Drivers for Change: A Study of Distributed Leadership and Performance Adaptation During Policy Innovation Implementation

References

• Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2013). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40, 48–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, P. D. (2014). Why trust the head? Key practices for transformational leaders to build a purposeful relationship of trust. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 388–409. doi:10.1080/13603124.2013.844275
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing for school improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, M. (2009). Dissecting local design: Instructional leadership, curriculum, and science education ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin..
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation of the Common Core State Standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (Report Series RR-43, iii-41). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coldren, A. F. & Spillane, J. P. (2007). Making connections to teaching practice: The role of boundary practices in instructional leadership. Educational Policy, 21(2), 369–396.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. (2011). Leading organizational learning and capacity building. In K. A. Leithwood, R. M. Ylimaki, & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.), Studies in educational leadership: Vol 12. US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation (pp. 29–49). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F.T., Lawson, H. A., Wilcox, K. C., & Schiller, K. A. (2016). The role of proactive and adaptive district leadership in the adoption and implementation of the Common Core State Standards in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 45–74. doi:l0.1177/001316IX15615391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2016). “Getting to scale…” It seemed like a good idea at the time. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 529–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., & Martinez, M. C. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Brodbeck, F., Heinbokel, T., Mooser, C., Schleiffenbaum, E., & Thiemann, P. (1991). Errors in training computer skills: On the positive function of errors. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 77–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform (pp. 3–4). Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, P. R. (2011). Coleman revisited: School segregation, peers, and frog ponds. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 508–535. doi:10.3102/0002831210392019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R. (2003). Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Educational Policy and Analysis Archives, 11(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlln37/
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., & Clifford, M. (2013). Distributed instructional leadership in high schools. Journal of School Leadership, 23(2), 389–419.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2010). Distributed leadership: Evidence and implications. The Principles of Educational Leadership & Management, 55, 69.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, T. C. (2009). Managing to change: How schools can survive (and sometimes thrive) in turbulent times. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, E., & Benko, S. L. (2014). A “common” vision of instruction? An analysis of English language arts professional development materials related to the Common Core State Standards. English Teaching, 13(1), 169.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, conflicting demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K. (2002). Faculty trust: A key to student achievement. Journal of School Public Relations, 23(2), 88–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, M., Gray, S., & Jeurissen, M. (2016). Principals collaborative roles as leaders for learning. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 168–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, H. W. (2012). Fostering distributed instructional leadership: A sociocultural perspective of leadership development in urban high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 365–390.
   Google Scholar
• Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Hammonds, H. L., & Buskey, F. C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: A post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 111–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., & Portin, B. S. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy–University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, H., Durand, F., Wilcox, K. C., Gregory, K. M., Schiller, K. S., & Zuckerman, S. J. (2017). The role of district and school leaders’ trust and communications in the simultaneous implementation of innovative policies. Journal of School Leadership, 27(1), 31–67.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2016). Department-head leadership for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 117–140. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1044538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. N. (2017). Characteristics of high-performing school districts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(1), 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Jacobson, S. L., & Ylimaki, R. M. (2011). Converging policy trends. In R. M. Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.) US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation (pp. 17–28). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. M., Stephan, D. F., & Szabat, K. A. (2013). Statistics for managers (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Mayrowetz, D., Smiley, M., & Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.) Distributed leadership (pp. 157–180). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & Overturf, B. J. (2012). The common core: Insights into the K–5 standards. The Reading Teacher, 66(2), 153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C. & Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey. Retrieved https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/how-the-worlds-most-improved-school-systems-keep-getting-better
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org
   Google Scholar
• NCES. (n.d.). Identification of rural locales. Retrieved January 8, 2014, from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/rural_locales.asp
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher and coach instructional leadership and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York State Education Department. (2016). EngageNY. Retrieved July 7, 2016, from https://www.engageny.org/
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S. (2014). Multi-dimensional trust: How beginning principals build trust with their staff during leader succession. International Journal of Educational Leadership: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 410–441.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2011). Building a High-quality Teaching Profession: Lessons from Around the World, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common Core Standards: The new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 10). Victoria, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (Vol. 240). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rincón-Gallardo, S., & Fleisch, B. (2016). Bringing effective instructional practice to scale: An introduction. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 379–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, K. S., Durand, F., Wilcox, K. C., & Lawson, H. A. (2015). Identification of “odds-beating” and “typically performing” elementary and middle schools: Sampling methodology report (A report for the New York State Education Department as part of the School Improvement Study). Albany: University at Albany, State University of New York. Retrieved from: http://www.albany.edu/nykids/files/Methods_and_Procedures_CommonCore_es.ms.7.see.addenda.for.survey.FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, K.S., et al. (April, 2017). Professional Learning in a Top-down Curriculum Reform: Districts as Mediators between States and Schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., & Houang, R. (2012). Curricular coherence and the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 294–308. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23272323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2013). Letting the text take center stage: How the Common Core State Standards will transform English language arts instruction. American Educator, 37(3), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A., Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and the development of distributed leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 17(4), 469–503.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H. Meyer, & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87–102). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand educational policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., & Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(5), 533–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Hopkins, M. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: How the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(6), 721–747. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.810783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stosich, E. L. (2016). Joint inquiry: Teachers’ collective learning about the common core in high-poverty urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1698–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. Educational Practices Series–18 International Academy of Education International Bureau of Education. Geneva, Switzerland, Retrieved from http://edu.aru.ac.th/childedu/images/PDF/benjamaporn/EdPractices_18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maele, D., Moolenaar, N. M., & Daly, A. J. (2015). All for one and one for all: A social network perspective on the effects of social influence on teacher trust. In M. DiPaola & W. K. Hoy (Eds.) Leadership and School Quality (pp. 171–196). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wallender, J. (2014). The Common Core State Standards in American public education: Historical underpinnings and justifications. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(4), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. (2011). Phoenix rising: Bringing the Common Core State Mathematics Standards to life. American Educator, 35(3), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, S. J., Wilcox, K. C., Durand, F. T. & Schiller, K. S. (in press). Absorptive capacity in rural schools: Bending not breaking during disruptive policy implementation. Journal of Research in Rural Education.
   Google Scholar