Learning to Lead with Data: From Espoused Theory to Theory-in-Use

References

• Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292–327. doi:10.1080/15700761003731492
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2010). Driven by data: A practical guide to improve instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, M., & Eisenstat, R. A. (1996). Developing an organization capable of implementing strategy and learning. Human Relations, 49(5), 567–619. doi:10.1177/001872679604900504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–75. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, S., Christman, J., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. (2010). Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Boudett, K. P., City, E., & Murnane, R. (Eds.). (2005). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. R., Davis, J., Garrett, K., & Holleran, J. (2010). A new approach to principal preparation. Fort Worth, TX: R. C. Foundation Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Christman, J. B., Neild, R. C., Bulkley, K. E., Blanc, S., Mitchell, C., Liu, R., & Travers, E. (2009). Making the most of interim assessment data: Lessons from Philadelphia’s Managed Instruction System. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement, 9, 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S., & Yanov, D. (1996). Culture and organizational learning. In M. Cohen, & L. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 430–459). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Copland, M. A., Knapp, M. S., & Swinnerton, J. A. (2009). Principal leadership, data, and school improvement. In T. J. Kowalski, & T. J. Lasley II (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, A.-M., Heppen, J., Li, Y., Stachel, S., Jones, W., Sawyer, K., … Lewis, S. (2012). Charting success: Data use and student achievement in urban schools. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H., & Camburn, E. (2008). School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 332–352. doi:10.1108/09578230810869275
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., Pritchett, R. B., & Watson, J. G. (2007). Formative feedback systems and the new instructional leadership. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University for Wisconsin-Madisona. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S. S., Mandinach, E. B., Supovitz, J. A., & Wayman, J. C. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. IES practice guide. NCEE 2009-4067. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators’ roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 292–338. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houchens, G. W., Hurt, J., Stobaugh, R., & Keedy, J. L. (2012). Double-loop learning: A coaching protocol for enhancing principal instructional leadership. QRE-Qualitative Research in Education, 1(2), 135–178.
   Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the “data-driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Evidence and Decision Making: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 105–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. doi:10.1086/505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Swinnerton, J. A., Copland, M. A., & Monpas-Huber, J. (2006). Data-informed leadership in education. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Lawrence, L., & Sharrett, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 243–276. doi:10.1177/0013161X98034002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. E., & Wahlstrom, K. L. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the learning from leadership project. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Minneapolis, MN: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). Defining data literacy: A report on a convening of experts. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 13(2), 6–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., & Jackson, S. S. (2012). Transforming teaching and learning through data-driven decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2014). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. doi:10.1177/1741143214537229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., McNulty, B. A., & Waters, T. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• McCotter, S. M., Bulkley, K. E., & Bankowski, C. (2016). Another way to go: Multiple pathways to developing inclusive, instructional leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 26(4), 633–650.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, M. T., & Orphanos, S. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 1–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panero, N. S., & Talbert, J. E. (2013). Strategic inquiry: Starting small for big results in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer, J. Z., & Spillane, J. P. (2011). Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 611–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Harris, A., Jones, M., & Mertz, K. (2015). Opportunities and challenges for taking a distributed perspective: Novice school principals’ emerging sense of their new position. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1068–1085. doi:10.1002/berj.3166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Lee, L. C. (2014). Novice school principals’ sense of ultimate responsibility problems of practice in transitioning to the principal’s office. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(3), 431–465. doi:10.1177/0013161X13505290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Miele, D. B. (2007). Evidence in practice: A framing of the terrain. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Yearbook of the national society for the study of education (Vol. 106, pp. 46–73). Malden, MA: National Society for the Study of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Klein, V. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C. (2013). Leading data use: Pre-service courses for principals and superintendents. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 13(2), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar