the risk of predation by least weasel (Mustela nivalis) on feeding behavior of field vole (Microtus agrestis). Evol Ecol. 17:477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown J, Muhkerjee S, Berger-Tal O, Bouskila A. 2010. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging. Proc R Soc B. 277:1469–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Morris DW, Brown JS. 2007. Behavioural indicators and conservation: wielding “The Biologist's Tricorder.” Isr J Ecol Evol. 53:237–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogh PH. 2009. Toxicity testing with the collembolans Folsomia fimeteria and Folsomia candida and the results of a ring test. Miljostyrelsen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Lima SL, Bednekoff PA. 1999. Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am Nat. 153:649–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig D, Rowe L. 1990. Life history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints. Am Nat. 135:696–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DW. 2001. Learning from the games animals play: using behavior to assess spatial structure and stochasticity in natural populations. Ann Zool Fennici. 38:37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DW, Davidson DL. 2000. Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology 81:2061–2066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson O, Brown JS, Smith HG. 2002. Long-and short-term state-dependent foraging under predation risk: an indication of habitat quality. Anim Behav. 63:981–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2009. Test No. 232: collembolan reproduction test in soil, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, Section 2. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264076273-en.
   Google Scholar
• Sih A, McCarthy TM. 2002. Prey responses to pulses of risk and safety: testing the risk-allocation hypothesis. Anim Behav. 63:36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Ziemba R, Harding KC. 2000. New insights on how temporal variation in predation risk shapes prey behavior. Trends Ecol Evol. 15:3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staempfli C, Tarradellas J, Becker-van Slooten K. 2007. Effects of dinoseb on energy reserves in the soil arthropod Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 68:263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam EM, van de Leemkule MA, Ernsting G. 1996. Trade-offs in the life history and energy budget of the parthenogenetic collembolan Folsomia candida (Willem). Oecologia. 107:283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell J, Dudek D, Klemme I, Koivisto E, Pusenius J, Ylönen H. 2004. Variation in predation risk and vole feeding behaviour: a field test of the risk allocation hypothesis. Oecologia. 139:157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully T, Ferrière R. 2008. Reproductive flexibility: genetic variation, genetic costs and long-term evolution in a Collembola. PloS One. 3:e3207.
   Google Scholar