Using Highly Effective Student Assessment Practices as the Impetus for School Change: A Bioecological Case Study

References

• Aitken, E. N. (2009). Effective leadership and assessment working together for school improvement: Hitching the horse to the cart. International Journal of Learning, 16(3), 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Education. (1997). Teaching quality standard applicable to the provision of basic education in Alberta (Ministerial Order (#016/97). Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Education. (2009). Principal quality practice guidelines: Promoting successful school leadership in Alberta. Edmonton, Canada: Author. Retrieved from http://education.alberta.ca/admin/resources.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Teachers’ Association. (2014). A week in the life of Alberta school leaders. Edmonton, AB: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge School of Education. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/assessment-reform-group
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21. doi:10.1177/003172170408600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1989). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(9), 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, G., & Schmidt-Davis, J. (2010). The three essentials: Improving schools requires district vision, district and state support, and principal leadership. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Who cares for children? In H. Nuba, M. Searson, & D. Sheiman (Eds.), Resources for early childhood (pp. 113–129). New York, NY: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman, & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006a). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner, & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, 6th ed., pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006b). The bioecological model of human development. In R. W. Lerner, & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (pp. 793–829). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S., & Bronowicz, D. (2003). “I don’t like writing. It makes my fingers hurt”: Students talk about their classroom assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(2), 221–242. doi:10.1080/0969594032000121298
   Google Scholar
• Buffum, A., Mattos, M., & Weber, S. (2012). Simplifying response to intervention: Four essential guiding principles. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattonar, B., Lessard, C., Blais, J. G., Larose, F., Riopel, M. C., Tardif, M., … Wright, A. (2007). School principals in Canada: Context, profil and work. In Pancanadian surveys of principals and teachers in elementary and secondary schools: Current trends in the evolution of school personnel in Canadian elementary and secondary schools. Montreal, Canada: Faculté des Sciences de l’éducation, Université de Montréal. Retrieved from https://depot.erudit.org/id/003083dd
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: The Macmillian Company.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, S. (2009). What did you do in school today? Teaching effectiveness: A framework and rubric. Toronto, ON: Canadian Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.cdl.org/resource-library/articles/change_ldr.php
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement. Jolimont, Australia: The Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2010). The awesome power of the principal. Principal, 89(4), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2007). Multiple sources of evidence: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions of various indicators of student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 26(1), 19–27. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00085.x
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2010). Developing instructional leadership. In B. Davies & M. Burnett (Eds.), Developing successful leaders (pp. 61–76). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. doi:10.1108/09578231111116699
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. doi:10.1177/0013161x96032001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. (2010). School formative feedback systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 130–146. doi:10.1080/01619561003685270
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of Learning. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542. doi:10.3102/00346543066004507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: Research and policy in the (Dis)United Kingdom. In R. Berry (Ed.), Assessment reform in education (pp. 15–32). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. The Curriculum Journal, 17, 109–138. doi:10.1080/09585170600792712
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. (1999). Keepin’ it real: Personalizing school experiences for diverse learners to create harmony and minimize interethnic conflict. The Journal of Negro Education, 68(4), 496–510. doi:10.2307/2668150
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Copland, M., Honig, M., Plecki, M. L., & Portin, B. S. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy (CTP) at the University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2012a). The Ontario leadership framework 2012. Toronto, Canada: The Institute for Education Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2012b). The Ontario leadership framework 2012: With a discussion of the research foundations (p. 65). Toronto, Canada: The Institute for Education Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Anderson, S., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2010). School leaders’ influences on student learning: The four paths. In T. Bush, L. Bell, & D. Middlewood (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (pp. 13–30). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. doi:10.1177/0013161x08321501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. doi:10.1177/0013161x10377347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, C. (2015). “Where is ____?”: Culture and the process of change in the development of inclusive schools. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 11(1), 16–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pitner, N. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 106–132). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Preissle, J. (2006). Envisioning qualitative inquiry: A view across four decades. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 685–695. doi:10.1080/09518390600975701
   Google Scholar
• Principles for Fair Student Assessment Practices for Education in Canada. (1993). Edmonton, Canada: Joint Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackney, L., & Walker, K. (2006). Canadian perspectives on beginning principals: Their role in building capacity for learning communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 341–358. doi:10.1108/09578230610676578
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
   Google Scholar
• Sands, A. (2013, April 12). 150 people protest in Camrose over new student grading system. Edmonton Journal, p.A3.
   Google Scholar
• School Improvement Branch. (2013). Alberta initiative for school improvement. Cycle 5: Project summaries from public, separate, private, charter and Francophone school authorities, Zones 1–6, February 2013. Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sharrat, L., & Fullan, M. (2009). Realization: The change imperative for deepening district-wide reform. Ontario, Canada: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004
   Google Scholar
• Slomp, D. (2012). Challenges in assessing the development of writing ability. Assessing Writing, 17, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Staples, D. (2013, September 25). Trustees must fight for quality education: We can’t repeat a fiasco like the “no zeros” policy. Edmonton Journal, p.A5.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316. doi:10.1080/01411920902919257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, C., Aitken, N., Lupert, J., & Scott, S. (2009). The Alberta Student Assessment Study: Final report. Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar