Compensation Practices of School Districts When Collective Bargaining Disappears

References

• Dragoset, L., Thomas, J., Herrmann, M., Deke, J., James-Burdumy, S., Graczewski, C., … Giffin, J. (2017). School improvement grants: Implementation and effectiveness (NCEE 2017-4013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., & Ihrke, D. M. (2016). The impact of Wisconsin Act 10 on municipal management in smaller communities: Views from local elected officials. Public Policy and Administration, 1–20. doi:10.1177/0952076716683763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. B., & Han, E. (2012). The war against public sector collective bargaining in the United States. Journal of Industrial Relations, 54, 386–408. doi:10.1177/0022185612442279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., DeArmond, M., & DeBurgomeister, S. (2011). Teacher attitudes about compensation reform: Implications for reform implementation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(3), 441–463. doi:10.1177/001979391106400302
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2010). Using performance on the job to inform teacher tenure decisions. American Economic Review, 100(2), 250–255. doi:10.1257/aer.100.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneman, H. G., III. (1998). Assessment of the motivational reaction of teachers to a school- based performance award program. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(1), 43–59. doi:10.1023/A:1007964516377
   Google Scholar
• Heneman, H. G., III, & Milanowski, A. (2016). A guide to creating teacher-leader positions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, Teacher Incentive Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Heneman, H. G., III, Milanowski, A., & Kimball, S. (2007). Teacher performance pay: Synthesis of plans, research, and guidelines for practice. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, W. K., Willis, C., & Fritz, J. (2015). Collective bargaining agreement provisions in the wake of teacher evaluation system legislation. Educational Policy, 29(1), 18–50. doi:10.1177/0895904814559249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C., Heneman, H. G., III, & Milanowski, A. (2002). Teacher motivation and school-based performance rewards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 372–401. doi:10.1177/0013161X02383004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, G., & Akiba, M. (2015). Characteristics of teacher incentive pay programs: A statewide district survey. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(6), 702–717. doi:10.1108/JEA-09-2013-0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincove, J. A., Barrett, N., & Strunk, K. O. (2015). How do schools pay teachers when there is no union contract: Evidence from New Orleans. Paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Marianno, B. D. (2015). Teachers’ unions on the defensive? How recent collective bargaining laws reformed the rights of teachers. Journal of School Choice, 9(4), 551–557. doi:10.1080/15582159.2015.1079470
   Google Scholar
• Pham, L. D., Nguyen, T. D., & Springer, M. G. (2017, June). Teacher merit pay and student test scores: A meta-analysis. Working Paper. University of Tennessee, Peabody College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Podgursky, M., & Springer, M. E. (2011). Teacher compensation systems in the United States K- 12 public school system. National Tax Journal, 64(1), 165–192. doi:10.17310/ntj.2011.1.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatigorsky, M., Heneman, H. G., III, Steele, C., Finster, M., & Milanowski, A. (2015). Teacher leader programs: Structure and staffing in four TIF districts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, Teacher Incentive Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G. (2009). Rethinking teacher compensation policies: Why now, why again? In M. G. Springer (Ed.), Performance incentives: Their growing impact on American K-12 education (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2012). Schools and staffing survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Vigdor, J. (2008, Fall) Scrap the sacrosanct salary schedule. Education Next, 8(4), 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, A., Chiang, H., Hallgren, K., Speroni, C., Herrmann, M., & Burkander, P. (2016). Evaluation of the Teacher Incentive Fund: Implementation and impacts of pay-for- performance after three years. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, C., & Ingle, W. K. (2016). Profiles of merit pay provisions in Ohio school districts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–37. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1232835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar