Predators risk injury too: the evolution of derring-do in a predator–prey foraging game

References

• Abrams PA. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 31:79–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ale SB, Brown JS. 2007. The contingencies of group size and vigilance. Evol Ecol Res. 9:1263–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker RT. 1983. The deer flees, the wolf pursues: incongruencies in predator-prey coevolution. In: Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M, editors. Coevolution. Southerland (MD): Sinauer; p. 350–382.
   Google Scholar
• Berger-Tal O, Mukherjee S, Kotler BP, Brown JS. 2009. Look before you leap: Is risk of injury a foraging cost? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 63:1821–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger-Tal O, Polak T, Oron A, Lubin Y, Kotler BP, Saltz D. 2011. Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework. Behav Ecol. 22:236–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouskila A. 2001. A habitat selection game of interactions between rodents and their predators Ann Zool Fenn. 38:55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie ED, Ridenhour BJ, Brodie ED. 2002. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution. 56:2067–2082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Kotler BP. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Letters. 7:999–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, JS, Kotler BP, Bouskila A. 2001. Ecology of fear: foraging games between predators and prey with pulsed resources. Ann Zool Fenn. 38:71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung, M. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal. 80:385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS. 1998. Game theory and habitat selection In: Dugatkin LA, Reeve HK, editors. Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 188–220.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, JS. 1999. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res. 1:49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS. 2010. Ecology of fear. . In: Breed MD, Moore J, editors. Encyclopedia of animal behavior. Oxford: Academic Press; p 581–587.
   Google Scholar
• Charnov EL, Orians GH, Hyatt K. 1976. Ecological implications of resource depression. Am Nat. 110:247–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel MJ. 1960. Porcupine quills in viscera of fisher. J Mammal. 41:133–133.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport J, Spikes M, Thornton SM, Kelly BO. 1992. Crab-eating in the diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin: dealing with dangerous prey. J Mar Biological Assoc UK. 72:835–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietl GP. 2003. Coevolution of a marine gastropod predator and its dangerous bivalve prey. Biol J Linn Soc. 80:409–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusseldorp GL. 2010. Prey choice during the South African Middle Stone Age: avoiding dangerous prey or maximising returns? Afr Archaeol Rev. 27:107–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embar K, Raveh A, Burns D, Kotler BP. 2014. To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game. Oecologia. 175:825–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris RN. 1989. Nonlethal injury to organisms as a mechanism of population regulation. Am Nat. 134:835–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugie DM, Dill LM. 1994. Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. J Fish Biol. 45:151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laundré JW, Hernández L, Ripple WJ. 2010. The landscape of fear: ecological implications of being afraid. Open Ecol J. 3:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Líznarová E, Pekár S. 2013. Dangerous prey is associated with a type 4 functional response in spiders. Anim Behav. 85:1183–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Dall SRX, Gresser S, Ganey D, Bouskila A. 2002. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: Temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol Ecol Res. 4:495–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler BP, Brown JS, Mukherjee S, Berger-Tal O, Bouskila O. 2010. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging Proc R Soc Lon B. 277:1469–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SL, Dill LM. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus Can J Zool. 68:619–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotka AJ. 1925. Elements of physical biology. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell WA, Lima SL. 2002. Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey. Oikos. 99:249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Heithaus MR. 2013. Dangerous prey and daring predators: a review. Biol Rev. 88:550–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connell DJ, Formanowicz DR Jr. 1998. Differential handling of dangerous and non-dangerous prey by naive and experienced Texas spotted whiptail lizards, Cnemidophorus gularis. J Herpetol. 32:75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlman Y, Tsurim I. 2008. Daring, risk assessment and body condition interactions in steppe buzzards Buteo buteo vulpinus. J Avian Biol. 39:226–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenheim JA. 2004. Top predators constrain the habitat selection games played by intermediate predators and their prey. Isr J Zool. 50:129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML, MacArthur RH. 1963. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. Am Nat. 97:209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoni LS. 2012. Living with large carnivores: insights from diet choice, habitat use, and the ecology of fear [ doctoral dissertation]. Urbana (IL): Illinois Natural History Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Sweitzer RA. 1996. Predation or starvation: consequences of foraging decisions by porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum). J Mammal. 77:1068–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar