Controlled grafting of vinylic monomers on polyolefins: a robust mathematical modeling approach

References

• Roeder J, Oliveira RVB, Gonçalves MC, et al. Polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends: influence of compatibilizing agent on interface domains. Polym. Testing. 2002;21:815–821.10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utracki LA. Polymer blends handbook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson AN, Clemens ML, Harding VM. The effects of SEBS-g-maleic anhydride reaction on the morphology and properties of polypropylene/PA6/SEBS ternary blends. Polymer. 2004;45:5239–5249.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippi S, Chiono V, Polacco G, et al. Reactive compatibilizer precursors for LDPE/PA6 blends, 1. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002;203:1512–1525.10.1002/1521-3935(200207)203:10/11<1512::AID-MACP1512>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Filippi S, Magagnini P. Reactive compatibilizer precursors for LDPE/PA6 blends. II: maleic anhydride grafted polyethylenes. Polymer. 2003;44:2411–2422.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00133-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeb MR, Khonakdar HA, Razban M, et al. Morphology prediction in HDPE/PA-6/EVOH ternary blends: defining the role of elasticity ratio. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012;213:1791–1802.10.1002/macp.201200158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeb MR, Khonakdar HA, Jafari SH, et al. Interface evaluation in the ternary blends of HDPE/PA-6/EVOH. Polym. Bull. 2014;71:613–624.10.1007/s00289-013-1082-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastin H, Jafari SH, Saeb MR, et al. Mechanical, rheological, and thermal behavior assessments in HDPE/PA-6/EVOH ternary blends with variable morphology. J. Polym. Res. 2014;21:351–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeb MR, Khonakdar HA, Moghri M, et al. Identifying morphological changes in immiscible polyolefin ternary blends. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2014;53:1142–1149.10.1080/03602559.2014.886115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastin H, Jafari SH, Saeb MR, et al. On the reliability of existing theoretical models in anticipating type of morphology and domain size in HDPE/PA-6/EVOH ternary blends. Eur. Polymer J. 2014;53:1–12.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili R, Jafari SH, Saeb MR, et al. Toward in situ compatibilization of polyolefin ternary blends through morphological manipulations. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2014;299:1197–1212.10.1002/mame.v299.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khonakdar HA, Jafari SH, Mirzadeh S, et al. Rheology-morphology correlation in PET/PP blends: influence of type of compatibilizer. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2013;19:25–30.10.1002/vnl.20318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moini Jazani O, Arefazar A, Jafari SH, et al. SEBS-g-MAH as a reactive compatibilizer precursor for PP/PTT/SEBS ternary blends: morphology and mechanical properties. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013;52:206–212.10.1080/03602559.2012.735739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moini Jazani O, Arefazar A, Peymanfar MR, et al. The influence of NBR-g-GMA compatibilizer on the morphology and mechanical properties of poly (ethyleneterephthalate)/polycarbonate/NBR ternary blends. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013;52:1295–1302.10.1080/03602559.2013.763349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvestani MRY, Arefazar A, Moini Jazani O, et al. Effect of poly [styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene] (SEBS) and maleic anhydride-grafted SEBS triblock copolymers in immiscible blends of (polyamide-6)/ polycarbonate: morphology-mechanical properties relationships. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2015;21:245–252.10.1002/vnl.21385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastin H, Saeb MR, Jafari SH, et al. Reactive compatibilization of ternary polymer blends with core-shell type morphology. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2015;300:86–98.10.1002/mame.201400144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie XM, Chen NH, Guo BH, et al. Study of multi-monomer melt-grafting onto polypropylene in an extruder. Polym. Int. 2000;49:1677–1683.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passaglia E, Coiai S, Augier S. Control of macromolecular architecture during the reactive functionalization in the melt of olefin polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009;34:911–947.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton EL, Woodhead M, Coates P, et al. Reactive grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto polypropylene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010;117:2707–2714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeb MR, Garmabi H. Investigation of styrene-assisted free-radical grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto high-density polyethylene using response surface method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009;111:1600–1605.10.1002/app.v111:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque MMU, Pracella M. Reactive compatibilization of composites of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers with cellulose fibres. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf.. 2010;41:1545–1550.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JL, Xie XM. Reconsideration on the mechanism of free-radical melt grafting of glycidyl methacrylate on polyolefin. Polymer. 2012;53:2197–2204.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho KY, Eom JY, Kim CH, et al. Grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto high-density polyethylene with reaction time in the batch mixer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008;108:1093–1099.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LF, Wong B, Baker WE. Melt grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto polypropylene and reactive compatibilization of rubber toughened polypropylene. