Giving and responding to feedback through visualisations in design critiques

References

• Adams, R. S., T. Forin, M. Chua, and D. Radcliffe. 2014. Making Design Pedagogical Content Knowledge Visible Within Design Reviews. Paper presented at the 10th design thinking research symposium – Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. S., and J. Siddiqui. 2013. Purdue DTRS – Design Review Conversations Database. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and D. Karreman. 2000. “Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis.” Human Relations 53 (9): 1125–1149. doi: 10.1177/0018726700539002.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K., and D. Mumby. 2004. “Organizing a Critical Communicology of Gender and Work.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 166: 19–43. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.2004.012.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., T. R. Kuhn, and F. Cooren. 2009. “Constitutional Amendments: ‘Materializing’ Organizational Communication.” The Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 1–64.10.1080/19416520903047186
   Google Scholar
• Barley, W. C., P. M. Leonardi, and D. E. Bailey. 2012. “Engineering Objects for Collaboration: Strategies of Ambiguity and Clarity at Knowledge Boundaries.” Human Communication Research 38 (3): 280–308. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01430.x.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit-Barné, C., and F. Cooren. 2009. “The Accomplishment of Authority through Presentification: How Authority is Distributed Among and Negotiated by Organizational Members.” Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/0893318909335414.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, B. 2006. “Perception Interpretation Impact; An Examination of the Learning Value of Formative Feedback to Students through the Design Studio Critique.” EdD thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Brummans, B., F. Cooren, D. Robichaud, and J. R. Taylor. 2014. “Approaches to the Communicative Constitution of Organizations.” 3rd ed. In Sage Handbook of Organizational Communication, edited by L. L. Putnam and D. K. Mumby, 173–194. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brummans, B., J. M. Hwang, and P. H. Cheong. 2013. “Mindful Authoring through Invocation: Leaders’ Constitution of a Spiritual Organization.” Management Communication Quarterly 27 (3): 346–372. doi:10.1177/0893318913479176.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. 1994. Designing Engineers (Inside Technology). Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardella, M. E., and M. Lande. 2007. Ambiguity as a Bridge between Mathematical Thinking and Design Thinking. Paper presented at the design thinking research symposium VII London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Cardella, M. E., D. Tolbert, A. Cummings, C. Zoltowski, and P. Buzzanell. 2015. Providing and Responding to Feedback: Negotiating Ambiguity. Paper presented at the 10th design thinking research symposium – Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, K., and C. Brandt. 2012. “The ‘Right Kind of Telling’: Knowledge Building in the Academic Design Studio.” Educational Technology Research and Development ETR & D. 60 (5): 839–858.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 509–535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory : A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G., and K. L. Ashcraft. 2007. “Considering ‘The Professional’ in Communication Studies: Implications for Theory and Research Within and Beyond the Boundaries of Organizational Communication.” Communication Theory 17 (2): 146–175. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00290.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. 2004. “Textual Agency: How Texts do Things in Organizational Settings.” Organization 11 (3): 373–393. doi: 10.1177/1350508404041998.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., B. Brummans, C. Benoit-Barné, and F. Matte. 2013. “Organizational Culture as Cultivation: A Ventriloqual Perspective.” In Faces of Organizational Culture and Communication. Vol. 3, edited by M. Marchiori, 153–179. São Paulo: Difusão.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., B. Brummans, and D. Charrieras. 2008. “The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Medecins Sans Frontieres in action.” Human Relations 61 (10): 1339–1370. doi:10.1177/0018726708095707.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., T. Kuhn, J. P. Cornelissen, and T. Clark. 2011. “Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue.” Organization Studies 32 (9): 1149–1170. doi:10.1177/0170840611410836.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., F. Matte, C. Benoit-Barné, and B. J. M. Brummans. 2013. “Communication as Ventriloquism: A Grounded-in- Action Approach to the Study of Organizational Tensions.” Communication Monographs 80 (3): 255–277. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.788255.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, A., D. Tolbert, C. Zoltowski, M. E. Cardella, and P. M. Buzzanell. 2016. “A Quantitative Exploration of Student-Instructor Interactions Amidst Ambiguity.” In Analyzing Design Review Conversations, edited by R. S. Adams, and J. A. Siddiqui, 395–412. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D., and K. Martin. 2008. “Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22 (2): 135–159. doi:10.1177/10506519073119210.1177/1050651907311923
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D., A. Housley Gaffney, and K. Norris Martin. 2008. “Beyond Content, Deeper than Delivery: What Critique Feedback Reveals about Communication Expectations in Design Education.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2 (2), Article 12. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol2/iss2/12.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, A. 2007. “The Enactment of Design through Language.” Design Studies 28 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 2008. “A Communicative Theory of the Firm: Developing an Alternative Perspective on Intra-organizational Power and Stakeholder Relationships.” Organization Studies 29 (8–9): 1227–1254. doi:10.1177/0170840608094778.
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, J. C., and M. A. Garcia. 2009. “Exploring the Concept of ‘Profession’ for Organizational Communication Research: Institutional Influences in a Veterinary Organization.” Management Communication Quarterly 22 (3): 357–384. doi:10.1177/0893318908327007.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, GBR: Oxford University Press, UK, ProQuest ebrary. Web. 30 September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marbouti, F., H. A. Diefes-Dux, and M. E. Cardella. 2015. “Students and Engineering Educators’ Feedback on Design.” Proceedings of the American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., and C. Eckert. 2003. “Against Ambiguity.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12 (2): 153–183.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Keith M., Jonas Ivarsson, and Gustav Lymer. 2012. “Embodied Reasoning in Architectural Critique.” Design Studies 33 (6): 530–556.
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A. 2011. “What Can Talk Tell us About Design?: Analyzing Conversation to Understand Practice.” Design Studies 32 (3): 211–234.10.1016/j.destud.2010.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A., and Lloyd, P. 2014. “Wait, Wait, Dan, Your Turn’: Assessment in the Design Review.” Paper presented at the 10th design thinking research symposium – Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Purzer, Ş., N. D. Fila, and E. C. Dick. 2014. A Cross-case Analysis of Disciplinary Identities Communicated through Design Reviews. Paper Presented at the 10th design thinking research symposium – Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L., and A. M. Nicotera, eds. 2009. Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robichaud, D., and F. Cooren, eds. 2011. Organization and Organizing: Materiality, Agency and Discourse. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C. 2012. Information Visualization Perception for Design. 3rd ed., Interactive Technologies. Burlington, VT: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar