Seeing design stances

References

• Adams, Robin S., and Junaid A. Siddiqui. 2013. Purdue DTRS – Design Review Conversations Database. XRoads Technical Report. West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, Tanya L., and John A. Bargh. 1999. “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (6): 893–910.10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400851744
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2001. “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science.” Design Studies 17 (3): 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, Deanna P. 2005. “Performing Tribal Rituals: A Genre Analysis of ‘Crits’ in Design Studios.” Communication Education 54 (2): 136–160.10.1080/03634520500213165
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, David. 1998. “Design Talk: Constructing the Object in Studio Conversations.” Design Issues 14 (2): 41–62.10.2307/1511850
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, Amy Lynn Housely. 2010. “Communicating about, in, and through Design: A Study Exploring Communication Instruction and Design Students’ Critique Performance.” PhD diss., North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Rod. 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: Benjamin.10.1075/pbns.92
   Google Scholar
• Glock, Friedrich. 2009. “Aspects of Language Use in Design Conversation.” CoDesign 5 (1): 5–19.10.1080/15710880802492870
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Christian. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628221
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff. 1993. “Disembodied Conduct: Interactional Asymmetries in Video-mediated Communication.” In Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, edited by G. Button, 35–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie, and E. Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Youn-Kyung, Erik Stolterman, and Josh Tenenberg. 2008. “The Anatomy of Prototypes: Prototypes as Filters, Prototypes as Manifestations of Design Ideas.” Transactions on Computer Human Interaction 15 (2) Article id: 7.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Richard E., and Jeffrey H. Tindall. 1983. “Effect of Postural Congruence on Client’s Perception of Counselor Empathy.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 30 (2): 158–163.10.1037/0022-0167.30.2.158
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, Janet, and Peter Lloyd. 2014. “Beyond Specification: A Study of Architect and Client Interaction.” Design Studies 35: 327–352.10.1016/j.destud.2014.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Medway, P. 2003. “Imagining the Building; Architectural Design as Semiotic Construction.” Design Studies 24: 255–273.10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00055-8
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Keith M. 2005. “Collaborative Imagining: The Interactive Use of Gestures, Talk, and Graphic Representation in Architectural Practice.” Semiotica 156 (1–4): 113–145.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Keith M. 2012. “Transmodality and Temporality in Design Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1966–1981.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.013
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Harold G., and Erik Stolterman. 2003. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Oak, Arlene, and Peter Lloyd. 2014. “‘Wait, Wait: Dylan, Your Turn’: Authority and Assessment in the Design Critique.” In Design Thinking Research Symposium 10. W. Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Yeonjoo, Suguru Ishizaki, Mark D. Gross, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2013. “A Theoretical Framework of Design Critiquing in Architecture Studios.” Design Studies 34: 302–325.10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael. 2001. “Gestures: Their Role in Teaching and Learning.” Review of Educational Research 71 (3): 365–392.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael. 2011. Geometry as Objective Science in Elementary Classrooms: Mathematics in the Flesh. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael, and Michelle K. McGinn. 1998. “Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice.” Review of Educational Research 68 (1): 35–59.10.3102/00346543068001035
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael, and Kenneth Tobin. 2010. “Solidarity and Conflict: Aligned and Misaligned Prosody as a Transactional Resource in Intra- and Intercultural Communication Involving Power Differences.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 5: 805–847.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael, and Timothy J. Mavin. 2015. “Peer Assessment of Aviation Performance: Inconsistent for Good Reasons.” Cognitive Science 39: 405–433.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Socha, David, Wolff-Michael Roth, and Josh Tenenberg. 2015. “Taking a (design) Stance.” In Analyzing Design Review Conversations, edited by R. S. Adams, J. Siddiqui, and P. Buzzanell. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, Josh, and Laurie Murphy. 2005. “Knowing What I Know: An Investigation of Undergraduate Knowledge and Self-Knowledge of Data Structures.” Computer Science Education 15 (4): 297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, Josh, Wolff-Michael Roth, and David Socha. 2015. “From I-Awareness to We-Awareness in CSCW.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). doi:10.1007/s10606-014-9215-0.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinciarelli, Alessandro, Maja Pantic, and Hervé Bourlard. 2009. “Social Signal Processing: Survey of an Emerging Domain.” Image and Vision Computing 27 (12): 1743–1759.10.1016/j.imavis.2008.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Visser, Willemien. 2009. “The Function of Gesture in an Architectural Design Meeting.” In About: Designing Analysing Design Meetings, edited by Janet McDonnell and Peter Lloyd, 269–284. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar