1,211
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Superintendent and Educational Reform in the United States of America

, &

REFERENCES

  • Achilles, C. M., & Lintz, M. N. (1983, November). Public confidence in public education: A growing concern in the 80’s. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN.
  • Bacharach, S. ( Ed.). (1990). Educational reform: Making sense of it all. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bell, D. (1999). The coming of the post-industrial society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
  • Berliner, D. C., Glass, G. V., & Associates. (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Björk, L. G. (1996). The revisionists’ critique of the education reform reports. Journal of School Leadership, 6(3), 290–315.
  • Björk, L. G. (2001). Preparing the next generation of superintendents: Integrating formal and experiential knowledge. In C. C. Brunner & L. G. Björk ( Eds.), The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories of school management and educational ( pp. 19–54). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Björk, L. G. (2005). Superintendent-board relations: An historical overview of the dynamics of change and sources of conflict and collaboration. In G. J. Petersen & L. D. Fusarelli ( Eds.), The district superintendent and school board relations: Trends in policy development and implementation ( pp. 1–22). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski ( Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development ( pp.163–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). The school district superintendent in the United States of America. In A. E. Nir ( Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation—an international perspective ( pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Nova Science.
  • Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski ( Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development ( pp. 45–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Björk, L., & Lindle, J. C. (2001). Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 76–91.
  • Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Blase, J., & Björk, L. (2010). Micropolitics of educational change and reform: Cracking open the black box. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins ( Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change ( Part 1, pp. 237–260). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Blumberg, A. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Bracey, G. W. (2009). Education hell: Rhetoric vs. reality: Transforming the fire consuming America’s schools. Alexandria, VA: Educational Research Service.
  • Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Glass, T. E. (2005). Superintendent as organizational manager. In L. G. Björk, & T. J. Kowalski ( Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development ( pp. 137–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Brunner, C. C., Grogan, M., & Björk, L. G. (2002). Shifts in the discourse defining the superintendency: Historical and current foundations of the position. In J. Murphy ( Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century ( pp. 211–238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Callahan, R. E. (1966). The superintendent of schools: A historical analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate Institute of Education, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 410).
  • Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2013, January). What do international tests really show about U. S. student performance? Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Carter, G., & Cunningham, W. (1997). The American school superintendent: Leading in the age of pressure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Chance, P. L., & Björk, L. G. (2004).The social dimensions of public relations. In T. J. Kowalski ( Ed.), Public relations in schools (3rd ed., pp. 125–148). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets and American schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
  • Clark, D. L., & Astuto, T. A. (1994). Redirecting reform: Challenges to popular assumptions about teachers and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(7), 512–520.
  • Connors, R., & Smith, T. (2011). Time to say enough! Agenda, 1(1), 4.
  • Cooper, B. S., & Boyd, W. L. (1987). The evolution of training for school administrators. In J. Murphy & P. Hallinger ( Eds.), Approaches to administrative training in education ( pp. 3–27). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (2014). The Common Core State Standards Initiative. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Programs/The_Common_Core_State_Standards_Initiative.html
  • Crowson, R. L., & McPherson, R. B. (1987). The legacy of the theory movement: Learning from the new tradition. In J. Murphy & P. Hallinger ( Eds.), Approaches to administrative training in education ( pp. 45–64). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Cuban, L. (1976a). Urban school chiefs under fire. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
  • Cuban, L. (1976b). The urban school superintendent: A century and a half of change. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
  • Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Culbertson, J. A. (1981). Antecedents of the theory movement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 25–47.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). The futures of teaching. Educational Leadership, 46(3), 4–10.
  • Duke, D. (2004). The challenge of educational change. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Finn, C. E. (1991). We must take charge. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Firestone, W. A., Furhman, S., & Kirst, M. W. (1990). An overview of educational reform since 1983. In J. Murphy ( Ed.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases ( pp. 349–364). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., & Shelley, B. E. (2010). Highlights from PISA 2009: Performance of U.S.15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context (NCES 2011-004). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London, UK: Falmer Press.
  • Fusarelli, B. C., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2005). Reconceptualizing the superintendency: Superintendents as social scientists and social activists. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski ( Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development ( pp. 187–206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Gideon, B. H. (2002). Structuring schools for teacher collaboration. Education Digest, 68(2), 30–34.
  • Glass, T. E. (2003, April). The superintendency: A managerial imperative? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Glass, T. E., Björk, L. G., & Brunner, C. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, VA.: American Association of School Administrators.
  • Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy ( Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century ( pp. 1–19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Grieder, C., Pierce, T. M., & Jordan, K. F. (1969). Public school administration (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Ronald Press.
  • Guzley, R. M. (1992). Organizational climate and communication climate: Predictors of commitment to the organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(4), 379–402.
  • Howlett, P. (1993). The politics of school leaders, past and future. Education Digest, 58(9), 18–21.
  • Hoyle, J. R., Björk, L. G., Collier, V., & Glass, T. (2005). The superintendent as CEO: Standards-based performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Johnson, B. C., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2003, April). Superintendent as social scientist. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Kirst, M. W., & Wirt, F. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Kochan, F. K., Jackson, B. L., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line: A study of educational leaders, their jobs, their preparation and the problems they face. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (1995). Keepers of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (1999). The school superintendent: Theory, practice, and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (2001). The future of local school governance: Implications for board members and superintendents. In C. C. Brunner & L. G. Björk ( Eds.), The new superintendency ( pp. 183–201). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (2003). Superintendent shortage: The wrong problem and the wrong solutions. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 288–303.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (2005). Evolution of the school district superintendent position. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski ( Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development ( pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (2006). The school superintendent: Theory, practice and cases (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kowalski, T. J. (2013). The school superintendent: Theory, practices, and cases (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
  • Kowalski, T. J., & Björk, L. G. (2005). Role expectations of district superintendents: Implications for deregulating preparation and licensing. Journal of Thought, 40(2), 73–96.
  • Kowalski, T. J., & Glass, T. E. (2002). Preparing superintendents in the 21st century. In B. S. Cooper & L. D. Fusarelli ( Eds.), The promises and perils facing today’s school superintendent ( pp. 41–60). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
  • Kowalski, T. J., & Keedy, J. L. (2005). Preparing superintendents to be effective communicators. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski ( Eds.), School district superintendents: Role expectations, professional preparation, development and licensing ( pp. 207–226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2010). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Lane, J., & Epps, E. ( Eds.). (1992). Restructuring schools: Problems and prospects. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • Laswell, H. D. (1990). Politics: Who gets what when and how. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Fernanadez, A. (1994). Transformational leadership and teachers’ commitment to change. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis ( Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts ( pp. 77–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Levin, H. M. (1999). The public-private nexus in education. The American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 124–137.
  • Luthans, F. (1981). Organizational behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Melby, E. O. (1955). Administering community education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Murphy, J. (1990). The reform of American public education in the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  • National Governors Association. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/cms/home/nga-center-for-best-practices/center-divisions/center-issues/page-edu-issues/col2-content/main-content-list/common-core-state-standards.html
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (n.d.). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
  • Petersen, G. J., & Barnett, B. G. (2005). Superintendent as instructional leader: Current practice, future conceptualizations, and implications for preparation. In L. G. Björk & T. G. Kowalski ( Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development ( pp. 107–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Peterson, K. D., & Finn, D. E. (1985, Spring). Principals, superintendents and the administrator’s art. The Public Interest, 79, 42–62.
  • Picus, L. O., & Odden, A. R. (2011). Reinventing school finance: Falling forward. Peabody Journal of Education: Issues of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, 86(3), 291–303.
  • Pulliam, J. D., & Van Patten, J. D. (2006). History of education in America (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of terror: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting the culture of school and the problem of change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 229–240.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J., Kelleher, P., McCarthy, M. M., & Wirt, F. (2004). Educational governance and administration (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Snavely, W. B., & Walters, E. V. (1983). Differences in communication competence among administrative social styles. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 11(2), 120–135.
  • Spring, J. (1994). The American school, 1642–1993 (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Starratt, R. K. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 185–202.
  • Trombetta, J. J., & Rogers, D. P. (1988). Communication climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: The effects of information adequacy communication openness, and decision participation. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(4), 494–514.
  • Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need—and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York, NY: Scribner.
  • Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.