116
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Novel predator recognition by Allenby's gerbil (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi): do gerbils learn to respond to a snake that can “see” in the dark?

, , &
Pages 178-185 | Received 04 Nov 2015, Accepted 05 Apr 2016, Published online: 13 May 2016

References

  • Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML. 1984. Tilman's predicted productivity – diversity relationship shown by desert rodents. Nature. 309:150–151.
  • Amo L, López P, Martín J, Annales S, Fennici Z, Arno L, Lopez P, Martin J. 2004. Multiple predators and conflicting refuge use in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Ann Zool Fenn. 41:671–679.
  • Banks PB, Bytheway JP, Carthey AJR, Hughes NK, Price CJ. 2014. Olfaction and predator–prey interactions amongst mammals in Australia. In: Glen AS, Dickman CR, editors. Predators in Australia. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing. Chapter 17.
  • Banks PB, Dickman CR. 2007. Alien predation and the effects on multiple levels of prey naivete. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:229–230.
  • Bleicher SS. 2014. Divergent behaviour amid convergent evolution: common garden experiments with desert rodents and vipers. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.
  • Bouskila A. 1995. Interactions between predation risk and competition : a field study of kangaroo rats and snakes. Ecology. 76:165–178.
  • Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37–47.
  • Carthey AJR, Banks PB. 2012. When does an alien become a native species? A vulnerable native mammal recognizes and responds to its long-term alien predator. PLoS ONE. 7:1–4.
  • Carthey AJR, Banks PB. 2014. Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence. Biol Rev Camb Phil Soc. 89:932–949.
  • Cox JG, Lima SL. 2006. Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol. 21:674–80.
  • Crumrine PW. 2010. Size-structured cannibalism between top predators promotes the survival of intermediate predators in an intraguild predation system. J N Am Benthol Soc. 29:636–646.
  • Doherty TS, Davis RA, Van Etten EJB, Algar D, Collier N, Dickman CR, Edwards G, Masters P, Robinson S. 2015. A continental-scale analysis of feral cat diet in Australia. J Biogeogr. 42:964–975.
  • Embar K, Raveh A, Hoffmann I, Kotler BP. 2014. Predator facilitation or interference: a game of vipers and owls. Oecologia. 174:1301–1309.
  • Francis RA. 2011. A handbook of global freshwater invasive species. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard : test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology. 68:1856–1862.
  • Gozlan RE, Britton JR, Cowx I, Copp GH. 2010. Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. J Fish Biol. 76:751–786.
  • Heavener SJ, Carthey AJR, Banks PB. 2014. Competitive naïveté between a highly successful invader and a functionally similar native species. Oecologia. 175:73–84.
  • Karl BJ, Best HA. 1982. Feral cats on Stewart Island – their foods, and their effects on kakapo. J Zool. 9:287–293.
  • Khokhlova IS, Spinu M, Krasnov BR, Degen AA. 2004. Immune responses to fleas in two rodent species differing in natural prevalence of infestation and diversity of flea assemblages. Parasitol Res. 94:304–311.
  • Kotler BP, Blaustein L, Brown JS. 1992. Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Ann Zool Fenn. 29:199–206.
  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Slotow RH, Goodfriend WL, Strauss M. 1993. The influence of snakes on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Oikos. 67:309–316.
  • Letnic M, Greenville A, Denny E, Dickman CR, Tischler M, Gordon C, Koch F. 2011. Does a top predator suppress the abundance of an invasive mesopredator at a continental scale? Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 20:343–353.
  • Parsons MH, Lamont BB, Kovacs BR, Davies SJJF. 2005. Effects of novel and historic predator urines on semi-wild western grey kangaroos. J Wildl Manage. 71:1225–1228.
  • Pintor LM, Brown JS, Vincent TL. 2011. Evolutionary game theory as a framework for studying biological invasions. Am Nat. 177:410–423.
  • Randall J, Boltas King D. 2001. Assessment and defence of solitary kangaroo rats under risk of predation by snakes. Anim Behav. 61:579–587.
  • Rosenzweig ML, McCord RD. 1991. Incumbent replacement: evidence for long-term evolutionary progress. Paleobiology. 17:202–213.
  • Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Pintor LM, Preisser E, Rehage JS, Vonesh JR. 2010. Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos. 119:610–621.
  • Spencer EE, Crowther MS, Dickman CR. 2014. Risky business: do native rodents use habitat and odor cues to manage predation risk in Australian deserts? PLoS ONE. 1–9.
  • Veitch C, Clout M. 2002. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. Gland: IUCN.
  • Vincent TL, Brown JS. 2005. Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and Darwinian dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.