A field test and its displacements. Accounting for an experimental mode of industrial innovation

References

• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002a. “The Key to Success in Innovation Part I: The Art of Interessement.” International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (2): 187–206.10.1142/S1363919602000550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002b. “The Key to Success in Innovation Part II: The Art of Choosing Good Spokespersons.” International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (2): 207–225.10.1142/S1363919602000562
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 1999. “Demonstrations: Sites and Sights of Direct Action.” Economy and Society 28 (1): 75–94.10.1080/03085149900000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaume, R., and C. Midler. 2009. “From Technology Competition to Reinventing Individual Ecomobility: New Design Strategies for Electric Vehicles.” International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 9 (2): 174–190.10.1504/IJATM.2009.026396
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1980. “The State and Technical Innovation: A Case Study of the Electric Vehicle in France.” Research Policy 9 (4): 358–376.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1987. Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by W. Bijker and T. Pinch, 83–103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. 2012. Beyond Smart Cities: How Cities Network, Learn and Innovate. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. 2013. “Generating Publics through Design Activity.” In Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, edited by W. Gunn, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith, 199–215. London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J., and D. Pontille. 2015. “Material ordering and the care of things.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (3): 338–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2007. Essays in Experimental Logic. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2012. The Public and its Problems. An Essay in Political Inquiry. University Park, PN: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. 2014. “Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 30–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., and L. Hakkarainen. 2014. “What difference does a living lab make? Comparing two health technology innovation projects.” CoDesign 10 (3–4): 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., and B. Van Heur. 2014. “Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 379–392.10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World.” In Science Observed, edited by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 143–170. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. 2011. “Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 649–666.10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., and J. Hassard, eds. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A., and C. DiSalvo. 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–264.10.1177/0306312712471581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J. 2007. “A Market of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups.” The Sociological Review 55 (s2): 130–151.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00733.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., and F. Rizzo. 2011. “Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137029669
   Google Scholar
• Millo, Y., and J. Lezaun. 2006. “Regulatory Experiments: Genetically Modified Crops and Financial Derivatives on Trial.” Science and Public Policy 33 (3): 179–190.10.3152/147154306781779046
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2005. “The Work of Economics: How a Discipline Makes its World.” European Journal of Sociology 46 (2): 297–320.10.1017/S000397560500010X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A., and J. Law. 1994. “Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology.” Social Studies of Science 24 (4): 641–671.10.1177/030631279402400402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., and M. Callon. 2007. “Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 163–189. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. 1993. “’Testing-One, Two, Three ... Testing!’: Toward a Sociology of Testing.” Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (1): 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Expérimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. 2014. “Faire circuler des vélos et des personnes. Ecologie urbaine et maintenance du programme Vélib’ de Paris” [Making bicycles and people circulate. Urban ecology and the maintenance of the Paris Vélib' program]. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 8 (1): 179–219.
   Google Scholar
• Tironi, M., and Criado Sánchez. 2015. “Of Sensors & Sensitivities: Towards a Cosmopolitics of ‘Smart Cities’?” Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 6 (1): 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51 (5): 883–898.10.1177/0042098013494427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villareal, A. 2011. “The Social Construction of the Market for Electric Cars in France: Politics Coming to the Aid of Economics.” International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 11 (4): 326–339.10.1504/IJATM.2011.043165
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie, A., and M. Michael. 2009. “Expectation and Mobilisation: Enacting Future Users.” Science, Technology and Human Values 34 (4): 502–522.10.1177/0162243908329188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar