Visualising professional vision interactions in design reviews

References

• Adams, R. 2015. “Design Review Conversations: The Dataset.” In Analyzing Design Review Conversations (Chapter 2), edited by R. S. Adams and J. Siddiqui, 23–30. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, P. 2004. Spaces, Domains, and Meanings: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Broudy, H. S. 1977. “Types of Knowledge and Purposes of Education.” In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, edited by R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague, 1–17. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., O. Eris, and P. Badke‐Schaub. 2014. “Question Asking in Design Reviews: How Does Inquiry Facilitate the Learning Interaction?” Paper Presented at Design Thinking Research Symposium. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Impact/1/.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2011. “The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532.10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eris, O. 2002. “Perceiving, Comprehending, and Measuring Design Activity through the Questions Asked While Designing.” PhD diss., Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. 1995. “The Designer as a Team of One.” Design Studies 16 (2): 189–209.10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., H. Hochman, and I. Dafni. 2010. “The Design Studio “Crit”: Teacher–Student Communication.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24 (3): 285–302.10.1017/S089006041000020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633.10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., and B. A. Bechky. 2006. “When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work.” Organization Science 17 (4): 484–500.10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., and Weil, B. 2003. “A New Approach of Innovative Design: An Introduction to CK Theory.” In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, A., J. E. Bouwen, and H. Neuckermans. 1999. “Walking on a Thin Line—Between Passive Knowledge and Active Knowing of Components and Concepts in Architectural Design.” Design Studies 20 (2): 211–235.10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00035-0
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. 1981. IMPRO: Improvisation and Theatre. London: Methuen Drama.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, M. F., and L. J Leifer. 2011. “A Method to Study Affective Dynamics and Performance in Engineering Design Teams.” In DS 68-7: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 7: Human Behaviour in Design.Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., and Byung G. K. 2003. “Personal Characteristics and Design-related Performances in a Creative Engineering Design Course.” In Proceedings of the 6th Asian design conference. Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. L. 2012. “The Effects of Team Member Intrinsic Differences on Emergent Team Dynamics and Long-term Innovative Performance in Engineering Design Teams.” PhD Diss., Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, J. H., and H. A. Simon. 1987. “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words.” Cognitive Science 11 (1): 65–100.10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. 2003. “Making Sense of Collaboration: The Challenge of Thinking Together in Global Design Teams.” Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 153–160. Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lymer, G. 2009. “Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 16 (2): 145–171.10.1080/10749030802590580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, B. 2009. “Intersections of Brainstorming Rules and Social Order.” CoDesign 5 (1): 65–76.10.1080/15710880802522403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A., and G. Wiggins. 1992. “Kinds of Seeing and Their Functions in Designing.” Design Studies 13 (2): 135–156.10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F
   Google Scholar
• Schrage, Michael. 1993. “The Culture (S) of Prototyping.” Design Management Journal (Former Series) 4 (1): 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sonalkar, N. 2012. “A Visual Representation to Characterize Moment-to-Moment Concept Generation through Interpersonal Interactions in Engineering Design Teams.” PhD Diss., Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sonalkar, N., A. Mabogunje, and L. Leifer. 2013. “Developing a Visual Representation to Characterize Moment-to-Moment Concept Generation in Design Teams.” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1 (2): 93–108.10.1080/21650349.2013.773117
   Google Scholar
• Sonalkar, N., A. Mabogunje, Pai G., A. Krishnan, and B. Roth. (2015). Diagnostics for Design Thinking Teams. In Design Thinking Research, edited by L. Leifer, C. Meinel, and H. Plattner 35–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stempfle, J., and P. Badke-Schaub. 2002. “Thinking in Design Teams-an Analysis of Team Communication.” Design Studies 23 (5): 473–496.10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. C. 1991. “Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (2): 143–160.10.1016/0020-7373(91)90039-A
   Google Scholar
• Uluoǧlu, B. 2000. “Design Knowledge Communicated in Studio Critiques.” Design Studies 21 (1): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, A. C. 2000. The Reflective Practice in Product Design Teams. TU Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, R. 2003. “Relating the Quality of the Idea Generation Process to the Quality of the Resulting Design Ideas.” In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design. Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Verstijnen, I. M., Cees van Leeuwen, G. Goldschmidt, R. Hamel, and J. M. Hennessey. 1998. “Sketching and Creative Discovery.” Design Studies 19 (4): 519–546.10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00017-9
   Google Scholar