Risk of inbreeding: problem of mate choice and fitness effects?

References

• Aars J, Ims RA. 2002. Intrinsic and climatic determinants of population demography: the winter dynamics of tundra voles. Ecology. 83:3449–3456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujalska G. 1973. The role of spacing behaviour among females in the regulation of reproduction in the bank vole. J Reprod Fert 19:465–474.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley MJ. 2007. The R book. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Crnokrak P, Roff DA. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity. 83:260–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MB, Shaw RG. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science. 292:673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DelBarco-Trillo J, Ferkin MH. 2007. Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, experience a reduction in copulatory behavior during postpartum estrus. Ethology. 113:466–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson FS, Chesser K, Hoogland JL, Sugg DW, Foltz DW. 1997. Do black-tailed prairie dogs minimize inbreeding? Evolution. 51:970–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson FS, Jones WT. 1985. Multiple causes of dispersal. Am Nat. 126:855–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferkin MH, Rutka TF. 1989. Mechanisms of sibling recognition in meadow voles. Can J Zool. 68:609–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach G, Musolf K. 2000. Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conserv Biol. 14:1066–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling LM, Roberts SC. 2001. Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv Stud Behav. 30:169–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH. 1982. The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 13:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gros A, Poethke HJ, Hoevestadt T. 2009. Sex-specific spatio-temporal variability in reproductive success promotes the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Theor Popul Biol. 76:13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I, Henttonen H. 1996. Predation on competing rodent species: a simple explanation of complex patterns. J Anim Ecol. 65:220–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestbeck JB. 1982. Population regulation of cyclic mammals: the social fence hypothesis. Oikos. 39:157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne TJ, Ylönen H. 1996. Female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) prefer dominant males; but what if there is no choice? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:401–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne TJ, Ylönen H. 1998. Heritabilities of dominance-related traits in male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evolution. 52:894–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez JA, Hughes KA, Alaks G, Graham L, Lacy RC. 1994. An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science. 266:271–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller LF, Arcese P. 1998. No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a natural population on song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Am Nat. 152:380–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemme I, Eccard JA, Ylönen H. 2006. Why do female bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus, mate multiply? Anim Behav. 73:623–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemme I, Kataja-Aho S, Eccard JA, Ylönen H. 2012. Variable mode of estrus affects female decision for multiple mating. Behav Ecol. 23:361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs CJ. 2013. Population fluctuations in rodents. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 306 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kruczek M. 2006. Recognition of kin in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Physiol Behav. 90:483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin X. 1994. Natal philopatry, competition for resources, and inbreeding avoidance in Townsend´s voles (Microtus townsendii). Ecology. 75:224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo MJ, Johnston RE. 2000. Kin recognition and the “armpit effect”: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc R Soc Lond B. 267:695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R. 2006. Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv. 133:42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn D, Potts W. 1998. How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences? Adv Immunol. 69:411–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. 2010. The R Core team (2009) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-96. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Pokki J. 1982. Distribution, demography and dispersal of field vole, Microtus agrestis (L.), in the Tvärminne archipelago, Finland. Acta Zool Fenn. 164:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pusey A, Wolf M. 1996. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2010: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rikalainen K. 2013. Genetic diversity in the wild – cyclic population dynamics and population isolation [PhD thesis]. Vol. 258. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä Studies in Biological and Environmental Science.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenfeld FM, Rasmont R. 1991. Odor cue recognition by dominant male bank voles, Clethrionomus glareolus. Anim Behav. 41:838–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillero-Zubiri C, Gottelli D, Macdonald DW. 1996. Male philopatry, extra-pack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethiopian volves (Canis simensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JO. 1992. Parents suppress reproduction and stimulate dispersal in opposite-sex juvenile white-footed mice. Nature. 359:409–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JO, Plissner JH. 1998. Sex biases in avian natal dispersal: an extension of the mammalian model. Oikos. 83:327–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitala J, Hakkarainen H, Ylönen H. 1994. Different dispersal in Clethrionomys and Microtus. Ann Zool Fenn. 31:411–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue Y, Prado-Martinez J, Sudmant P, Narasimhan V, Ayub Q, Szpak M, Frandsen P, Chen Y, Yngvadottir B, Cooper DN, et al. 2015. Mountain gorilla genomes reveal the impact of long-term population decline and inbreeding. Science. 348:242–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen H, Kojola T, Viitala J. 1988. Changing female spacing behaviour and demography in an enclosed breeding population of Clethrionomys glareolus. Holarctic Ecol. 11:286–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen H, Pusenius J, Viitala J. 1995. Impact of kinship and familiarity on the annual social organization and population dynamics of Clethrionomys and Microtus voles. Ann Zool Fenn. 32:225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen H, Viitala J. 1987. Social organization and habitat use of introduced populations of the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus (Sund) in Central Finland. Z Säugetierkd. 52:354–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen H, Wolff JO. 1999. Experiments in the behavioural ecology and the real world. Trends Ecol Evol. 14:82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar