328
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Nurturing a Climate of Innovation in a Didactic Educational System: A Case Study Exploring Leadership in Private Schools in Turkey

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Akkari, A., & Demirtaş, E. (2022). The privatization of education in Turkey from the 2000s: Between educational policies and strategies of local actors. Journal of Educational Studies and Multidisciplinary Approaches (JESMA), 2(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2022.13
  • Alpaykut, S. (2017). Evaluation of student parent’s satisfaction levels from fee-paying schools by structural equation modelling. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İ̇ktisadi İ̇dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(2), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.24988/deuiibf.2017322661
  • Altun Aslan, E. (2019). Private schools in Turkey. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 263–276. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bitlissos/issue/46641/561880
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
  • Amabile, T. M., & Khaire, M. (2008). Creativity and the role of the leader. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 100–109.
  • Ashton, W. B., & Stacey, G. S. (2009). Technical intelligence in business: Understanding technology threats and opportunities. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1995.025615
  • Baker, J. F., & Burns, L. (2010). Creating a culture of innovation. Independent School, 70(1), 62–67.
  • Benoliel, P., & Berkovich, I. (2020). Learning from intelligent failure: An organizational resource for school improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0155
  • Beycioglu, K., & Aslan, M. (2007). The need for organizational innovations in public elementary schools. International Journal of Educational Reform, 16(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678790701600103
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Sage Publications.
  • Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2000). Human capital, social capital, and collective intelligence. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 226–242). Oxford University Press.
  • Burnard, P., & White, J. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802224238
  • Carl, A. E. (2009). Teacher empowerment through curriculum development: Theory into practice. Juta and Company Ltd.
  • Celikoz, M., & Erisen, Y. (2017). Constructivist practice in the curriculum and instruction: The views of lecturers in the field. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.03.012
  • Ceran, S. A., Gungoren, S. C., & Boyacioglu, N. (2014). Determination of scientific creativity levels of middle school students and perceptions through their teachers [special issue]. European Journal of Research on Education, 47–53.
  • Ceyhan, M. A. (2009). Emergence of individualism, entrepreneurialism and creativity in Turkey’s state-run educational system: Anthropological contributions to educational sciences. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.019
  • Chang, J. C., & Yang, Y. L. (2012). The effect of organization’s innovational climate on student’s creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 75–100.
  • Chou, C. M., Shen, C. H., Hsiao, H. C., & Shen, T. C. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative teaching behaviour with information and communication technology (ICT): The mediator role of organisational innovation climate. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1520201
  • Cobanoglu, N. (2021). The relationship between shared leadership, employee empowerment and innovativeness in primary schools: A structural equation modeling. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.327
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
  • Craft, A. (2008). Creativity in the school. Beyond Current Horizons. http://www.beyondcurrenthorizons.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ch3_final_craft_creativityinschool_20081218.pdf
  • Daas, R., Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2020). Teacher’s withdrawal behavior: Examining the impact of principals’ innovative behavior and climate of organizational learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(8), 1339–1355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2019-0449
  • Darabi, A., Arrington, T. L., & Sayilir, E. (2018). Learning from failure: A meta-analysis of the empirical studies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9579-9
  • Doğan, S. (2020). As an educationalist working for a public school, would you send your child to a private school? Private schools in Turkey. Research in Pedagogy, 10(2), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.5937/IstrPed2002417D
  • Durmusoglu, M. C. (2017). Teacher opinions on ministry of national education 2002, 2006, and 2013 preschool education curricula in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(20), 1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3351
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  • Ev, H. (2010). Yapılandırmacılık: Din kültürü ve ahlâk bilgisi dersi için tehdit mi yoksa fırsat mı? [Constructivism: Is it an opportunity or threat for the education of religion and ethics?]. Eğitim-Öğretim ve Bilim Araştırma Dergisi, 6(16), 21–26.
  • Flores-Crespo, P. (2007). Education, employment and human development: Illustrations from Mexico. Journal of Education and Work, 20(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080601143120
  • Fock, H., Hui, M. K., Au, K., & Bond, M. H. (2013). Moderation effects of power distance on the relationship between types of empowerment and employee satisfaction. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112443415
  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. Basic Books.
  • Girginer, N. (2013). A comparison of the healthcare indicators of Turkey and the European Union members countries using multidimensional scaling analysis and cluster analysis. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 28(323), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3848/iif.2013.323.3387
  • Gkorezis, P. (2016). Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 1030–1044. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2015-0113
  • Gülcan, M. G., & Duran, A. (2018). A cross-national analysis of parent involvement in decision-making: Germany, France and Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i11a.3812
  • Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00107
  • Harris, A. (2008). Leading innovation and change: Knowledge creation by schools for schools. European Journal of Education, 43(2), 219–228.
  • Haşiloğlu, M. A., Çalhan, H. S., & Ustaoğlu, M. E. (2020). Determining the views of the secondary school science teachers about the use of social media in education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09820-0
  • Hays, P. S. (2013). Narrowing the gap three key dimensions of site-based leadership in four Boston charter public schools. Education and Urban Society, 45(1), 37–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511404065
  • Hemric, M., Eury, A. D., & Shellman, D. (2010). Correlations between perceived teacher empowerment and perceived sense of teacher self-efficacy. Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 7(1), 37–50.
  • Henrich, C., Ginicola, M. M., & Finn-Stevenson, M. (2006). The school of the 21st century making a difference: Findings from two research studies. Yale University.
  • Hornstra, L., van der Veen, I., Peetsma, T., & Volman, M. (2015). Innovative learning and developments in motivation and achievement in upper primary school. Educational Psychology, 35(5), 598–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.922164
  • Hoşgörür, V. (2016). Views of primary school administrators on change in schools and change management practices. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(6), 2029–2055. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.6.0099
  • Isik, A., Budak, A., Bas, F., & Ozturk, F. (2015). The views of the instructors of elementary mathematics teaching program on constructivist teaching. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(1), 385–400.
  • Kidger, J., Gunnell, D., Biddle, L., Campbell, R., & Donovan, J. L. (2010). Part and parcel of teaching: Secondary school staff’s views on supporting student emotional health and wellbeing. British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903249308
  • Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.007
  • Kizilcelik, S. (2015). An evaluation of the Turkish education system outside the conflict between old and new. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(59), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.9
  • Koch, A. R., Binnewies, C., & Dormann, C. (2015). Motivating innovation in schools: School principals’work engagement as motivator for schools’ innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.958471
  • Kondakci, Y., & Sivri, H. (2014). Salient characteristics of high-performing Turkish elementary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(2), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2012-0136
  • Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Song, H. (2012). Effects of teacher empowerment on teacher efficacy and organizational commitment: A Chinese perspective. Education and Society, 30(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7459/es/30.3.02
  • Leiringer, R., & Cardellino, P. (2011). Schools for the twenty-first century: School design and educational transformation. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 915–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.508512
  • Leithwood, K. (2019). Characteristics of effective leadership networks: A replication and extension. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1470503
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  • Lin, C. S., & Wu, R. Y. W. (2016). Effects of web-based creative thinking teaching on students’ creativity and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1675–1684. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1558a
  • Littledyke, M., & Huxford, L. (1998). Teaching the primary curriculum for constructivist learning. David Fulton Publishers.
  • Louis, K. S., Robinson, V. M., & Seashore Louis, K. (2012). External mandates and instructional leadership: School leaders as mediating agents. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 629–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249853
  • Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2012). Building schools for the future: Transformation for social justice or expensive blunder? British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3001
  • Major, L. E., Eyles, A., & Machin, S. (2020). Generation COVID: Emerging work and education inequalities. Background Paper. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/cepcovid-19-011.pdf
  • McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211416387
  • McWilliam, E. L., & Haukka, S. (2008). Educating the creative workforce: New directions for twenty-first century schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802224204
  • Meng, L. Q., Munoz, M. A., & Wu, D. W. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of effective teaching: A theory-based exploratory study of teachers from China. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 36(3), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1008402
  • Millar, J., & Salt, J. (2006). In whose interests? IT migration in an interconnected world economy. Population, Space and Place, 13(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.442
  • Minna, H., Elena, R., & Timo, P. (2018). Principals promoting entrepreneurship education: The relationships between development activities and school practises. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2), 1–19.
  • Mirzajani, H., Mahmud, R., Ayub, A. F. M., & Wong, S. L. (2016). Teachers’ acceptance of ICT and its integration in the classroom. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 26–40.
  • MoNE. (2021). Ministry of national education statistics 2020-2021. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/resmi-istatistikler/icerik/64
  • Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Cornelissen, F., Liou, Y. H., Caillier, S., Riordan, R., Wilson, K., & Cohen, N. A. (2014). Linked to innovation: Shaping an innovative climate through network intentionality and educators’ social network position. Journal of Educational Change, 15(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4
  • Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10378689
  • Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2011). Ties with potential: Social network structure and innovative climate in Dutch schools. Teachers College Record, 113(9), 1983–2017.
  • Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.010
  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
  • Nichols, M. A. (2007). A study of teacher leadership roles and their association to institutional benefits as perceived by principals and instructional facilitators [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Memphis,
  • Örücü, D., & Arar, K. (2020). Challenges of school principals and teachers in private schools: Comparison of two cases in the Middle East. In K. Arar, D. Örücü, & J. Wilkinson (Eds.), Neoliberalism and education systems in conflict (pp. 13–28). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345135
  • Ozen, H. (2018). A qualitative study of school climate according to teachers’ perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(74), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.5
  • Ozkal-Sayan, I. (2013). Türkiye’de idari sistem ve örgütlenme [Managerial system and organization in Turkey]. http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_34517-1522-12-30.pdf?130529081937
  • Parlar, H., Polatcan, M., & Cansoy, R. (2020). The relationship between social capital and innovativeness climate in schools: The intermediary role of professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2018-0322
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000356
  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Capstone.
  • Robson, D., Hickey, I., & Flanagan, M. (2005, September 14-17). Flights of imagination: Synchronized integration of art and science in the primary school curriculum. Proceedings of the British Educational Research Association (BERA) Annual Conference. University of Glamorgan. www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/143471.doc
  • Sagnak, M. (2012). The empowering leadership and teachers innovative behavior: The mediating role of innovation climate. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1635–1641.
  • Şahin, İ. (2013). The principals of primary schools ideas on their school development strategies and practices. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 242–250.
  • Schoen, L., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 22(1), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807311291
  • Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2009). Leading 21st century schools: Harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Corwin Press.
  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
  • Shaw, A. (2009). Education in the 21st century. Ethos, 17(1), 11–17.
  • Solomon, P. (1997). Discovering information behavior in sense making: I. Time and timing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(12), 1097–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199712)48:12%3C1097:AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-P
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A model of educational leadership: Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120500156088
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Symonds, W. C., Schwartz, R., & Ferguson, R. F. (2011). Pathways to prosperity: Meeting the challenge of preparing young Americans for the 21st century. Pathways to Prosperity Project, Harvard University Graduate School of Education. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4740480
  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.
  • Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2010). Innovating the 21st-century university: It’s time! Educause Review, 45(1), 16–29.
  • Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative teaching behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471.
  • Titrek, O. (2015). The level of innovation management of school principals in Turkey. The Anthropologist, 19(2), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891679
  • Torphy, K., Hu, S., Liu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2020). Teachers turning to teachers: Teacherpreneurial behaviors in social media. American Journal of Education, 127(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/711012
  • Twenge, J. M. (2007). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled–and more miserable than ever before. Free Press.
  • Ucus, S. (2018). Exploring creativity in social studies education for elementary grades: Teachers’ opinions and interpretations. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n2p111
  • Ucus, S., & Acar, I. H. (2018). Teachers’ innovativeness and teaching approach: The mediating role of creative classroom behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(10), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7100
  • Uygun, S. (2003). Türkiye’de dünden bugüne özel okullara bir bakış [A glance at private schools in Turkey from past to today]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1–2), 107–120.
  • Uysal, M. Z., & Cayci, B. (2022). The effect of using Web 2.0 tools in the primary school 4th-grade science course on various variables. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.8.9.1
  • Van Dierendonck, D., & Dijkstra, M. (2012). The role of the follower in the relationship between empowering leadership and empowerment: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1), E1–E20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01022.x
  • Vest, C. M. (2006). Open content and the emerging global meta-university. Educause Review, 41(3), 18–30.
  • Watkins, S., Anthony, A. B., & Beard, K. S. (2020). Principals’ sensemaking of leading under accountability and innovation policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734207
  • Willoughby, T., & Wood, E. (2008). Children’s learning in a digital world. Blackwell
  • Yildirim, A., & Kasapoglu, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of constructivist curriculum change as a predictor of their perceptions of the implementation of constructivist teaching–learning activities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9394-5
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
  • Yirci, R., & Aydoğar, N. (2020). Comparison of innovation management skills of public and private school administrators: A quantitative research. İ̇stanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(39), 1286–1308. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.804129
  • Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: The role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2
  • Zuckerman, S. J., Wilcox, K. C., Durand, F. T., Lawson, H. A., & Schiller, K. S. (2018). Drivers for change: A study of distributed leadership and performance adaptation during policy innovation implementation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(4), 618–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1384500

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.