Demonstration of software concepts to multiple stakeholders using modular abstract prototyping

References

• Bertrand , J. T. , Brown , J. E. and Ward , V. M. 1992 . Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data . Evaluation Review , 16 ( 2 ) : 198 – 209 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles , C. and Box , J. 2011 . Undercover User Experience Design , Berkeley, CA : New Riders .
   Google Scholar
• Brandt , E. and Messeter , J. 2004 . “ Facilitating Collaboration Through Design Games ” . In Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration , 121 – 131 . New York : ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Constantine , L. 1998 . Rapid Abstract Prototyping . Software Development , 6 ( 10 )
   Google Scholar
• Constantine , L. 2003 . “ Canonical Abstract Prototypes for Abstract Visual and Interaction Design ” . In DSV-IS 1 – 15 . Madeira, Portugal
   Google Scholar
• Constantine , L. 2005 . “ Users, Roles, and Personas ” . In The Persona Lifecycle , Edited by: Pruitt , J. and Aldin , T. 1 – 18 . San Francisco, CA : Morgan-Kaufmann .
   Google Scholar
• Cooprider , J. G. and Henderson , J. C. 1990 . Technology–Process Fit: Perspectives on Achieving Prototyping Effectiveness . Journal of Management Information Systems , 7 ( 3 ) : 67 – 87 .
   Google Scholar
• Crossman, A. 2013. “Statistical Software Programs for Use with Qualitative Data.” http://sociology.about.com/od/Research-Tools/a/Computer-programs-qualitative-data.htm
   Google Scholar
• Davis , R. C. , Saponas , T. S. , Shilman , M. and Landay , J. A. 2007 . “ SketchWizard: Wizard of Oz Prototyping of Pen-Based User Interfaces ” . In Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , 1 – 10 . New York : ACM . Newport, RI, USA
   Google Scholar
• Derboven , J. , De Roeck , D. and Verstraete , M. 2010 . “ Comparing User Interaction with Low and High Fidelity Prototypes of Tabletop Surfaces ” . In 6th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries , 148 – 157 . New York : ACM . Reykjavik, Iceland
   Google Scholar
• Dow , S. P. , Heddleston , K. and Klemmer , S. R. 2009 . “ The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints ” . In C&C’09 , 165 – 174 . Berkeley, CA, USA : New York: ACM .
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois , E. and Horváth , I. 2011 . “ Abstract Prototyping in software Engineering: A Review of Approaches ” . In ICED11 , Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen 1 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois , E. and Horvath , I. 2012 . “ An Easy-to-Use Methodological Proposal for Considering Ubiquitous Controllers in Energy Use Optimization ” . In Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society , Edited by: Matsumoto , M. , Umeda , Y. , Masui , K. and Fukushige , S. 344 – 349 . Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Galin , D. 2004 . Software Quality Assurance: From Theory to Implementation , Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Hakim , J. and Spitzer , T. 2000 . “ Effective Prototyping for Usability ” . In IEEE Professional Communication Society Conference , 47 – 54 . Cambridge, MA : IEEE Educational Activities .
   Google Scholar
• Horváth , I. 2011 . “ Theoretical Framework for Comprehensive Abstract Prototyping Methodology ” . In Proceedings of the ICED11 , Edited by: Culley , S. J. , Hicks , B. J. , McAloone , T. C. , Howard , T. J. and Reich , Y. 108 – 119 . Copenhagen, Denmark : The Design Society .
   Google Scholar
• Horváth , I. , Rusák , Z. , Martin , E. H. , van der Vegte , W. F. , Kooijman , A. , Opiyo , E. Z. and Peck , D. 2011 . “ An Information Technological Specification of Abstract Prototyping for Artifact and Service Combinations ” . In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Washington, DC, USA August 28–31
   Google Scholar
• Klemmer , S. R. , Sinha , A. K. , Chen , J. , Landay , J. A. , Aboobaker , N. and Wang , A. 2000 . “ Suede: A Wizard of Oz Prototyping Tool for Speech User Interfaces ” . In 13th Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , 1 – 10 . New York : ACM . San Diego, CA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan , V. and Ulrich , K. T. 2001 . Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature . Management Science , 47 ( 1 ) : 1 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger , R. A. and Casey , M. A. 2000 . Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 3rd ed. , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Kyng , M. 1995 . Making Representations Work . Communications of the ACM , 38 ( 9 ) : 46 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landay , J. A. 1996 . Interactive Sketching for the Early Stages of User Interface Design , Pittsburgh, PA : School of Computer Science, Computer Science Division, Carnegie Mellon University .
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong , P. 2011 . “ Focus Group Methodology: Introduction and History ” . In Focus Group Methodology: Principle and Practice , 224 Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Lim , Y. -K. , Stolterman , E. and Tenenberg , J. 2008 . The Anatomy of Prototypes: Prototypes as Filters, Prototypes as Manifestations of Design Ideas . ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction , 15 ( 2 ) : 1 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin , J. , Newman , M. W. , Hong , J. I. and Landay , J. A. 2000 . “ DENIM: Finding a Tighter Fit Between Tools and Practice for Web Site Design ” . In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 510 – 517 . New York : ACM . The Hague, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Liu , L. and Khooshabeh , P. 2003 . “ Paper or Interactive? A Study of Prototyping Techniques for Ubiquitous Computing Environments ” . In CHI ‘03 Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1030 – 1031 . New York : ACM . Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
   Google Scholar
• Maguire , M. 2001 . Methods to Support Human-Centred Design . International Journal of Human–Computer Studies , 55 ( 4 ) : 587 – 634 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald , H. E. IV . 2010 . “ How Mock-Ups, a Key Engineering Tool, Help to Promote Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education ” . In NASA USRP – Internship Final Report , Johnson Space Center, NASA .
   Google Scholar
• Memmel , T. , Gundelsweiler , F. and Reiterer , H. 2007 . “ Agile Human-Centered Software Engineering ” . In Proceedings of the People and Computers XXI – HCI edited by J. Linden, M. A. S. Ball, C. Sas, T. C. Ormerod, A. Dix, P. Bagnall, and T. McEwan, 167–175
   Google Scholar
• Opiyo, E. Z., I. Horvath, and J. S. M. Vergeest. 2001a. “Developing Software Tools for Pre-implementation Testing of Design Support Tools.” In Proceedings of the MicroCAD 2001 International Scientific Conference, edited by L. Icalmar and G. Patko, 1–8. Miskolc: University of Miskolc, Miskolc
   Google Scholar
• Opiyo , E. Z. , Horvath , I. and Vergeest , J. S. M. 2001b . “ Knowledge Representation and Processing in Abstract Prototyping of Design Support Tools ” . In Proceedings of the Design Research – Theories, Methodologies and Product Modelling, 13th International Conference on Engineering Design , Bury St Edmunds : Professional Engineering Publishing ltd . Glasgow, edited by S. Culley, 469–476.
   Google Scholar
• de Sá , M. and Carriço , L. 2009 . “ A Mobile Tool For In-Situ Prototyping ” . In 11th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services 1 – 4 . New York: ACM
   Google Scholar
• Sauer , J. , Franke , H. and Ruettinger , B. 2008 . Designing Interactive Consumer Products: Utility of Paper Prototypes and Effectiveness of Enhanced Control Labelling . Applied Ergonomics , 39 ( 1 ) : 71 – 85 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefelin , R. , Tscheligi , M. and Giller , V. 2003 . “ Paper Prototyping – What is it Good for? A Comparison of Paper- and Computer-Based Low-Fidelity Prototyping ” . In CHI ‘03 Human Factors in Computing Systems 778 – 779 . New York: ACM
   Google Scholar
• Shao , G. and Hanna , W. 1990 . “ Soft Prototyping in the Design of Military Electronics ” . In Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 1990 729 – 735 . Dayton, OH, USA
   Google Scholar
• Snyder , C. 2003 . Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces (Interactive Technologies) , San Francisco, CA : Morgan Kaufmann .
   Google Scholar
• Tideman , M. , van der Voort , M. C. and van Houten , F. J. A. M. 2008 . A New Product Design Method Based on Virtual Reality, Gaming and Scenarios . International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing , 2 ( 4 ) : 195 – 205 .
   Google Scholar
• Walker , M. , Takayama , L. and Landay , J. A. 2002 . High-Fidelity or Low-Fidelity, Paper or Computer Choosing Attributes When Testing Web Prototypes . In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings , 46 ( 5 ) : 661 – 665 .
   Google Scholar
• Wiegers , K. E. 1999 . Software Requirements , Redmond, WA : Microsoft Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wood , D. P. and Kang , K. C. 1992 . A Classification and Bibliography of Software Prototyping. Requirements Engineering Project , Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University .
   Google Scholar
• Yang , M. C. 2005 . A Study of Prototypes, and Design Outcome . Design Studies , 26 ( 6 ) : 649 – 669 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar