Assessing International Teacher and Principal Perceptions of Instructional Leadership: A Multilevel Factor Analysis of TALIS 2008

References

• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Katherine J. Klein & Steve W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, A. J., Blitz, M., Modeste, M., Salisbury, J., & Halverson, R. (2017). How leaders agree with teachers in schools on measures of leadership practice: A two-level latent class analysis of the comprehensive assessment of leadership for learning. Teachers College Record. 119(4) Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=21677.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (in press). Towards an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: Meta-Narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Different levels of leadership for learning: Investigating differences between teachers individually and collectively using multilevel factor analysis of the 2011-2012 Schools and Staffing Survey. International Journal of Leadership in Education, [Epub ahead of print] 1–29, doi:10.1080/13603124.2016.1139187
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, E. (1967). A model for shared decision making in the school principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 3(1), 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. A., & Calzi, F. (1996). The Dark Side of Shared Decision Making. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, C., Peck, C. M., & Reitzug, U. C. (2013). Exiting school improvement sanctions: Accountability, morale, and the successful school turnaround principal. In B. G. Barnett, A. R. Shoho, & A. J. Bowers (Eds.), School and district leadership in an era of accountability (pp. 63–83). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2014). Strengthening collaborative practices in schools: The need to cultivate development perspectives and diagnostic approaches. In A. J. Bowers, A. R. Shoho, & B. G. Barnett (Eds.), Using data in schools to inform leadership and decision making (pp. 67–93). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1976). Research on classrooms and schools: Formulation of questions, design and analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford Evaluation Consortium, School of Education, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• D’Haenens, E., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2010). Multilevel exploratory factor analysis: Illustrating its surplus value in educational effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(2), 209–235. doi:10.1080/09243450903581218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. W., Gooden, M. A., & Bowers, A. J. (2017). Pathways to the principalship: An event history analysis of the careers of teachers with administrator certification. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 207–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Ueno, K. (2006). Are teachers who need sustained, content-focused professional development getting it? An administrator’s dilemma. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 179–215. doi:10.1177/0013161x04273848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & Brodbeck, F. (2004). Cultural endorsed leadership. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 cultures (pp. 270–669). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. C., Masyn, K. E., Johnston, W. R., & Subramanian, S. V. (2015). Modeling contextual effects using individual-level data and without aggregation: an illustration of multilevel factor analysis (MLFA) with collective efficacy. Population health metrics, 13(1), 12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2015). How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), 61–87. doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.904002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., Mangin, M. M., Martinez, M. C., & Polovsky, T. (2005). Leading coherent professional development: A comparison of three districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 413–448. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff, P., Goldring, E., & Bickman, L. (2014). Predicting the gap: Perceptual congruence between American principals and their teachers’ ratings of leadership effectiveness. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s11092-014-9202-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Cravens, X., Porter, A., Murphy, J., & Elliott, S. (2015). The convergent and divergent validity of the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education (VAL-ED) Instructional leadership and emotional intelligence. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123. doi:10.3102/0002831211402663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (1982). Principal instructional management rating scale. Sarasota, FL: Leading Development Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational administration quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. doi:10.1080/13632431003663214
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2011). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. In T. Townsend and J. MacBeth (Eds.), International Handbook of Leadership for Learning (pp. 469–485). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1983). Instructional Leadership and School Socio-Economic Status: A Preliminary Investigation. Administrator’s notebook, 31(5), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987). Assessing and developing principal instructional leadership. Educational leadership, 45(1), 54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härnqvist, K. (1978). Primary mental abilities at collective and individual levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(5), 706–716. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.70.5.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653–681. doi:10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0097
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Examining contextual differences in the development of instructional leadership and school achievement. The Urban Review, 22(4), 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. doi:10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Moriyama, K. (2010). Examining relationships among elementary schools’ contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 377–408. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.500097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J., & Bonne, L. (2011). Configurations of instructional leadership enactments that promote the teaching and learning of mathematics in a New Zealand elementary school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 794–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. L., & Ylimaki, R. M. (2011). Comparative perspectives: An overview of seven educational contexts. In R. M. Ylimaki, & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.), US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation: Implications for successful instructional leadership, organizational learning, and culturally responsive practices (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, Steve W. J., & Klein, Katherine J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein & Kozlowski (Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, F. (1986). The principal’s impact on student achievement ( Doctoral dissertation). San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, M. L., & Scheerens, J. (2012). Conceptual perspectives on school leadership. In J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235–261. doi:10.3102/0162373711398128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Hallinger, P. (2012). National contexts influencing principals’ time use and allocation: Economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 461–482. doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.678862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 664–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Walker, A., & Ling Chui, Y. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 586–611.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., & Bentler, P. (2004). An EM algorithm for fitting two-level structural equation models. Psychometrika, 69(1), 101–122. doi:10.1007/bf02295842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332–352. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership & Management, 27(2), 179–201. doi:10.1080/13632430701237420
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398. doi:10.1177/0049124194022003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. doi:10.1177/0013161x12456700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Day, K. (1984). The relationship between principal and teacher perceptions of principal instructional management behavior and student achievement ( Doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University, Dekalb, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) of 2008. In O. f. E. C. A. D. (OECD). Ed. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2010). TALIS 2008: Technical Report. Retrieved February 28, 2017, from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/44978960.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orphanos, S., & Orr, M. T. (2014). Learning leadership matters: The influence of innovative school leadership preparation on teachers’ experiences and outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 680–700. doi:10.1177/1741143213502187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printy S., Marks H., & Bowers A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 504–532.
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Ventura, J., Nuechterlein, K. H., & Kim, K. H. (2005). An illustration of multilevel factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(2), 126–136. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8402_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riehl, C., & Firestone, W. A. (2005). What research methods should be used to study educational leadership. A new agenda for research in educational leadership, 156–170.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2012). Summary and conclusion: Instructional leadership in schools as loosely coupled organizations. In J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies (pp. 131–152). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. St. Paul, MN: The Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Tognatta, N. (2013). The impact of distributed leadership on collaborative team decision making. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(2), 101–121. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.810274
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2012). International standard classification of educational: ISCED 2011. Retrieved February 28, 2017, from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A. (2016a). Examining U.S. principal perception of multiple leadership styles used to practice shared instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 152–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A. (2016b). The influence of typologies of school leaders on teacher retention: A multilevel latent class analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 434–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2011). What influences principals’ perceptions of academic climate? A nationally representative study of the direct effects of perception on climate. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 322–348.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014a). The impact of principal perception on student academic climate and achievement in high school: How does it measure up. Journal of School Leadership, 24(2), 386–414.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014b). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A., Wilson, A., Ford, T. G., Frick, W. C., & Wronowski, M. (in press). Testing a framework of math progress indicators for ESSA: How opportunity to learn and instructional leadership matter. Educational Administration Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Ylimaki, R. M., Gurr, D., Moos, L., Kofod, K., & Drysdale, L. (2011). Democratic instructional leadership in Australia, Denmark, and the United States. In R. M. Ylimaki and S. L. Jacobson (Eds.), US and Cross-National Policies, Practices, and Preparation (pp. 51-73). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ylimaki, R., & Jacobson, S. (2013). School leadership practice and preparation: Comparative perspectives on organizational learning (OL), instructional leadership (IL) and culturally responsive practices (CRP). Journal of Educational Administration, 51(1), 6–23.
   Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of educational research, 74(3), 255–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar