Intercontinental-wide consequences of compromise-breaking adaptations: the case of desert rodents

References

• Abramsky Z, Brand S, Rosenzweig ML. 1985. Geographical ecology of gerbilline rodents in sand dune habitats of Israel. J Biogeogr. 12:363–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML. 1984. Tilman predicted productivity diversity relationship shown by desert rodents. Nature. 309:150–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour MG, Diaz DV. 1973. Larrea plant communities on bajada and moisture gradients in the United States and Argentina. Vegetation. 5:335–351.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Natan G, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP. 2004. Daily renewal of seed resource patches provide the necessary environmental variability for two temporally partitioning gerbils. Oikos. 105:325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger-Tal O, Kotler BP, Mukherjee S, Brown JS. 2010. Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils. Ecol Lett. 13:302–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleicher SS, Brown JS, Embar K, Kotler BP. Novel predator recognition by Allenby's gerbil (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi): do gerbils learn to respond to a snake that can “see” in the dark? Manuscript d.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher SS, Kotler BP, Down CJ, Brown JS. Cross-continental common garden experiments exposing desert rodents to vipers: I. Evasion strategies of kangaroo rats from the Mojave and gerbils from the Negev Deserts. Manuscript b.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher SS, Kotler BP, Downs CJ, Brown JS. Cross-continental common garden experiments exposing desert rodents to evolutionarily novel and known vipers: II. Heteromyid rodents play their evolutionary strengths and provide examples of opposite snake evasion strategies. Manuscript c.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher SS, Kotler BP, Shalev O, Dixon A, Brown JS. Convergent desert rodents diverge on viper evasion strategies. Manuscript a.
   Google Scholar
• Bouskila A. 1995. Interactions between predation risk and competition: a field study of kangaroo rats and snakes. Ecology. 76:165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH. 1975. Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Cody ML and Diamond JM, editors. Ecology and evolution of communities. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JH. 1995. Macroecology. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Fox BJ, Kelt DA. 2000. Assembly rules: desert rodent communities are structured at scales from local to continental. Am Nat. 156:314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Gibson AC. 1983. Biogeography. St. Louis (MO): Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. 2004. Towards a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology. 87:1771–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Harney, BA. 1993. Population and community ecology of heteromyid rodents in temperate habitats. In: Genowayts HH, Brown JH, editors. Biology of Heteromyidae. Special Publication. Vol. 10. Provo (UT): American Society of Mammalogists; p. 618–651.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Lieberman GA. 1973. Resource utilization and coexistence of seed-eating desert rodents in sand dune habitats. Ecology. 54:788–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS. 1989. Desert rodent community structure: a test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol Monogr. 59:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Kotler BP, Porter W. How foraging allometries and resource dynamics explain Bergmann's Rule and the body-size diet relationship in mammals. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Kotler BP, Smith RJ, Wirtz WO II. 1988. The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia. 76:408–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Kotler BP, Valone TJ. 1994. Foraging under predation: a comparison of energetic and predation costs in a Negev and Sonoran desert rodent community. Aust J Zool. 42:435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M. 1999. The ecology of fear: Optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal. 80:385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Calder WA III. 1984. Size, function and life history. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charnov EL. 1976. Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 9:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 31:343–366.
   Google Scholar
• Chevret P, Dobigny G. 2005. Systematics and evolution of the subfamily Gerbillinae (Mammalia, Rodentia, Muridae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 35:674–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DC. 2010. Big Ecology: the emergence of ecosystem science. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper JP. 1975. Photosynthesis and productivity in different environments. International Biological Programme Synthesis Series. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Embar K, Kotler BP, Mukherjee S, Brown JS. 2011. Risk management in optimal foragers: the effect of sightlines and predators on patch use, time allocation, vigilance, and apprehension in gerbils. Oikos. 120:1657–1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooley FB, Petrusewicz K, Ryszowski L. 1975. Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. International Biological Programme Synthesis Series. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant PR. 1972. Convergent and divergent character displacement. Biol J Linnean Soc. 4:39–68.
   Google Scholar
• Grant PR, Grant BR, Market JA, Keller LF, Petren K. 2004. Convergent evolution of Darwin's finches caused by introgressive hybridization and selection. Evolution. 58:1588–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner JC, Light JE, Hafner DJ, Hafner MS, Reddington E, Rogers DS, Riddle, BR. 2007. Basal clades and molecular systematic of heteromyid rodents. J Mammal. 88:1129–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugie DM, Dill LM. 1994. Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. J Fish Biol. 45:151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr JR, James FC. 1975. Ecomorphological configurations and convergent evolution. In: Cody ML and Diamond JM, editors. Ecology and evolution of communities. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press; p. 258–291.
   Google Scholar
• Kelt DA, Brown JH, Heske EJ, Marquet PA, Morton SR, Reid JRW, Rogovin KA, Shenbrot G. 1996. Community structure of desert small mammals: comparisons across four deserts. Ecology. 77:746–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, 1984. Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology. 65:689–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Blaustein L, Brown JS. 1992. Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Ann Zool Fennici. 29:199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Blaustein L, Dednam H. 1993b. The specter of predation: the effect of vipers on the foraging behavior of two species of gerbils. Isr J Zool. 39:11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS. 1988. Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 19:281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS. 1990. Rates of seed harvest by two species of gerbilline rodents. J Mammal. 71:591–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Dall SRX, Gresser S, Ganey D, Bouskila A. 2002. Foraging games between owls and gerbils: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol Ecol Res. 4:495–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O. 1991. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology. 72:2249–2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Mukherjee S, Berger-Tal O, Bouskila A. 2010. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance, and state-dependent foraging. Proc R Soc Lond B. 277:1469–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Slotow R, Goodfriend W, Strauss M. 1993c. The influence of snakes on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Oikos. 67:309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Smith RJ, Wirtz WO II. 1988. The effects of morphology and body size on the costs of predation in desert rodents. Oikos. 53:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Subach A. 1993a. Mechanisms of coexistence of optimal foragers: temporal partitioning in two species of sand dune dwelling gerbils. Oikos. 67:548–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen E. 1986. Competitive release in microhabitat use among coexisting desert rodents: a natural experiment. Oecologia. 69:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SL. 1988. Vigilance during the initiation of feeding in dark-eyed juncos. Oikos 53:12--16.
   Google Scholar
• Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Brown JH. 2006. Biogeography. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longland WS, Price MV. 1991. Direct observations of owls and heteromyid rodents: can predation risk explain microhabitat use? Ecology. 72:2261–2273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH. 1972. Geographical ecology. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mares MA. 1975. South American mammal zoogeography: evidence for convergent evolution in desert rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 72:1702–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mares MA. 1980. Convergent evolution among desert rodents: a global perspective. Bull. Carnegie Mus Nat Hist. 16:1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mares MA. 1983. Desert rodent adaptation and community structure. Great Basin Nat Mem. 7:30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mares MA. 1993. Desert rodents, seed consumption, and convergence. Bioscience. 43:372–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee GR. 2011. Convergent evolution: limited forms most beautiful. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton SR, Hinds DS, MacMillen RE. 1980. Cheek pouch capacity in heteromyid rodents. Oecologia. 46:143–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovadia O, Ziv Y, Abramsky Z, Pinshow B, Kotler BP. 2001. Harvest rates and foraging strategies in Negev Desert gerbils. Behav Ecol. 12:219–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RH. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pianka ER. 1975. Niche relations of desert lizards. In: Cody ML and Diamond JM, editors. Ecology and evolution of communities. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price MV. 1978. Role of microhabitat in structuring desert rodent communities. Ecology. 59:910–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. 1973. Habitat selection experiments with a pair of coexisting heteromyid rodent species. Ecology. 54:111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Species diversity in time and space. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML, Abramsky Z. 1997. Two gerbils of the Negev: a long-term investigation of optimal habitat selection and its consequences. Evol Ecol. 11:733–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML, McCord RD. 1991. Incumbent replacement: evidence for long-term evolutionary progress. Paleobiology. 17:202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A. 1980. Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands. Science. 210:1041–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A. 1998. Game theory and predator–prey response races. In: Dugatkin LA and Reeve HK, editors. Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC. 2007. Foraging: An overview. In: Stephens DW, Brown JS, and Ydenberg RC, editors. Foraging: behavior and ecology. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens DW, Krebs JR. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steppan SJ, Addkins RM, Anderson J. 2004. Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. Syst Biol. 53:533–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchin P. 2001. Does population ecology have general laws? Oikos. 94:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserberg G, Kotler BP, Abramsky Z. 2006. The role of site, habitat, seasonality, competition, and resource dynamics in determining the nightly activity patterns of psammophilic gerbils in a centrifugally organized community. Oikos. 112:573–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserberg G, Kotler BP, Morris DW, Abramsky Z. 2007. A field-test of the centrifugal community organization model in a community of psammophilic gerbils in the southern coastal plain, Israel. Evol Ecol Res. 9:299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserberg G, Kotler BP, Valdivia N, Abramsky Z. 2005. The role of vegetation characteristics and foraging substrate in organizing a centrifugal gerbil community. J Mammal. 86:1009–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster BD. 1962. A function of the enlarged middle-ear cavities of the kangaroo rat, Dipodomys. Physiol Zool. 35:248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Webster DB, Strother DB. 1972. Middle-ear morphology and auditory sensitivity in heteromyid rodents. Am Zool. 12:727.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington EB. 2009. The evolution of IBP. International Biological Programme Synthesis Series. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv Y, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP, Subach A. 1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos. 66:237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv Y, Kotler BP, Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Foraging efficiencies of competing rodents: why do gerbils exhibit shared-preference habitat selection? Oikos. 73:260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar