Notes on ANT for designers: ontological, methodological and epistemological turn in collaborative design

References

• Berg, M. 1997. Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-Support Techniques and Medical Practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. 1998. “The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design.” Science, Technology & Human Values 23 (4): 456–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and Democratizing Innovation.” In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, ACM, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. 1992. “The Politics of Formalism.” Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication 232–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., S. Star, and W. Turner, eds. 1997. Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Traslation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St Brieuc Bay’; Law J., Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2004. “The Role of Hybrid Communities and Socio-Technical Arrangements in the Participatory Design.” Journal of the Centre for Information Studies 5 (3): 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barther. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World, An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., I. Nourbakhsh, D. Holstius, A. Akin, and M. Louw. 2008. “The Neighborhood Networks Project: A Case Study of Critical Engagement and Creative Expression Through Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the PDC, Indiana University, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., T. Lodato, L. Fries, B. Schechter, and T. Barnwell. 2011. “The Collective Articulation of Issues as Design Practice.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., and J. Bowers. 2012. “Annotated Portfolios.” Interactions 19 (4): 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 1996. “Modest Witness: Feminist Diffractions in Science Studies.” In The Disunity of the Sciences: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David. J. Stamp, 428–441. Stanford, California: Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. 1991. “Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering.” Science, Technology & Human Values 16 (4): 448–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. 2006. “The Wireless Nursing Call System: Politics of Discourse, Technology and Dependability in a Pilot Project.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15 (5–6): 419–441.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. 2008. “CSCW Design Reconceptualised Through Science Studies.” In Cognition, Communication and Interaction, 132–147. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Tehnology/Building Society, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004a. “On Using ANT for Studying Information Systems: A (somewhat) Socratic Dialogue.” In The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors and Contexts, edited by C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra, and F. Land, 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004b. The Politics of Nature. Harvard: Hardvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2008. “A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design.” In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Design History Society, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2011b. “From Multiculturalism to Multinaturalism: What Rules of Method for the New Socio-Scientific Experiments?” Nature and Culture 6 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2012. “Waiting for Gaia. Composing the Common World through Arts and Politics.” Equilibri 16 (3): 515–538.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and P. Weibel, eds. 2005. Making Things Public, Atmosphere of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. 2013. Digital Methods. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., E. Brandt, and T. Binder. 2010. “A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the PDC, ACM, 195–198.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L, and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and K. Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward An Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2010. Cosmopolitics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, C. 2012. Unpacking Design Practices: The Notion of Things in the Making of Artifacts, in Science, Technology and Human Values 37 (1): 88–123.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, C. 2014a. “The Problem of De-sign as Conjuring: Empowerment-in-use and the Politics of Seams, Full Paper.” In Proceedings of PDC, Oct 11–14 0.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, C. 2014b. “Diabetes Self-Care in-the-Wild: Design Challenges for Personal Health Record Systems and Self-Monitoring Technologies.“ Information Technology & People 27 (4): 397–420.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2000. “Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-building.” Organization 7 (2): 311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2007. Human-machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telier, A., T. Binder, G. De Michelis, P. Ehn, G. Jacucci, and I. Wagner. 2011. Design Things. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. 2010. “Diving in Magma: How to Explore Controversies with Actor-Network Theory.” In Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. 2012. “Building on Faults: How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods.” Public Understanding of Science 21 (7): 796–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., D. Ricci, M. Mauri, L. Kimbell, and A. Meunier. 2015. “Designing Controversies and their Publics.” Design Issues 31 (3)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, M., and A. Wilkie. 2008. “Made in Critical Land: Designing Matters of Concern.” In Networks of Design: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Design History Society, Falmouth, 3–6 Sept.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2009. “Making the Social Hold: Towards an Actor-Network Theory of Design.” Design and Culture 1 (3): 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderent-Jerak, T., and C. Bruun Jensen. 2007. “Editorial Introduction: Unpacking ‘Intervention'in Science and Technology Studies.” Science as Culture 16 (3): 227–235.
   Google Scholar