Keep, lose, change: Prompts for the re-design of product concepts in a focus group setting

REFERENCES

• Atkinson, J. M., and J.Heritage, eds. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., and S.Kirk. 2000. “Running Focus Groups with Elderly and Disabled Elderly Participants.” Applied Ergonomics31: 621–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J.2012. “The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of ‘Research Through Design’.” In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS) 2012, 68–77. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, J., R.Coleman, S.Keates, and C.Lebbon, eds. 2003. Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbilek, O., and H.Demirkan. 2004. “Universal Product Design Involving Elderly Users: A Participatory Design Model.” Applied Ergonomics35 (4): 361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohlich, D. M., T.Clancy, J.Robinson, and E.Costanzo. 2004. “The Audiophoto Desk.” In Proceedings of 2AD: Second International Conference on Appliance Design, 139. Bristol: HP.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., and J.Bowers. 2012. “Annotated Portfolios.” Interactions Magazine19 (4): 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., and H.Martin. 2000. “Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances Through Conceptual Design Proposals.” In Proceedings of SIGCHI 2000, 209–216. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J.1994. “The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction Between Research Participants.” Sociology of Health and Illness16: 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, V., J.Näsänen, and R.Sarvas. 2009. “‘A Little Silly and Empty-Headed’: Older Adults' Understandings of Social Networking Sites.” In Proceedings of the 23rd BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 45–54. Cambridge: British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. S. C., D. M.Frohlich, and A.Ahmed. 2011. “Supporting Memory and Identity in Older People: Findings from a ‘Sandpit’ Process.” In Proceedings of Include 2011, 1–10. London: Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, S. E., R.Harper, and A.Sellen. 2009. “Desiring to Be in Touch in a Changing Communications Landscape: Attitudes of Older Adults.” In Proceedings of CHI 2009, 1693–1702. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., D.Jackson, G.Schofield, and P.Olivier. 2012. “Engaging Older People Using Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of CHI 2012, 1119–1208. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R.2007. “Learning to Talk to Users in Participatory Design Situations.” Design Studies28 (3): 217–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, H., and B.Gaver. 2000. “Beyond the Snapshot from Speculation to Prototypes in Audiophotography.” In Proceedings of DIS 2000, 55–65. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K.1987. “The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities.” Public Opinion Quarterly51 (4): 550–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L.1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology22: 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, M. J.2008. “Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI (revised).” In Human–Computer Interaction: Development Process, edited by J.Jacko, and A.Sears, 1061–1081. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., J.Arnott, A.Carmichael, and M.Morgan. 2007. “Methodologies for Involving Older Adults in the Design Process.” In Proceedings of HCII 2007, 5, 982–989. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. J.Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, P., and B.Gaver. 2006. “Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation.” In Proceedings of DIS 2006, 99–108. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, J. F., and M.Marsh. 2000. “Scenario Building as an Ergonomics Method in Consumer Product Design.” Applied Ergonomics31 (2): 151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines, J., M.Blythe, P.Dunphy, V.Vlachokyriakos, I.Teece, A.Monk, and P.Olivier. 2012a. “Cheque Mates: Participatory Design of Digital Payments with Eighty Somethings.” In Proceedings of CHI 2012, 1189–1198. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, J., R.Clarke, T.Leong, J.McCarthy, O. S.Iversen, P.Wright, and P.Olivier. 2012b. “Invited SIG – Participation and HCI: Why Involve People in Design?” Proceedings of CHI EA 2012, 1217–1220. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E.2006. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wulz, F.1990. “The Concept of Participation.” Design Studies, 7 (3): 153–162.
   Google Scholar