Distributed Leadership Practice in Swiss “Eco-Schools” and Its Influence on School Improvement

References

• Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed leadership: A review of literature. National College for School Leadership. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/8534/1/bennett-distributed-leadership-full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berkemeyer, N., Bos, W., Järvinen, H., & van Holt, N. (2011). Unterrichtsentwicklung in schulischen Netzwerken. Analysen aus dem Projekt Schulen im Team. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 1, 115–132. doi:10.1007/s35834-011-0012-2
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, I. (2011). Zwischenräume der Veränderungen. Innovationen und ihr Transfer im Feld von Bildung und Erziehung. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, I. (2013). Wissensbezogene Innovationsanalyse - ein Beitrag zur Erweiterung von Forschungstraditionen. In M. Rürup & I. Bormann (Eds.), Innovationen im Bildungswesen. Analytische Zugänge und empirische Befunde (pp. 89–109). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189x032006003
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2016). What’s policy got to do with it? How the structure-agency debate can illuminate policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 465–475. doi:10.1086/685847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. (2008). Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning, 39(2), 123–139. doi:10.1177/1350507607087578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147–154. doi:10.1177/0892020616665938
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Endres, S., & Weibler, J. (2017). Towards a three-component model of relational social constructionist leadership: A systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(2), 214–236. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler, D., & Sloane, P. F. E. (1998). Implementation als Problem der Modellversuchsforschung. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 26(4), 312–326.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhoff, T., Radisch, F., & Bischof, L. M. (2016). Designs and methods in school improvement research: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 209–240. doi:10.1108/jea-07-2014-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fend, H. (2008). Neue Theorie der Schule. Einführung in das Verstehen von Bildungssystemen (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2008). Triangulation: Eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gräsel, C. (2010). Stichwort: Transfer und Transferforschung im Bildungsbereich. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 13, 7–20. doi:10.1007/s11618-010-0109-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräsel, C., Bormann, I., Schütte, K., Trempler, K., & Fischbach, R. (2013). Outlook on research in education for sustainable development. Policy Futures in Education, 11(2), 115–127. doi:10.2304/pfie.2013.11.2.115
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties. A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317–338. doi:10.1177/0263211X000283006
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 469–485). Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). System redesign for system capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 685–700. doi:10.1108/09578231111174820
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: What we know. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 11–21). Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. doi:10.1177/1741143213497635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & DeFlaminis, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, 30(4), 141–146. doi:10.1177/0892020616656734
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. doi:10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., Ishimaru, A., Holcombe, R., & Fowler, A. (2012). Examining organizational learning in schools: The role of psychological safety, experimentation, and leadership that reinforces learning. Journal of Educational Change, 13, 67–94. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9167-9
   Google Scholar
• Hubers, M. D., Moolenaar, N. M., Schildkamp, K., Daly, A. J., Handelzalts, A., & Pieters, J. M. (2017). Share and succeed: The development of knowledge sharing and brokerage in data teams’ network structures. Research Papers in Education, 33(2), 1–23. doi:10.1080/02671522.2017.1286682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, H. W. (2012). Fostering distributed instructional leadership: A sociocultural perspective of leadership development in urban high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 365–390. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.654886
   Google Scholar
• Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Hammonds, H. L., & Buskey, F. C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: A post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 111–137. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1005028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (2nd ed.). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: The uses and abuses of power. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 581–597. doi:10.1177/1741143213489288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2016). Distributed leadership as fashion or fad. Management in Education, 30(4), 161–167. doi:10.1177/0892020616665065
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2017). Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–15. doi:10.1177/1741143217711190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J. (2009). Distributed leadership: Paradigms, policy, and paradox. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morawska, A., Basha, A., Adamson, M., & Winter, L. (2015). Microanalytic coding versus global rating of maternal parenting behaviour. Early Child Development and Care, 185(3), 448–463. doi:10.1080/03004430.2014.932279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. D., & Hunter, S. (2018). Towards an understanding of dynamics among teachers, teacher leaders, and administrators in a teacher-led school reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9316-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/02680930500391462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 241–256. doi:10.1108/09578230810863299
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). Ways of doing qualitative content analysis: Disentangling terms and terminologies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(1). doi:10.17169/fqs-15.1.2043
   Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K., Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., & Smylie, M. (2013). Making sense of distributed leadership: How secondary school educators look at job redesign. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 1(1), 33–68. doi:10.4471/ijelm.2013.02
   Google Scholar
• Shirley, D. (2016). The new imperatives of educational change: Achievement with integrity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber-Suter, B., Affolter, C., & Nagel, U. (2002). Didaktisches Konzept Umweltbildung. Switzerland: Stiftung Umweltbildung Schweiz/Pestalozzianum Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 115–127. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., & Riggan, M. (2012). Building a foundation for school leadership: An evaluation of the Annenberg Distributed Leadership Project, 2006–2010. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. doi:10.12698/cpre.2012.rr73
   Google Scholar
• Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. doi:10.1177/1741143214558576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar