Shared Principalship: The Perspective of Close Subordinate Colleagues

References

• Berntson, E., Wallin, L., & Härenstam, A. (2012). Typical situations for managers in the Swedish public sector: Cluster analysis of working conditions using the Job Demands-Resources Model. International Public Management Journal, 15(1), 100–130. doi:10.1080/10967494.2012.684026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossing, U. (2013). Change agents for school development: Roles and process of implementation. Educational Research in Sweden, 18(3–4), 153–174.
   Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., & Söderström, Å. (2014). A school for every child in Sweden. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model. “A school for all” encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 17–34). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brooking, K., Collins, G., Court, M. R., & O’Neill, J. (2003). Getting below the surface of the principal recruitment “crisis” in New Zealand primary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 47(2), 146–158. doi:10.1177/000494410304700204
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. (2008). The Yew Chung model of dual culture co-principalship: A unique form of distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(2), 191–210. doi:10.1080/13603120701721813
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. (2015). The “Yew Chung model” of international education: The scope for investigation and research. Journal of Research in International Education, 14(3), 258–270. doi:10.1177/1475240915615785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Holmberg, I., Löwstedt, J., & Brommels, M. (2012). Managing clinical integration: A comparative case study in a merged university hospital. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26(4), 486–507. doi:10.1108/14777261211251544
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2002). “Here there is no boss”: Alternatives to the lone(ly) principal. SET: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2003a). Different approaches to sharing school leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2003b). Towards democratic leadership: Co-principal initiatives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 161–183. doi:10.1080/13603120304823
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2004a). Talking back to new public management versions of accountability in education: A co-principalship’s practices of mutual responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(2), 171–194. doi:10.1177/1741143204041883
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2004b). Using narrative and discourse analysis in researching co-principalships. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(5), 579–603. doi:10.1080/0951839042000253612
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2007). Changing and/or reinscribing gendered discourses of team leadership in education? Gender and Education, 19(5), 607–626. doi:10.1080/09540250701535642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Voogt, A., & Hommes, K. (2007). The signature of leadership: Artistic freedom in shared leadership practice. The John Ben Shepperd Journal of Practical Leadership, 2(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.667612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (2007). Organizational learning: Competence-bearing relations and breakdowns of workplace relatonics. In L. Farrell, & T. Fenwick (Eds.), World Year Book of Education 2007: Educating the global workforce; Knowledge, knowledge work and knowledge workers (pp. 141–153). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (2015). Together as one: Shared leadership between managers. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(8), 46–58. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v10n8p46
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Johansson, P., & Wilhelmson, L. (2015). Beyond being present: Learning-oriented leadership in the daily work of middle managers. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(6), 408–425. doi:10.1108/JWL-10-2014-0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., & Backström, T. (2013). Shared leadership. Of managers in collaboration (2 ed.). Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2017). The shared principalship: Invitation at the top. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–19. doi:10.1080/13603124.2017.1321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Vinell, H., & von Knorring, M. (2017). Going beyond “two-getherness”: Nurse managers’ experiences of working together in a leadership model where more than two share the same chair. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2017.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W. (2006). Co-principals: Characteristics of dual leadership teams. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5, 89–107. doi:10.1080/15700760600549596
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W. (2007). The coprincipalship: It’s not lonely at the top. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 313–339.
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2009). The co-principalship: An alternative to the traditional principalship. Planning and Changing, 40(112), 86–102.
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2010). Female traditional principals and co-principals: Experiences of role conflict and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Change, 11(3), 205–219. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9116-z
   Google Scholar
• The Education Act. (SFS 2010: 800).
   Google Scholar
• Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning at work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1006
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, M., Lewis, D., & White, C. (1996). Power sharing at Selwyn College—Auckland, New Zealand: The co-principalship model. Management in Education, 10(4), 32–33. doi:10.1177/089202069601000414
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P., & Hamilton, A. (2004). “A bit more life in the leadership”: Co-principalship as distributed leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 3–35. doi:10.1076/lpos.3.1.3.27842
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, W. N., & Flessa, J. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 518–550. doi:10.1177/0013161X06290641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heenan, D. A., & Bennis, W. (1999). Co-Leaders. The power of great partnerships. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., Ansio, H., & Houni, P. (2015). New variations of dual leadership: Insights from Finnish theatre. International Journal of Arts Management, 17(3), 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. doi:10.1177/1742715011433525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G., Piot, L., & Ballet, K. (2011). The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principals’ work lives. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 93–108. doi:10.1080/03054985.2010.545192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2008). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J. (2006). The talent enigma. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 183–204. doi:10.1080/13603120600741474
   Google Scholar
• Madestam, J. (in press). One principal when the government takes back control: Changes in the Education Act as an expression of metagovernance. Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift, 94(2).
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., Eggen, A., Fuglestad, O., Langfeldt, G., Presthus, A.-M., Skrøvset, S., … Vedøy, G. (2007). Successful leadership based on democratic values. In C. Day, & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change (pp. 71–85). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler, E. E. I. (2002). When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review, 44(4), 65–83. doi:10.2307/41166143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örnberg, Å. (2016). Legal opportunities for the sharing of the principal task in compulsory and secondary school. Journal of Administrative Law, 1 (2016), 141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, S. M. (2003). A study of the co-principalship in two charter schools Dissertations and Theses. Paper 146. South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce, & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership. Volume 1: Policy and practice. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W., & Karambayya, R. (2009). Impact of dual executive leadership dynamics in creative organizations. Human Relations, 62(7), 1073–1112. doi:10.1177/0018726709335539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K., & Bondas, T. (2010). Supporting “two-getherness”: Assumption for nurse managers working in a shared leadership model. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 26, 288–295. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2010.08.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosengren, K., Bondas, T., Nordholm, L., & Nordström, G. (2010). Nurses’ views of shared leadership in ICU: A case study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 26, 226–233. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2010.06.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SOU. (2015). The head teacher and the chain of command. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Government Official Reports. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ethical Review Act. (2003: 460). Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://vr.se/inenglish/ethics/ethicalreview/ethicalreviewofresearchinvolvinghumans.4.7f7bb63a11eb5b697f3800014455.html
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Blackmore, J. (2006). Beyond the power of one: Redesigning the work of school principals. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 161–177. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0003-6
   Google Scholar
• Tyrstrup, M. (2007). Organisational inbetweens—about competence, cooperation and arbitrariness in knowledge-intensive activities Research Paper Series. Stockholm, Sweden: CASL.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L. (2006). Transformative learning in joint leadership. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(7–8), 495–507. doi:10.1108/13665620610693042
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2016a). Joint leadership in schools and pre-schools—a lost potential. In O. Johansson, & L. Svedberg (Eds.), Leading towards the goals of schools (2nd ed., pp. 151–164). Malmö, Sweden: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2016b). Joint principalship: A potential support for democratic practice in schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2017). Experiences of shared leadership in the local school: Principals’ and teacher team leaders’ voices. Educational Research in Sweden, 22(1–2), 101–123.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L., Döös, M., Backström, T., Bellaagh, K., & Hanson, M. (2006). Perspectives on shared leadership in some local government activities. Work Life Report 2006: 50. Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life.
   Google Scholar