Publication Cover
CoDesign
International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts
Volume 8, 2012 - Issue 4: Perspectives on quality of collaboration in design
2,097
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Professional perspectives on collaborative design work

Pages 215-230 | Received 17 Oct 2011, Accepted 25 Sep 2012, Published online: 01 Nov 2012

References

  • Adams , R. 2009 . “ Exploring the boundaries: language, roles and structures in cross-disciplinary design teams ” . In About designing: analysing design meetings , Edited by: McDonnell , J.T. and Lloyd , P. 339 – 358 . Leiden : CRC Press/Balkema .
  • Adelson , B. 1999 . Developing strategic alliances: a framework for collaborative negotiation in design . Research in Engineering Design , 11 : 133 – 144 .
  • Anderl , R. 2009 . A contribution to engineering data sharing in discipline spanning global environments . CoDesign , 5 : 159 – 174 .
  • Arias , E. 2000 . Transcending the individual human mind – creating shared understanding through collaborative design . ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) , 7 ( 1 )
  • Austin , S. 2001 . Mapping the conceptual design activity of interdisciplinary teams . Design Studies , 22 : 211 – 232 .
  • Ball , L.J. and Christensen , B.T. 2009 . Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution . Design Studies , 30 : 169 – 186 .
  • Bhaskar , R. 1979 . The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences , Brighton : Harvester Press .
  • Bhaskar , R. 2008 . A realist theory of science , Hoboken, NJ : Taylor & Francis .
  • Brereton , M. 1996 . “ Collaboration in design teams: how social interaction shapes the product ” . In Analysing design activity , Edited by: Cross , N. , Christiaans , H. and Dorst , K. 319 – 341 . Chichester : Wiley .
  • Brown , J.S. and Duguid , P. 1991 . Organizational learning and communities-of–practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation . Organization Science , 2 : 40 – 57 .
  • Brown , J.S. and Duguid , P. 2001 . Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective . Organization Science , 12 : 198 – 213 .
  • Brown , S.L. and Eisenhardt , K.M. 1995 . Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions . Academy of Management Review , 20 : 343 – 378 .
  • Bucciarelli , L.L. 1994 . Designing engineers , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
  • Castellan , N.J. and ed . 1993 . Individual and group decision making: current issues , Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
  • Catledge , L.D. and Potts , C. 1996 . Collaboration during conceptual design , Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press .
  • Chakrabarti , A. and Blessing , L.T.M. 2009 . DRM, a design research methodology , Dordrecht : Springer .
  • Conklin , E.J. and Yakemovic , K.C.B. 1991 . A process-oriented approach to design rationale . Human–Computer Interaction , 6 : 357 – 391 .
  • Crabtree , R.A. , Fox , M.S. and Baid , N.K. 1997 . Case studies of coordination activities and problems in collaborative design . Research in Engineering Design , 9 : 70 – 84 .
  • Cross , N. 1984 . Developments in design methodology , Chichester : Wiley .
  • Cross , N. and Cross , A.C. 1995 . Observations of teamwork and social processes in design . Design Studies , 16 : 143 – 170 .
  • Cross , N. , Christiaans , H. and Dorst , K. 1996 . Analysing design activity , Chichester : Wiley .
  • Danermark , B. 2001 . Explaining society: an introduction to critical realism in the social sciences , Haboken : Taylor & Francis .
  • Delanda , M. 2006 . A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity , London : Continuum .
  • Détienne , F. , Martin , G. and Lavigne , E. 2005 . Viewpoints in co-design: a field study in concurrent engineering . Design Studies , 26 : 215 – 241 .
  • Dorst , K. 2008 . Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen . Design Studies , 29 : 4 – 11 .
  • Dorst , K. and Cross , N. 2001 . Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution . Design Studies , 22 : 425 – 437 .
  • Durbin , P.T. 1989 . Philosophy of technology: practical, historical, and other dimensions , Dordrecht : Kluwer .
  • Dwarakanath , S. and Blessing , L. 1996 . “ Ingredients of the design process: a comparison between group and individual work ” . In Analysing design activity , Edited by: Cross , N. , Christiaans , H. and Dorst , K. 93 – 116 . Chichester : Wiley .
  • Geisler , C. and Rogers , E.H. 2000 . Technological mediation for design collaboration . ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication , : 395 – 405 .
  • Gernsbacher , M.A. , Derry , S.J. and Schunn , C.D. 2005 . Interdisciplinary collaboration , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
  • Girard , P. and Robin , V. 2006 . Analysis of collaboration for project design management . Computers in Industry , 57 : 817 – 826 .
  • Glaser , B.G. and Strauss , A.L. 1970 . The discovery of grounded theory , Harmondsworth : Penguin Education .
  • Goldschmidt , G. 1995 . The designer as a team of one . Design Studies , 16 : 189 – 209 .
  • Grant , D.P. , Cross , N. and Vries , M.D. 1993 . Design methodology and relationships with science , Dordrecht; , Boston : Kluwer Academic .
  • Gunther , J. , Frankenberger , E. and Auer , P. 1996 . “ Investigation of individual and team design processes ” . In Analysing design activity , Edited by: Cross , N. , Christiaans , H. and Dorst , K. 117 – 132 . Chichester : Wiley .
  • Hallberg , L.R.-M. 2006 . The ‘core category’ of grounded theory: making constant comparisons . International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being , 1 : 141 – 148 .
  • Hammersley , M. 2002 . “ Ethnography and realism ” . In The qualitative researcher's companion , Edited by: Huberman , A.M. and Miles , M.B. 65 – 80 . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
  • Hammersley , M. and Atkinson , P. 2007 . Ethnography: principles in practice , London : Taylor & Francis .
  • Hughes , J.A. , Randall , D. and Shapiro , D. 1992 . From ethnographic record to system design . Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 1 : 123 – 141 .
  • Jiang , H. and Yen , C.-C. Protocol analysis in design research: a review . Design | Rigor & Relevance, International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) 2009 conference . October 18–22 .
  • Kleinsmann , M. , Valkenburg , R. and Buijs , J. 2007 . Why do(n't) actors in collaborative design understand each other? An empirical study towards a better understanding of collaborative design . CoDesign , 3 : 59 – 73 .
  • Lave , J. and Wenger , E. 1991 . Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Lewis , B.N. 1964 . “ Communication in problem-solving groups ” . In Conference on design methods , Edited by: Jones , J.C. and Thornley , D.G. 169 – 184 . New York : Macmillan .
  • Matthews , B. 2009 . Intersections of brainstorming rules and social order . CoDesign , 5 : 65 – 76 .
  • McDonnell , J. 2009 . Collaborative negotiation in design: a study of design conversations between architect and building users . CoDesign , 5 : 35 – 50 .
  • McDonnell , J. 2012 . Accommodating disagreement: a study of effective design collaboration . Design Studies , 33 : 44 – 63 .
  • Mills , J. , Bonner , A. and Francis , K. 2006 . Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: implications for research design . International Journal of Nursing Practice , 12 : 8 – 13 .
  • Nonaka , I. and Takeuchi , H. 1995 . The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation , New York : Oxford University Press .
  • Oak , A. 2011 . What can talk tell us about design?: Analyzing conversation to understand practice . Design Studies , 32 : 211 – 234 .
  • Olson , G.M. 1992 . Small group design meetings: an analysis of collaboration . Human–Computer Interaction , 7 : 347 – 374 .
  • Ostergaard , K. 2005 . An experimental methodology for investigating communication in collaborative design review meetings . CoDesign , 1 : 169 – 185 .
  • Peng , C. 1994 . Exploring communication in collaborative design: co-operative architectural modelling . Design Studies , 15 : 19 – 44 .
  • Perry , M. 1998 . Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts . Design Studies , 19 : 273 – 288 .
  • Simoff , S. 2000 . Analysing participation in collaborative design environments . Design Studies , 21 : 119 – 144 .
  • Simon , H.A. 1973 . The structure of ill structured problems . Artificial Intelligence , 4 : 181 – 201 .
  • Smulders , F. , Lousberg , L. and Dorst , K. 2008 . Towards different communication in collaborative design . International Journal of Managing Projects in Business , 1 : 352 – 367 .
  • Sonnenwald , D.H. 1996 . Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process . Design Studies , 17 : 277 – 301 .
  • Tang , H.H. , Lee , Y.Y. and Gero , J.S. 2011 . Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: a protocol study using the function–behaviour–structure coding scheme . Design Studies , 32 : 1 – 29 .
  • Tang , J.C. 1991 . Findings from observational studies of collaborative work . International Journal of Man–Machine Studies , 34 : 143 – 160 .
  • Valkenburg , R. and Dorst , K. 1998 . The reflective practice of design teams . Design Studies , 19 : 249 – 271 .
  • Vande Moere , A. , Dong , A. and Clayden , J. 2008 . Visualising the social dynamics of team collaboration . CoDesign , 4 : 151 – 171 .
  • Vinck , D. and Blanco , E. 2003 . Everyday engineering: an ethnography of design and innovation , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
  • Wenger , E. 1999 . Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.