‘Throw one out that’s problematic’: performing authority and affiliation in design education

References

• Arundale, R. 2006. “A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2): 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Arundale, R. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2078–2105.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
   Google Scholar
• Attenborough, F., and E. Stokoe. 2012. “Student Life; Student Identity; Student Experience: Ethnomethodological Methods for Pedagogical Matters.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 11 (1): 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Belhiah, H. 2009. “Tutoring as an Embodied Activity: How Speech, Gaze and Body Orientation are Coordinated to Conduct ESL Tutorial Business.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 829–841.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.027
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., and E. Stokoe. 2002. “Constructing Discussion Tasks in University Tutorials: Shifting Dynamics and Identities.” Discourse Studies 4 (4): 429–453.10.1177/1461445602004004023
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., and E. Stokoe. 2010. “University Students Resisting Academic Identity.” In Language in Use: A Reader, edited by P. Griffiths, A. J. Merrison, and A. Bloomer, 82–97. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bochenski, I. 1974. An analysis of authority. Chestnut Hill: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, N. 2007. “A Reinvestigation of the Relationship of Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy and Student Compliance-resistance with Learning.” Communication Education 56 (4): 453–475.10.1080/03634520701530896
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., O. Eris, and P. Badke-Schaub. 2014. “Question Asking in Design Reviews: How Does Inquiry Facilitate the Learning Interaction?” Paper presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Impact/1/
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. 2013. “Socializing Emotionally and Morally Appropriate Peer Group Conduct through Classroom Discourse.” Linguistics and Education 24: 511–522.10.1016/j.linged.2013.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Edelsky, C. 1981. “Who’s Got the Floor?” Language in Society 10 (03): 383–421.10.1017/S004740450000885X
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, P. 2000. “Virtual and Face-to-face Learning: Meeting Points.” Paper presented at La Formacion Virtual en el Nuevo Milenio, Madrid, Spain, June 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fox Tree, J. 2002. “Interpreting Pauses and Ums at Turn Exchanges.” Discourse Processes 34 (1): 37–55.10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1984. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Malden, MA: Polity Press/Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Glock, F. 2009. “Aspects of Language Use in Design Conversation.” CoDesign 5: 5–19.10.1080/15710880802492870
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1955. “On Facework: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry 18: 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2000. “Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach.” In The Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by T. Van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, 157–183. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C., and C. Howard. 2014. “Externalizing Normativity in Design Reviews: Inscribing Design Values in Designed Artifacts.” Paper presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Multiple/2/
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2010. “Reproducing or Constructing? Some Questions about Transcription in Social Research.” Qualitative Research 10 (5): 553–569.10.1177/1468794110375230
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., and P. Luff. 2013. “Embodied Action and Organizational Activity.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 281–307. Oxford:Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch14.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2005. “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by K. Fitch and R. Sanders, 103–148. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38.10.1177/019027250506800103
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. 2002. “Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis.” In Talking Gender and Sexuality, edited by P. McIlvenny, 49–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., B. Schnettler, J. Raab, and H.-G. Soeffner, eds. 2009. Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H., and D. Gray. 1983. “The Lecturer’s OK.” American Speech 58: 195–200.10.2307/455226
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P. 2009. “Ethical Imagination and Design.” Design Studies 30 (2): 154–168.10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R. 2009. “‘Does this Compromise Your Design?’ Interactionally Producing a Design Concept in Talk-in-interaction.” CoDesign 5: 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B. 2009. “Intersections of Brainstorming Rules and Social Order.” CoDesign 5: 65–76.10.1080/15710880802522403
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., and T. Heinemann. 2012. “Analysing Conversation: Studying Design as Social Action.” Design Studies 33: 649–672.10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.008
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2014. “Becoming a Designer: Some Contributions of Design Reviews.” Paper presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Identity/3/
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2012. “Accommodating Disagreement: A Study of Effective Design Collaboration.” Design Studies 33: 44–63.10.1016/j.destud.2011.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A. 2009. “Performing Architecture: Talking ‘Architect’ and ‘Client’ into Being.” CoDesign 5 (1): 51–63.10.1080/15710880802518054
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A. 2012. “‘You Can Argue It Two Ways’: The Collaborative Management of a Design Dilemma.” Design Studies 33: 630–648.10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A. 2013. “‘As You Said to Me I Said to Them’: Reported Speech and the Multi-vocal Nature of Collaborative Design Practice.” Design Studies 34: 34–56.10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A., and P.Lloyd. 2014. “‘Wait Wait – Dan Your Turn’: Assessment in the Design Review.” Paper presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Authority/3/
   Google Scholar
• QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). 2010. Subject Benchmark Statement: Architecture. Accessed March 8, 2015. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Architecture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. 2013. “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 308–329. Oxford:Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch15.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, edited by J. Schenkein, 7–56. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawchuk, P. 2003. “Informal Learning as a Speech-exchange System: Implications for Knowledge Production, Power and Social Transformation.” Discourse & Society 14: 291–307.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 1996. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216.10.1086/ajs.1996.102.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 1997. “Whose Text, Whose Context?” Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–187.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208
   Google Scholar
• Schleef, E. 2008. “The ‘Lecturer's Ok’ Revisited: Changing Discourse Conventions and the Influence of Academic Division.” American Speech 83 (1): 62–84.10.1215/00031283-2008-003
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sonalkar, N., A. Magogunje, and L. Leifer. 2014. “Analyzing the Display of Professional Knowledge through Interpersonal Interactions in Design Reviews.” Paper presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Knowledge/3/
   Google Scholar
• Speer, S. 2005. Gender Talk. Hove: Routledge.10.4324/9780203321447
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., and A. Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321.10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, D., D. Socha, and W.-M.Rot. 2014. “Designerly Ways of Being.” Paper presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Modalities/3/
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, D., D. Socha, and W.-M. Rot. Forthcoming. “Seeing Design Stances.” CoDesign.
   Google Scholar
• Thonus, T. 2008. “Acquaintanceship, Familiarity, and Coordinated Laughter in Writing Tutorials.” Linguistics and Education 19: 333–350.10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Tottie, G. 2011. “Uh and Um as Sociolinguistic Markers in British English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (2): 173–197.10.1075/ijcl.16.2
   Google Scholar