492
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Disentangling the Personal Agenda: Identity and School Board Members’ Perceptions of Problems and Solutions

&

References

  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (2009). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 87–107. doi:10.2307/2673158
  • Alsbury, T. L. (2008). Hitting a moving target: How politics determines the changing roles of superintendents and school boards. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 126–147). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Alsbury, T. L., Mountford, M., & Delagardelle, M. (2011, April). Democratic education at risk? Policy implications from the first national school board survey. Presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
  • Bers, T. H. (1978). Local political elites: Men and women on boards of education. The Western Political Quarterly, 31(3), 381–391. doi:10.2307/447738
  • Bill Haslam for Governor. (2014). Haslam announces $5.2 million raised for re-election bid. Retrieved from http://www.billhaslam.com/
  • Brown, K. M., Akintobi, T. H., Pitt, S., Berends, V., McDermott, R., Agron, P., & Purcell, A. (2004). California school board members’ perceptions of factors influencing school nutrition policy. The Journal of School Health, 74(2), 52–58. doi:10.1111/josh.2004.74.issue-2
  • Burden, B. C. (2007). Personal roots of representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Burke, P. J. (2006). Interaction in small groups. In J. Delameter (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 363–388). Madison, WI: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
  • Calderon, V. J. (2014, August 20). Americans wary of federal influence on public schools. Washington, DC: Gallup.
  • Camera, L. (2015, April 7). Senate education leaders unveil bipartisan compromise to rewrite ESEA. Langhorne, PA: Education Week.
  • Cistone, P. J. (2008). School board research: A retrospective. In T. L. Alsbury (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 25–36). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Cistone, P. J., & Hennessy, B. (1971). School board members’ attitudes and administrative forms: An explanation of public-regardingness. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 587–594. doi:10.2307/2110113
  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088
  • Dennis, C. (1990). The election and impact of Black school board members: The effect of community racial and political attitudes. State & Local Government Review, 22(1), 22–26.
  • Diem, S., Frankenberg, E., & Cleary, C. (2015). Factors that influence school board policy making: The political context of student diversity in urban-suburban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 712–752.
  • Editorial Staff. (2014. April 16). “Tennessee promise” passes house, senate, TNReport. Retrieved from http://tnreport.com/2014/04/16/tennessee-promise-passes-legislature/
  • Foster, L. S. (1983). Political culture: A determinant of public regardingness among school board members. Urban Education, 18(1), 29–39. doi:10.1177/004208598301800103
  • Fraga, L. R., & Elis, R. (2009). Interests and representation: Ethnic advocacy on California school boards. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 659–682.
  • Fraga, L. R., Meier, K. J., & England, R. E. (1986). Hispanic Americans and educational policy: Limits to equal access. The Journal of Politics, 48(4), 850. doi:10.2307/2131003
  • Haslam, B. (2012). State of the state address: Tennessee - America at its best. Retrieved from http://www.tn.gov/assets/entities/governor/attachments/020314_State_of_the_State_Address_-_FINAL_(clean).pdf
  • Hess, F. M., & Meeks, O. (2010). School boards circa 2010: Governance in the accountability era. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association/Thomas B. Fordham Institute/Iowa School Boards Foundation.
  • Kelderman, E. (2014, February 6). Free community college? Tennessee proposal draws praise and concerns’, The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Free-Community-College-/144553/
  • Kimbrough, R. B. (1982). Do political ideologies influence education in the United States? Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(2), 22–38. doi:10.1177/0013161X82018002003
  • Kirst, M. W. (2008). The evolving role of school boards: Retrospect and prospect. In T. L. Alsbury (Ed.), The Future of School Board Governance: Relevancy and Revelation (pp. 37–60). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.
  • Leal, D. L., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Meier, K. J. (2008). The politics of Latino education: The biases of at-large elections. The Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1224–1244. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3816.2004.00297.x
  • Manna, P. (2011). Collision course: Federal education policy meets state and local realities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  • McLendon, M. K., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2008). Understanding education policy change in the American states: Lessons from political science. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 30–51). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Meier, K. J., & England, R. E. (1984). Black representation and educational policy: Are they related? The American Political Science Review, 78(2), 392–403. doi:10.2307/1963371
  • Meier, K. J., Juenke, E. G., Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (2005). Structural choices and representational biases: The post-election color of representation. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 758–768. doi:10.1111/ajps.2005.49.issue-4
  • Mountford, M., & Brunner, C. C. (2010). Gendered behavior patterns in school board governance. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2067–2117.
  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–632. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
  • Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Robbins, L. (2010) ‘Deep roots, strong tree.’ Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Magazine.
  • Rocha, R. R., & Wrinkle, R. D. (2011). Gender, ethnicity, and support for bilingual education: Will just any woman or Latino do? A contingent “no.” Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 309–328. doi:10.1111/psj.2011.39.issue-2
  • Ross, A. D., Rouse, S. M., & Bratton, K. A. (2010). Latino representation and education: Pathways to Latino student performance. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(1), 69–95. doi:10.1177/153244001001000104
  • Saatcioglu, A. (2015). School boards in their environment: Balancing brokerage and closure. In T. L. Alsbury, & P. Gore (Eds.), Improving school board effectiveness: A balanced governance approach (pp. 43–52). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2009). The public policy theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Special to the Banner. (2014). Governor’s plan inspired by Tennessee Achieves, Cleveland Banner. Retrieved from http://www.clevelandbanner.com/view/full_story/24563279/article-Governor-s-plan-inspired-by-Tennessee-Achieves
  • Stewart, J., England, R. E., & Meier, K. J. (1989). Black representation in urban school districts: From school board to office to classroom. The Western Political Quarterly, 42(2), 287–305. doi:10.2307/448356
  • Sudermann, H. (2009). A seat at the table: Washington’s Senator Patty Murray ‘72 clings to a humble beginning, but wields influence and power and dishes out results for her state’s struggling citizens. Pullman, WA: Washington State Magazine.
  • TN Newsroom & Media Center. (2014). Haslam unveils visionary “Tennessee promise.” Retrieved from http://news.tn.gov/node/11955
  • Transue, J. E. (2007). Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 78–91. doi:10.1111/ajps.2007.51.issue-1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.