A Review of Rigor and Ethics in Qualitative Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership Research Articles Published in 1999-2018

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (1st ed., pp. 79–109). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Allmark, P., Boote, J., Chambers, E., Clarke, A., McDonnell, A., Thompson, A., & Tod, A. M. (2009). Ethical issues in the use of in-depth interviews: Literature review and discussion. Research Ethics, 5(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500203
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. L. (1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X90026001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, S. (2007). Ethical issues and qualitative methods in the 21st century: How can digital technologies be embraced in the research community? Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 1, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Barusch, A., Gringeri, C., & George, M. (2011). Rigor in qualitative social work research: A review of strategies used in published articles. Social Work Research, 35(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekhet, A. K., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2018). Beyond qualitative/quantitative structuralism: The positivist qualitative research and the paradigmatic disclaimer. Quality and Quantity, 52(5), 2063–2077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0607-3
   Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2020). Something borrowed, something blue: Reflections on theory borrowing in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2020-0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). Methodological review of studies on educational leaders and emotions (1992-2012): Insights into the meaning of an emerging research field in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. P. (2000). Criteria against ourselves. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600209
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2005). Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530590914789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brounéus, K. (2011). In-depth interviewing: The process skill and ethics of interviews in peace research. In K. Hoglund & M. Oberg (Eds.), Understanding peace research: Methods and challenges (pp. 130–145). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Buijze, A. (2013). The six faces of transparency. Utrecht Law Review, 9(3), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.233
   Google Scholar
• Camfield, L. (2019). Rigor and ethics in the world of big-team qualitative data: Experiences from research in international development. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(5), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell Baez, J. (2021). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (2001). Interpretive interactionism. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (1st ed., pp. 1–41). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). The landscape of qualitative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dongre, A., & Sankaran, R. (2016). Ethical issues in qualitative research: Challenges and options. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 5(6), 1187. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2016.19102015179
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1981). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 10(4), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X010004005
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2006). ‘Rigour’, ‘ethical integrity’ or ‘artistry’? Reflexively reviewing criteria for evaluating qualitative research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(7), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260606900704
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). Managing quality in qualitative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. (2013). Case studies for ethics in academic research in the social sciences. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of the science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (1st ed., pp. 47–78). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Forbat, L., & Henderson, J. (2003). “Stuck in the middle with you”: The ethics and process of qualitative research of two people in an intimate relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 13(10), 1453–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303255836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Science Journal, 5(1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gibton, D. (2016). Researching education policy, public policy, and policymakers – Qualitative methods and ethical issues. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberg, K., Johansson, E., Lindgren, G., & Westman, G. (1994). Scientific rigour in qualitative research—examples from a study of women’s health in family practice. Family Practice, 11(2), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/11.2.176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, B., & Cornelissen, J. (2020). Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 109442812093778. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120937786
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, M. G., Nguyen, J., Casanova, S., Suárez‐Orozco, C., & Saetermoe, C. L. (2013). Doing no harm and getting it right: Guidelines for ethical research with immigrant communities. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2013(141), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howe, K. R., & Moses, M. S. (1999). Ethics in educational research. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 21–59. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. (2010). “Stretching” exercises for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, J., & Finlayson, M. (2006). Navigating uncharted water: Research ethics and emotional engagement in human inquiry. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13(4), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00999.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, E. A. (1998). Social and medical research ethics: Is there a difference? Social Sciences in Health, 4(4), 211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Linden, J. A., Schneider, J. I., Cotter, A., Drexel, S., Frosch, E., Martin, N. D., Canavan, C., Holtman, M., Mitchell, P. M., & Feldman, J. A. (2019). Variability in institutional board review for a multisite assessment of resident professionalism. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619831895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochmiller, C. R., & Lester, J. N. (2017). Conceptualizing practitioner-scholarship for educational leadership research and practice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116668525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, P. K., & Cullum-Swan, B. (1998). Narrative, content, and semiotic analysis. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (1st ed., pp. 463–477). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (1985). Appropriate criteria of trustworthiness and goodness for qualitative research on education organizations. Quality and Quantity, 19(4), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146613
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, N.& Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320(7226), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Corrigan, J. A. (2014). Improving the quality of mixed research reports in the field of human resource development and beyond: A call for rigor as an ethical practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(3), 273–299. 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., & Higgs, J. (2005). Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1853
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2019). Presenting a qualitative study: A reviewer’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quattrone, P. (2006). The possibility of the testimony: A case for case study research. Organization, 13(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramcharan, P., & Cutcliffe, J. R. (2001). Judging the ethics of qualitative research: Considering the ‘ethics as process’ model. Health & Social Care in the Community, 9(6), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00323.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, M. C. (1989). Some ethical implications of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 12(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770120109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Roitenberg, N. (2021). Gaining access to the field in medical ethnography: Reflections on ethical, methodological, and structural challenges in the study of long-term care facilities. Health, 136345932098887. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320988872
   Google Scholar
• Ryan-Nicholls, K., & Will, C. (2009). Rigour in qualitative research: Mechanisms for control. Nurse Researcher, 16(3), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2009.04.16.3.70.c6947
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199312000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2009). Ethics instruction increases graduate students’ responsible conduct of research knowledge but not moral reasoning. Accountability in Research, 16(5), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903190323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X89025004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2008). Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 7(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325008097137
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., Hull, S. C., & Sugarman, J. (2001). Variability among institutional review boards’ decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Critical Care Medicine, 29(2), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200102000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slayton, J., & Samkian, A. (2017). Scaffolding learning for practitioner-scholars: The philosophy and design of a qualitative research methods course. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116663713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, B. L., & Lee, J. S. C. (2020). A reflective account of a research ethics course for an interdisciplinary cohort of graduate students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00200-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolich, M. (2004). Internal confidentiality: When confidentiality assurances fail relational informants. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015546.20441.4a
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, D. P. (1982). Types of harm in social research. In T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace, & L. Walters (Eds.), ethical issues in social science research (pp. 101–124). Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, L. L., Todd, E. M., Mulhearn, T. J., Medeiros, K. E., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017). Qualitative evaluation methods in ethics education: A systematic review and analysis of best practices. Accountability in Research, 24(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1274975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications – Design and methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar