Changing Organizational Conditions: Experiences of Introducing and Putting Function-Shared Leadership (FSL) into Practice in Schools and Pre-Schools

References

• Anderson, D., & Ackerman Anderson, L. (2010). Beyond change management. How to achieve breakthrough results through conscious change leadership. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses. New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Balogun, J. (2006). Managing change: Steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Planning, 39(1), 29–49. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500. doi:10.1177/002188638702300404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., & Spector, B. (1990). Why change programs don’t produce change. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntson, E. (2019). Chefers arbetsmiljö och nära ledarskap – En enkätstudie om förutsättningar för chefskap i förskola och skola. In L. Wilhelmson & M. Döös (Eds.), Delat ledarskap i förskola och skola. Om täta samarbeten som kräver och ger förutsättningar (pp. 181–196). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Blossing, U. (2013). Change agents for school development: Roles and process of implementation. Educational Research in Sweden, 18(3–4), 153–174. (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., & Söderström, Å. (2014). A school for every child in Sweden. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model. ‘A school for all’ encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 17–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, J. (2010). Organizational design. In J. Bratton, P. Sawchuk, C. Forshaw, M. Callinan, & M. Corbett (Eds.), Work and organizational behaviour (2nd ed., pp. 276–306). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (2006). Administrative reforms as routines. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22(3), 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2006.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Burnes, B. (1996). No such thing as … a “one best way” to manage organizational change. Management Decision, 34(10), 11–18. doi:10.1108/00251749610150649
   Google Scholar
• By, R. T. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369–380. doi:10.1080/14697010500359250
   Google Scholar
• Corin, L., & Björk, L. (2017). Chefers organisatoriska förutsättningar i kommunerna. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (1998). Women challenging managerialism: Devolution dilemmas in the establishment of co-principalships in primary schools in Aotearoa/New Zealand. School Leadership & Management, 18(1), 35–57. doi:10.1080/13632439869763
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2002). “Here there is no boss”: Alternatives to the lone(ly) principal. SET: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Court, M. R. (2003). Towards democratic leadership. Co-principal initiatives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 161–183. doi:10.1080/1360312032000093944
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.667612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle. How we can learn collectively. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (2008). Genom arbetsuppgiftens glasögon - ett uppgiftsperspektiv på organisatoriska förändringsprocesser. In D. Tedenljung (Ed.), Arbetsliv och pedagogik (2nd ed., pp. 69–110). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (2015). Together as one: Shared leadership between managers. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(8), 46–58. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v10n8p46
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Johansson, P., & Wilhelmson, L. (2015a). Beyond being present: Learning-oriented leadership in the daily work of middle managers. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(6), 408–425. doi:10.1108/JWL-10-2014-0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Johansson, P., & Wilhelmson, L. (2015b). Organizational learning as an analogy to individual learning? A case of augmented interaction intensity. Vocations and Learning, 8(1), 55–73. doi:10.1007/s12186-014-9125-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Madestam, J., Wilhelmson, L., & Örnberg, Å. (2018a). The principle of singularity: A retrospective study of how and why the legislation process behind Sweden’s Education Act came to prohibit joint leadership for principals. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2(2–3), 39–55. doi:10.7577/njcie.2757
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2011). Collective learning: Interaction and a shared action arena. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(8), 487–500. doi:10.1108/13665621111174852
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2019a). Att förändra organisatoriska förutsättningar: Erfarenheter av att införa funktionellt delat ledarskap i skola och förskola. Arbetsmarknad & Arbetsliv, 25(2), 46–66. Retrieved from https://journals.lub.lu.se/aoa/article/view/20015/18046
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2019b). Begrepp och tidigare forskning. In L. Wilhelmson & M. Döös (Eds.), Delat ledarskap i förskola och skola. Om täta samarbeten som kräver och ger förutsättningar (pp. 15–43). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2019c). Delat ledarskap - en relevant ledningsform. In L. Wilhelmson & M. Döös (Eds.), Delat ledarskap i förskola och skola. Om täta samarbeten som kräver och ger förutsättningar (pp. 197–216). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2019d). En social innovation tar plats – Huvudmannen inför en ny ledningsform. In L. Wilhelmson & M. Döös (Eds.), Delat ledarskap i förskola och skola. Om täta samarbeten som kräver och ger förutsättningar (pp. 135–157). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2018b). The shared principalship: Invitation at the top. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 344–362. doi:10.1080/13603124.2017.1321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, D. C., & Stace, D. A. (1988). Transformational and coercive strategies for planned organizational change: Beyond the O.D. model. Organization Studies, 9(3), 317–334. doi:10.1177/017084068800900302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W. (2006). Co-principals: Characteristics of dual leadership teams. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 89–107. doi:10.1080/15700760600549596
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W. (2007). The coprincipalship: It’s not lonely at the top. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 313–339. doi:10.1177/105268460701700303
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W. (2018). A case study of the implementation of the co-principal leadership model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 189–203. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1278243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2009). The co-principalship: An alternative to the traditional principalship. Changing and Planning, 40(1/2), 86–102.
   Google Scholar
• The Education Act. (SFS 2010 :800). Stockholm, Sweden: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S., Margalit, D., & Segev, E. (2012). Effects of organizational learning mechanisms on organizational performance and shared mental models during planned change. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(2), 91–102. doi:10.1002/kpm.1384
   Google Scholar
• Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning at work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1006
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2011). How researching learning at work can lead to tools for enhancing learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 181–197). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fejes, A., & Andersson, P. (2009). Recognising prior learning: Understanding the relations among experience, learning and recognition from a constructivist perspective. Vocations and Learning, 2(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/s12186-008-9017-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg, O., & Ohlsson, J. (Eds.). (2011). Organisationspedagogik - en introduktion. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, W. N., & Flessa, J. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 518–550. doi:10.1177/0013161X06290641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, G. (2007). Unpacking unintended consequences in planned organizational change: A process model. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 5–28. doi:10.1177/0893318907301986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. doi:10.1177/1742715011433525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinga, C., Hasson, H., Andreen Sachs, M., & Hansson, J. (2018). Understanding the dynamics of sustainable change: A 20-year case study of integrated health and social care. BMC Health Services Research, 18(400), 1–12. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3061-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, P. (2016). Organisatoriska förutsättningar för kollektivt lärande. In O. Granberg & J. Ohlsson (Eds.), Kollektivt lärande - i arbetslivet (pp. 151–176). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, P. (2018). Kollegialt lärande och konsten att navigera bland begrepp. In N. Rönnström & O. Johansson (Eds.), Att leda skolor med stöd i forskning – Exempel, analyser och utmaningar (pp. 389–416). Stockholm, Sweden: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Leo, U. (2015). Professional norms guiding school principals’ pedagogical leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(4), 461–476. doi:10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, A. (1986). Second-order planned change: Definition and conceptualization. Organizational Dynamics, 15(1), 5–23. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(86)90022-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2019). Novice principals’ attitudes toward support in their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13603124.2018.1543807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Ruiz, M. A., & Hernández-Amorós, M. J. (2019). Principals in the role of Sisyphus: School leadership in challenging times. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–19. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1551551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2013). Team learning: Collective reflection processes in teacher teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(5), 296–309. doi:10.1108/JWL-Feb-2012-0011
   Google Scholar
• Örnberg, Å. (2016). Legal opportunities for the sharing of the principal task in compulsory and secondary school. Journal of Administrative Law, 2016(1), 141–157. (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Pashiardis, P., & Brauckmann, S. (2019). New public management in education: A call for the edupreneurial leader? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(3), 485–499. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1475575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research methods and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, S. M. (2003). A study of the co-principalship in two charter schools.Dissertations and Theses (Paper 146). South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. (1987). The management of strategic change. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership (Vol. 1: Policy and practice). Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Porras, J. I., & Robertson, P. J. (1994). Organizational development: Theory, practice and research. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 719–822). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein Reich, L., Tallberg Broman, I., & Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2017). Professionell yrkesutövning i förskola: Kontinuitet och förändring. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M.-G., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 73–107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skolinspektionen. (2012). Rektors ledarskap med ansvar för den pedagogiska verksamheten (Kvalitetsgranskning Rapport 2012: 1). Stockholm, Sweden: Skolinspektionen.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. doi:10.1080/00131720508984678
   Google Scholar
• Tengblad, S., Berntson, E., & Cregård, A. (Eds.). (2018). Att leda i en komplex organisation. Stockholm, Sweden: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Upsall, D. (2004). Shared principalship of schools. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 13, 143–168.
   Google Scholar
• West, E. L. (1978). The co-principalship: Administrative realism. The High School Journal, 61(5), 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2019). Med uppdelade beslutsmandat – Att arbeta i funktionellt delat ledarskap i förskola och skola. In L. Wilhelmson & M. Döös (Eds.), Delat ledarskap i förskola och skola. Om täta samarbeten som kräver och ger förutsättningar (pp. 159–179). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Yankee, D. K. (2017). A measure of attributes and benefits of the co-leadership model: Is co-leadership the right fit for a complex world? Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC.
   Google Scholar