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1996;36:1594–1607.10.1002/(ISSN)1548-2634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CH, Cho KY, Park JK. Grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto polycaprolactone: preparation and characterization. Polymer. 2001;42:5135–5142.10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmizadeh E, Moghri M, Saeb MR, et al. Application of Taguchi approach in describing the mechanical properties and thermal decomposition behavior of poly(vinyl chloride)/clay nanocomposites: highlighting the role of organic modifier. Vol. 22. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2014;182–190. doi:10.1002/vnl.21395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xie XM, Guo BH. Study on styrene-assisted melt free-radical grafting of maleic anhydride onto polypropylene. Polymer. 2001;42:3419–3425.10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00767-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartier H, Hu GH. Styrene-assisted melt free radical grafting of glycidyl methacrylate onto polypropylene. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 1998;36:1053–1063.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesneau I, Champagne MF, Huneault MA. Glycidyl methacrylate–grafted linear low-density polyethylene fabrication and application for polyester/polyethylene bonding. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004;91:3180–3191.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moini Jazani O, Arefazar A, Saeb MR, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties of polypropylene/polycarbonate/SEBS ternary polymer blends using Taguchi experimental analysis. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010;116:2312–2319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moini Jazani O, Arefazar A, Jafari SH, et al. Study on the effect of processing conditions on the impact strength of PP/SEBS/PC ternary blends using Taguchi experimental analysis. J. Polym. Eng. 2011;31:237–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahromi AE, Arefazar A, Moini Jazani O, et al. Taguchi-based analysis of polyamide 6/acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber/ nanoclay nanocomposites: The role of processing variables. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013;130:820–828.10.1002/app.39191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeb MR, Moghri M, Khonakdar HA, et al. Fusion level optimization of rigid PVC nanocompounds by using response surface methodology. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2013;19:168–176.10.1002/vnl.v19.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghri M, Khakpour M, Akbarian M, et al. Employing response surface approach for optimization of fusion characteristics in rigid foam PVC/clay nanocomposites. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2015;21:51–59.10.1002/vnl.v21.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakdel AS, Behbahani MR, Saeb MR, et al. Evolution of vinyl chloride conversion below critical micelle concentration: a response surface analysis. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2015;21:157–167.10.1002/vnl.v21.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeb MR, Moghri M. Application of response surface methodology in describing fusion characteristics of rigid poly(vinyl chloride)/nanoclay/wood flour/calcium carbonate hybrid nanocomposites. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2015;21:183–190.10.1002/vnl.v21.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cybenko G. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math. Control Signal. Syst. 1989;2:303–314.10.1007/BF02551274
   Google Scholar
• Cybenko G. Complexity theory of neural networks and classification problems. In: Almeida LB, Wellekens CJ, editors. Neural Networks EURASIP Workshop Sesimbra; 1990; Portugal. p. 24–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zou J, Han Y, So SS. Overview of artificial neural networks. In: Livingstone DJ, editor. Methods in molecular biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2008. p. 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Zhu Y, Xiao G, et al. Application of artificial neural networks to predict corrosion behavior of Ni–SiC composite coatings deposited by ultrasonic electrodeposition. Ceram. Int. 2014;40:5425–5430.10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekmatjoo N, Ahmadi Z, Taromi FA, et al. Modeling of glycolysis of flexible polyurethane foam wastes by artificial neural network (ANN) methodology. Polym. Int. 2015;64:1111–1120.10.1002/pi.2015.64.issue-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipowski A, Lipowska D. Roulette-wheel selection via stochastic acceptance. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2012;391:2193–2196.10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betiku E, Ajala SO. Modeling and optimization of Thevetia peruviana (yellow oleander) oil biodiesel synthesis via Musa paradisiacal (plantain) peels as heterogeneous base catalyst: a case of artificial neural network vs. response surface methodology. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014;53:314–322.10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenivasulu R. Optimization of surface roughness and delamination damage of GFRP composite material in end milling using Taguchi design method and artificial neural network. Proc. Eng. 2013;64:785–794.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.154
   Google Scholar
• Ma P, Jiang L, Ye T, et al. Melt free-radical grafting of maleic anhydride onto biodegradable poly(lactic acid) by using styrene as a comonomer. Polymers. 2014;6:1528–1543.10.3390/polym6051528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• He X, Zheng S, Huang G, et al. Solution grafting of maleic anhydride on low-density polyethylene: effect on crystallization behavior. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys.. 2013;52:1265–1282.10.1080/00222348.2013.764217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito GF, Xin J, Zhang P, et al. Enhanced melt free radical grafting efficiency of polyethylene using a novel redox initiation method. RSC Adv. 2014;4:26425–26433.10.1039/c4ra03607g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink JK. Reactive polymers fundamentals and applications: a concise guide to industrial polymers. Norwich, NY: William Andrew; 2005.
   Google Scholar