How Do Education Champions Promote School Innovation? The Mediating Role of Boundary Activities

References

• Aalbers, H. L., & Dolfsma, W. (2015). Bridging firm-internal boundaries for innovation: Directed communication orientation and brokering roles. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 36, 97–115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achilladelis, B., Jervis, P., & Robertson, A. (1971). A study of success and failure in industrial innovation. University of Sussex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1998). Rethinking team composition from the outside in. In D. H. Gruenfeld (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 21–37). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoliel, P. & Somech, A. (2015). The role of leader boundary activities inenhancing interdisciplinary team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 46(1), 83 – 124.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. Journal of Management, 17(3), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barczak, G., Kahn, K. B., & Moss, R. (2006). An exploratory investigation of NPD practice in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00221.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoliel, P. (2017). Managing school management team boundaries and school improvement: An investigation of the school leader role. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1053536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction, what empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211223310
   Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 39(11/12), 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018880706172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (2010). Schooling as a knowledge system: Lessons from cramim experimental school. International Mind, Brain, and Education Journal, 4(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrusciel, D. (2008). What motivates the significant/strategic change champion(s)? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810810856408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, R. A., & Szumal, J. L. (1994). The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886394304005
   Google Scholar
• Dalakoura, A. (2010). Differentiating leader and leadership development. Journal of Management Development, 29(5), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011039204
   Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team's innovation: The Role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics, 5, 111–123 .
   Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2010). From an intra-team to an inter-team perspective of effectiveness: The role of inter-team interdependence and teams' boundary activities. Small Group Research: An International Journal of Theory, Investigation, and Application, 41, 142–174 .
   Google Scholar
• Druskat, V., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, O., & Yosef-Hassidim, D. (2012). Managing educational champions: Entrepreneurship in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 22(1), 210–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461202200109
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, P. J., & Egri, C. P. (1991). The political process of innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 229–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131008
   Google Scholar
• George, J. M. (1990). A note on estimating the reliability of categorical data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizational and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05278189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad-Hai, S., & Somech, A. (2016). ‘The day after’: The organizational consequences of innovation implementation in experimental schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(1), 19-40.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, C., Turcotte, S., & Laferrière, T. (2013). Evolution of the conditions for successful innovation in remote networked schools. International Education Studies, 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n3p1
   Google Scholar
• Hendy, J., & Barlow, J. (2012). The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990a). Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organizational Dynamics, 19(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90047-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990b). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., Shea, C. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Shea, C. M. (2001). Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing and champion behavior: Key predictors of project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1810015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Shea, C. M. (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 180–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M. (2005). The right stuff: Identifying and developing effective champions of innovation. Academy of Management Executive, 19(2), 108–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105285144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemison, D. B. (1984). The importance of boundary-spanning roles in strategic decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., & Chang, H. (2000). Internal and external communication, boundary spanning, and innovation adoption: An over-time comparison of three explanations of internal and external innovation communication in a new organizational form. Journal of Business Communication, 37(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360003700303
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 169–211). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to twenty questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organization Resources Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer, R. T., & Delbecq, A. (1978). Organizational/environmental interchange: A model of boundaries spanning activity. Academy of Management Review, 3(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/257575
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., Welsh, M. A., Dehler, G. E., & Green, S. G. (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of product management. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3) , 546–564. doi:10.2307/3069380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Feng, D. (2015). Boundary activities of middle school teacher teams in a global era: Empirical evidence from China. Policy Futures in Education, 14(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315612648
   Google Scholar
• Luz, S., Shadmi, E., Admi, H., Peterfreund, I., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2019a). Characteristics and behaviors of formal versus informal nurse champions and their relationship to innovation success. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, S. K., & Aiman-Smith, L. (2001). Product champions: Truths, myths, and management. Research Technology Management, 44(3), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, S. K., & Griffin, A. (1998). The breakfast of champions: Associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1550436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, S. K. (1998). A longitudinal examination of how champions influence other to support their projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(6), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1560490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, S. K. (2000). Corporate championing and antagonisms forms of political behavior: An R&D perspective. Organization Science, 11(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.429.14599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multi level review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F., Bartel, C., & Kurtzberg, T. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32–62). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, P. M., Elliott, J. G., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2009). Neocolonialism in education: Cooperative learning in an Asian context. Cooperative Education, 45(1), 109–130. doi:10.1080/03050060802661428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, A. E., & Inbar, D. (2003). School principals in the Israeli educational system: From headteachers to professional leaders. In L. E. Watson (Ed.), Selecting and developing heads of schools: Twenty-two European perspectives (pp. 137–148). Hallam University Press, The European Forum on Educational Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Nir, A. E. (2006). Maintaining or delegating authority? Contradictory policy messages and the prospects of school-based management to promote school autonomy. Educational Planning, 15(1), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: Toward an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05285987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeg, J., Skelly, J., Rowan, M., Edwards, N., Davies, B., Grinspun, D., & Downey, A. (2010). The role of nursing best practice champions in diffusing practice guidelines: A mixed methods study. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 7(4), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00202.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagie, A., & Aycan, Z. (2003). A cross cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations. Human Relations, 56(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N. (2016). What makes an “innovation champions”? European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2014-0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fliess, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simaremare, S., Situmorang, M., & Tarigan, S. (2018). Innovative learning material with project to improve students achievement on the teaching of acidbase equilibrium, advances in social science. Education and Humanities Research, 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, 200, 431–436.
   Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 1–26 .
   Google Scholar
• Somech, A ., & Drach-Zahavy, A (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684-708.
   Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Khalaili, A. (2014). Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in therelationship between structural conditions and team innovation. Group & Organization Management, 39, 274–299.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., Cocklin, C., Brown, R., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2011). An investigation of champion-driven leadership processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubin, D. (2009). Planning an innovative school: How to reduce the likelihood of regression toward the mean. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(3), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209102791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L. (1979). Work characteristics and solo unit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, B. N., Rank, J., & Gemünden, H. G. (2014). Corporate innovation culture and dimensions of project portfolio success: The moderating role of national culture. Project Management Journal, 45(6), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first century competences: Exploring dimensions for new curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sciences, 32(5), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Offenbeek, M., & Koopman, P. (1996). Interaction and decision-making in project teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 159–187). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A., Parboteeah, K. P., Riesenhuber, F., & Hoegl, M. (2011). Championship behaviors and innovations success: An empirical investigation of university spin-offs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Eds.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (1999). The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations, 52(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Wu, F., & Henke, J. W. (2015). Leveraging boundary spanning capabilities to encourage supplier investment: A comparative study. Industrial Marketing Management, 49(8), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.012
   Google Scholar