Processing of biscuit industrial effluent using thin film composite nanofiltration membranes

References

• Zacharof MP, Lovitt RW. The filtration characteristics of anaerobic digester effluents employing cross flow ceramic membrane microfiltration for nutrient recovery. Desalination. 2014;341:27–37.10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder M. Basic principles of membrane technology. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Baker RW. Membrane technology and applications. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.10.1002/0470020393
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen M, Reynolds N, Vigneswaran S. By-product recovery from cottage cheese production by nanofiltration. J. Clean. Prod. 2003;11:803–807.10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilal N, Busca G, Hankins N, et al. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of metal-working fluids. Desalination. 2004;167:227–238.10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrinic I, Bajraktari N, Helix-Nielsen C. Membrane technologies for water treatment and reuse in the textile industry. In: Basile A, Cassano A, Rastogi NK, editors. Advances in membrane technologies for water treatment: materials, processes and applications. 1st ed. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2015. Chapter 17; p. 537–550, ISBN: 978-1-78242-121-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gobi K, Vadivelu VM. By-products of palm oil mill effluent treatment plant – a step towards sustainability. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2013;28:788–803.10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harisha RS, Hosamani KM, Keri RS, et al. Arsenic removal from drinking water using thin film composite nanofiltration membrane. Desalination. 2010;252:75–80.10.1016/j.desal.2009.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau WJ, Ismail AF. Polymeric nanofiltration membranes for textile dye wastewater treatment: preparation, performance evaluation, transport modelling, and fouling control – a review. Desalination. 2009;245:321–348.10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braeken L, Van der Bruggen B. Feasibility of nanofiltration for the removal of endocrine disrupting compounds. Desalination. 2009;240:127–131.10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanakis CM. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012;26:68–87.10.1016/j.tifs.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarleton ES, Robinson JP, Low JS. Nanofiltration: a technology for selective solute removal from fuels and solvents. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2009;87:271–279.10.1016/j.cherd.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi F. Current and future applications for nanofiltration technology in the food processing. Food Bioprod. Process. 2014;92:161–177.10.1016/j.fbp.2013.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianquan Luo JM, Wan Y. Desalination of effluents with highly concentrated salt by nanofiltration: from laboratory to pilot-plant. Desalination. 2013;315:91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freger V. Nanoscale heterogeneity of polyamide membranes formed by interfacial polymerization. Langmuir. 2003;19:4791–4797.10.1021/la020920q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler R, Srebnik S. Molecular simulation of polyamide synthesis by interfacial polymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;315:100–105.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CK, Kim JH, Roh IJ, et al. The changes of membrane performance with polyamide molecular structure in the reverse osmosis process. J. Membr. Sci. 2000;165:189–199.10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00232-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yu S, Liu M, et al. Polyamide thin film composite membrane prepared from m-phenylenediamine and m-phenylenediamine-5-sulfonic acid. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;270:165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Saha NK, Joshi SV. Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type. J. Membr. Sci. 2009;342:60–69.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veríssimo S, Peinemann KV, Bordado J. Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;279:266–275.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegal J, Min SG, Lee KH. Factors affecting the interfacial polymerization of polyamide active layers for the formation of polyamide composite membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002;86:2781–2787.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kwak SY, Suzuki T. Positron annihilation spectroscopic evidence to demonstrate the flux-enhancement mechanism in morphology-controlled thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:1764–1770.10.1021/es049453k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yu S, Liu M, et al. Effect of mixed crosslinking agents on performance of thin-film-composite membranes. Desalination. 2006;192:182–189.10.1016/j.desal.2005.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan M, Wang Z, Xu J, et al. Influence of hexamethyl phosphoramide on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010;75:145–155.10.1016/j.seppur.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad AL, Ooi BS, Mohammad AW, et al. Development of a highly hydrophilic nanofiltration membrane for desalination and water treatment. Desalination. 2004;168:215–221.10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang YC, Hsub YZ, Ruaan RC, et al. Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine. J. Membr. Sci. 2009;326:19–26.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Seman MN, Khayet M, Hilal N. Nanofiltration thin-film composite polyester polyethersulfone – based membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2010;348:109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Seman MN, Khayet M, Hilal N. Development of antifouling properties and performance of nanofiltration membranes modified by interfacial polymerisation. Desalination. 2011;273:36–47.10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkata Swamy B, Madhumala M, Prakasham RS, et al. Nanofiltration of bulk drug industrial effluent using indigenously developed functionalized polyamide membrane. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;233:193–200.10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyani S, Smitha B, Sridhar S, et al. Blend membranes of sodium alginate and hydroxyethylcellulose for pervaporation-based enrichment of t-butyl alcohol. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006;64:425–432.10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mária P, Ondrej S, Alena K, et al. FTIR spectroscopy study of polyamide-6 irradiated by electron and proton beams. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012;97:523–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Aassar A-hMA. Polyamide thin film composite membranes using interfacial polymerization: synthesis, characterization and reverse rsmosis performance for water desalination. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2012;6:382–391.
   Google Scholar
• Tin PS, Chung TS, Liu Y, et al. Effects of cross-linking modification on gas separation performance of Matrimid membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2003;225:77–90.10.1016/j.memsci.2003.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: APHA-AWWA-WPCF; 1998.
   Google Scholar