Changes in Educational Leadership During A Data-Based Decision Making Intervention

References

• Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292–327. doi:10.1080/15700761003731492
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2013). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling : 3-step approaches using Mplus. Mplus Web Notes: No. 15, 1–48. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bennink, M., Croon, M. A., & Vermunt, J. K. (2013). Micro-macro multilevel analysis for discrete data: A latent variable approach and an application on personal network data. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(4), 431–457. doi:10.1177/0049124113500479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijmolt, T. H. A., Paas, L. J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Country and consumer segmentation: Multi-level latent class analysis of financial product ownership. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(4), 323–340. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 schools and staffing survey and the 2008–2009 principal follow-up survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(3), 237–272. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1047033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(4), 173–206. doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
   Google Scholar
• Copland, M. A., Knapp, M. S., & Swinnerton, J. A. (2009). Principal leadership, data, and school improvement. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education (pp. 153–171). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2012). Leading the ongoing development of collaborative data practices: Advancing a schema for diagnosis and intervention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(1), 26–65. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.577926
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2011). Collaboration and contrived collegiality: Revisiting hargreaves in the age of accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 147–158. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9154-1
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2006). Consider the source: Response differences among teachers, principals and districts on survey questions about their education policy environment. Educational Policy, 20(4), 640–676. doi:10.1177/0895904805284056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, D., & Brayman, C. (2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 62–89. doi:10.1177/0013161X05278186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H., & Camburn, E. (2008). School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 332–352. doi:10.1108/09578230810869275
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Mavrogordato, M., & Haynes, K. T. (2014). Multi-source principal evaluation data: How principals approach, interpret and use teacher feedback regarding their leadership effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, (414), 1–28. doi:10.1177/0013161X14556152
   Google Scholar
• Gorter, R., Fox, J.-P., & Twisk, J. R. (2015). Why item response theory should be used for longitudinal questionnaire data analysis in medical research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0050-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2010). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 271–306. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.536322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S. S., Mandinach, E. B., Supovitz, J. A., & Wayman, J. C. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/dddm_pg_092909.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. doi:10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, A. V. D., Fox, J.-P., & Klein Entink, R. (2015). Bayesian inference for an illness-death model for stroke with cognition as a latent time-dependent risk factor. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(6), 769–787. doi:10.1177/0962280211426359
   Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the data decision mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: Yearbook of the national society of education (pp. 105–131). Malden, MA:Blackwell. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00099.x
   Google Scholar
• Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2012). De staat van het onderwijs: Onderwijsverslag 2010/2011. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2016). De staat van het onderwijs. Onderwijsverslag 2014/2015. [The state of education in the Netherlands: The 2014/2015 Education Report]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (2014). Multi-state modelling with R: The msm package. Version 1.3.2. Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from ftp://218.193.60.3/software/rsoft/msm/doc/msm-manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keuning, T., van Geel, M., & Visscher, A. (2017). Why a data-based decision-making intervention works in some schools and not in others. Learning Disabilities Research And Practice, 32(1). doi: 10.1111/ldrp.2017.32.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). School leadership & management : Seven strong claims about successful school leadership Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 671–706. doi:10.1177/0013161X10377347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J. A., & Datnow, A. (2012). The principal role in data-driven decision making: Using case-study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 179–201. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.599394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., Springer, J., Stuit, D., Lindsay, J., & Wan, Y. (2014). The utility of teacher and student surveys in principal evaluations : An empirical investigation. (REL 2015-047). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
   Google Scholar
• Lukociene, O., Varriale, R., & Vermunt, J. K. (2010). The simultaneous decision(s) about the number of lower- and higher-level classes in multilevel latent class analysis. Social Methodology, 1(40), 247–283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01231.x
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(110301), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2014). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. doi:10.1177/1741143214537229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trend in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1: Analysis. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., Polikoff, M. S., Goldring, E., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & May, H. (2010). Developing a psychometrically sound assessment of school leadership: The VAL-ED as a case study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 135–173. doi:10.1177/1094670510361747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., & Lai, M. K. (2013). Conclusion and a data use framework. In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 177–191). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3
   Google Scholar
• ten Bruggencate, G. C. (2009). Maken schoolleiders het verschil? Onderzoek naar de invloed van schoolleiders op de schoolresultaten (Do school leaders make a difference with respect to school performance?). Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente. doi: 10.3990/1.9789036527835
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. (Educational Practices Series. Number 18). Brussels: International Academy of Education. Retrieved from www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Educational_Practices/EdPractices_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2013). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20, 1–39. doi:10.1177/0013161X13489019
   Google Scholar
• van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J.-P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school-wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. doi: 10.3102/0002831216637346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K. (2003). Multilevel latent class models. Sociological Methodology, 33(Lc), 213–239. doi:10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00131.x
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., Jimerson, J. B., & Spikes, D. D. (2012). District-wide effects on data use in the classroom. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 20(25), 25. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/979
   Google Scholar